The 3rd try for this post. Keeps getting removed. I'll keep rewording till approved -
Just got a review from someone who said he saw me in November 2019. No, he saw me in April 2018. Doesn't TER have a rule about not posting a review that is too old? The reviewer obviously does not have a good memory because he implied I don't do something that I do. Or maybe he just has terrible hygiene, and stunk.
Most of you know me by now and usually never one to complain. But it's terrible to wake up in the morning and check reviews, and see something that isn't true. It's a crappy way to start the day.
I believe it’s 90 days. It’s in that long explanation at the start of writing a review. I’m to lazy to look, but I’m pretty sure it’s 3 months
Disappointing that the guys are already trying to scam the system to get free VIP days.
I guess somethings will NEVER CHANGE.
BTW, nice to see you posting May. However, I really enjoy your social media.
Thank you and I agree
...and I'm happy to hear you like my social media.
You have three recent reviews, NONE of them bad, and only one of them mentioning that any activities didn't happen, so I am assuming that review, your latest must be the one you are talking about. Honestly, he raved about you, and gave you the very highest score allowed under the rules. The ONLY way you can get a 10 for performance under the new rules in a single, one on one session is to actually HAVE anal sex, not just offer it, but engage in it during THAT session. The only other way to be eligible for a 10 is to have a doubles sessions, either a threesome or a gang bang.
I don't think your gripe should be with the reviewer, but with the system itself. Under the "old rules" a reviewer could give you a 10 for performance by you simply giving him a BBBJ, engaging in DFK and "offering" Greek. Those rules no longer apply, and now you have to either have sex with multiple people in the same session or actually ENGAGE in anal sex to be eligible for that same 10 in performance.
I would suggest you go to the S&P board, and bring ALL your friends and make (actually join) a big stink over there about the stupid rules TER enacted regarding the numerical scoring a couple of years back. Maybe, just maybe, we can get TER to rethink these new (and STUPID) rules. There are already multiple threads there on the subject, and many of us have voiced our displeasure about these rules, with almost NOBODY coming out in support of the new rules, not even TER themselves.
Hi GaGambler. The review was removed, which is why my post now makes no sense. The review that was removed deserved to be removed. For me, life was better and less stressful without TER, which is why I vented over that review. Was not ready for this BS again.
Thank you for assuring me that at least one of us was missing something. lol
As for the review system itself, there are a couple of interesting threads on the S&P board discussing this very subject. I know in the past TER has had a reputation for not hearing its members, and that goes for hookers and johns alike, but I do get the impression that TER is trying to do better this time around and perhaps there is an opportunity for a "reset" for a kinder and gentler TER, I might even quit being such an asshole. lol Ok, I will NEVER quit being an asshole, but there is still a chance that TER will start listening to its members. lol
Come on over to S&P, I think you will find a lot of people share your POV.
Thank you...and I don't think you are an ass hole...lol
I'm sure many people read my last post and thought, if she is so unhappy why doesn't she just leave TER? #1 it's hard to walk away from 300+ reviews. #2 I am waiting to see if things have changed. It's always been a man's club and slanted their way. It was rare when they listened to the ladies.
I was scared when TER left so I hated to see them go. But I realized rather quickly everything was going to be ok and even better. One of the things I hated most was having to put on a smile and pretend for someone who didn't take a bath for a week, only out of fear of a bad review....and then we can't defend that. Why? Now I am not afraid to march their ass into the bathroom to take a shower. That's just one example. Without the stress of "juicy details" now I speak up and YMMV really means YMMV. TER needs to listen for sure. Bad reviews are not so cut and dry. Why can't we reply to reviews here? The answer is because it's a man club and they pay. But if they want me to play here then things need to change, because I know for sure, I am ok without this stress.
Devastating, So now to get a 10 we have to do DANGEROUS ANAL? Dream on. That is sick. If you are born female it is. Unnecessary. Where do we complain about this bizarre new rule? IN USA WE DON'T DO ANAL OFTEN ! OR EVER. STI/STD FREE forever, xxoo
I started a thread on that board a couple of years ago about the very same topic and that thread got a record breaking 100+ likes. Unfortunately back then TER wasn't too receptive about the wishes of it's members and absolutely NOTHING happened. The good news is that TER seems to be much more willing to listen to suggestions about how to make this site better and "maybe" if enough of us express our displeasure about the numerical scoring system they "might" just do something about it.
BTW, I am half Asian, will that mean you will only "half like" me??? lol
good point. There is truly no way to prevent someone from writing a fake review. This topic has been discussed on TER discussions boards for quite a long time.
There is another (competing) website, which I will not mention here (of course). But that website makes me appreciate TER returning even more. Seems more than 50% of the reviews on that website are definitely fake. I know, because these reviewers have reviewed ladies I know very well. In their fake reviews, they describe places these ladies could not/have never lived. Their fake reviews describe these ladies in ways that are physically inaccurate and these reviewers describe things these ladies definitely do not offer or mention services these ladies do not provide--that they actually do!
One reviewer mentioned a provider having dogs--she does NOT. One mentioned she lived in a trailer--NEVER!!! You get the message. I have even read a review on this competing website, written on a lady I tried to contact for at least 3 years. Her phone number was not in service, and a TER member who posts a ton of discussion board topics on TER wrote a fake review on her. He could not possiblly have seen her as the contact info on her profile was wrong! Go figure!
So while it is impossible to prevent reviewers from writing fake reviews, I appreciate TER for doing a much better job than their competitors. Bravo TER! Welcome back!
-- Modified on 12/28/2019 5:37:11 PM
Review is not fake. Its more then 3 month old. Appointment took place in April 2018. TER shut down just about that time, he simply could not submit that review earlier.
There is a whole thread about it on General right now.
What I am understanding from her post it wasn't a good reviews.
Agree on TER doing by far the best job on Fraud prevention.
Fraud protection is one subject and provider protection is another subject.
Yes the review was not a fake. I don't think I ever said on this board that is was. But going on two years ago it was either not accurate because of memory issues or the client had other issues going on that day. Very likely is the review could have been partially fake. He wanted free membership so bad he was willing to make stuff up (because he could not remember accurately). Honestly I don't know and I don't care. What I do know is that I want some kind of recourse when a review does not tell the truth or the whole story.
think, is the best way of doing that?
That is why it will never happen. Many come up with bright ideas, without a logical way to bring them to fruition. Maybe TER has considered a variety of ways to provide exactly what you are asking for, but they are too difficult/controversial to implement.
That is my guess.
Since the return of the site to the US, I've seen some reviewers submitting 10+ reviews over the span of a week. Good reviews or bad, that makes me question whether or not those are recent reviews. I don't necessarily question their legitimacy, but their age.
And if someone reading this has indeed seen over 10 different ladies over the past week and still has energy left to be on here, then more power to you!
I think the real reason TER is implementing this rule is so we would submit reviews faster .
Did you really have change that much in 6 month ?
Totally think this review should stay .
...not six months! Almost two years!!
With the reviews....some reviews that seemed questionable years ago will probably pass the smell test now.But that will change in time. So the reviews was months/years ago...I'd let it go and hope most will evaluate you on your body of work.
But think of this this way. Say you have a pet that you loved, but it poops on the carpet every now and then, you get pissed. Then the pets dies, you have no more poop to clean up. But you miss that pet and you'd do anything to have it back, even if it means picking up their SHIT!....consider TER the pet.
Makes sense?
And definitely not fake!!
....but shouldn't because people have bad memories.