Not the ‘smarts’ kind of intelligence but the ‘information’ kind. I see K-girls in many cities as I travel for work, and no place more than LV. I know that the bookers share tons of information about their clients. They have a good idea of who they can, and cannot, take advantage of. Only once have I felt that I was bait & switched and that was with a lady that was not TER reviewed; but she didn’t match the description posted on the bookers site. I let him know I was displeased, and he tried to blame the girls sharing the apartment for the ‘switch’. I later had a booker in another city, without any prompting on my part, say emphaticly that he guaranteed that I would get the girl I asked for. I didn’t mention the B&S anywhere so he had to get the word from the other booker. The K-world is wired.
For the most part, I think I have been pretty fortunate in getting who I asked for from the booker.
Recently, however, I am not so sure. I very rarely see a provider based only on the booker's recommendation. But this time, little head was leading the charge. So when the provider I requested was unavailable, I accepted the recommended alternative. She had outstanding TER reviews, but only a few (4 if I recall correctly). The session was far from thrilling. It started with a shower where she jumped in without getting out of her lingerie and basically watched me wash myself off. Most disappointing was my providing in advance a donation that indicated my preference for MSOG, but being rejected when I requested the service.
Because this provider had only a few reviews and they were all excellent, I did not want to be review number 5 (or whatever low number it would have been) and give her average grades. She was sweet enough. I just think she was not into me. So I didn't want to hurt her with a review that would torpedo her numbers.
Since then, she has continued to receive excellent reviews. She is frequently praised for her no-quit type service. That could not be more different than what I experienced. Now, I am guessing that maybe it was just a bad mix with me that led to the poor performance. But the other distinct possibility is that the provider I got was not the provider named.
In any event, this could inform you about how a provider who has been reviewed is not the same provider you get. What would have been a poor review from me has yet to be posted.
P.S., In my experience if the provider is the one who was pictured on the agency website, you found the needle in the haystack. They are there, but rare.
