Las Vegas
While I'm not quite as prolific with the 10's as you are....I concur with your rant! 
Very well said Baba O Riley !!
And let me add-
BEAUTY IS IN THE EYE OF THE BEHOLDER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Do you whiners and complainers understand what that means ?
It means exactly what it means.
And you have eyes so if a guy rates a lady as a 10 , use your own eyes ,look at her photos and you decide if that is a 10 in your eyes.
If she isn't in your eyes a 10 ,doesn't mean she isn't a 10 in someone else's eyes.
No need to criticize the reviewer and call them names like WK or mangina
It is the reviewers opinion ,he is entitled to his opinion.
Just because you whiners don't agree, doesn't mean the reviewer can't give a 10 or that he is inflating the score.
A lady can be over 35 and still be a 10. Just ask Christie Brinkley Or Iman. 
And btw when you have a great photographer that knows how to use lighting ,then airbrushing is not needed.
Oh and another news flash ALL models , actors , playboys , vogue magazine cover and any cover are ALL airbrushed photos.
So a 10 doesn't mean one has to be on a magazine cover.
If that is what it means to all of the ones complaining about inflated scores......great then that's YOUR opinion. It doesn't have to be everyone's opinion.
For me ( as I am sure many will also agree ) beauty goes beyond physical.
Personality as other attributes can make a difference.
One of my favorite comedy shows is two and half men with Charlie Sheen.
In one of the episodes Charlie was dating this gorgeous Hungarian model.
But he pawned her off to his brother Allen .
Allen couldn't believe his brother would give up such a 10.
The model comes out to the bedroom looking so hot and sexy a perfect 10.
Allen couldn't believe his luck .
But then the model laid on the bed like a cold fish and said- ok do me.
At that point that 10 turned into a 5.......
Do you see where I am going with this ?
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
Yes, it isn't just a line, it is very very true.
So quite the bitching and complaining
Your not the god of - what qualifies as a 10.
If a reviewer gave a 10 , look at the ladies photos and if in your eyes it isn't a 10 ,
then move on to find who is a 10 in your eyes.
No need to insult the ladies and reviewers because your idea of beauty is one tracked.
xoxo CindySpice
If you think the only way a lady can be a 10 in looks is if she can be on the cover of Vogue magazine that's your opinion...it's not mine. My scoring system is based on a number of things I find attractive. I won't criticize your standards don't criticize mine. If a lady is way above average in beauty, if she turns heads, if she's totally physically fit for her age, and if I can't wait to see her naked, that's a 10 in my book. If you disagree so be it. I've never met too many Victoria Secret models...my guess is they have different jobs. So I personally don't think that's a fair comparison. But I've met my share of ladies and that's the basis for my scoring standards. How do they compare to the ladies in the same line of work?
Regarding performance, If I finish an engagement and I'm 100% satisfied with how it went, why would I not want to give a 10. As the song goes, "they work hard for the money..." It also helps that I do my homework, I pretty much know what I'm getting before the lady shows up and I'm pretty selective with who I see and who I review. Why would I want to see anybody that I didn't think had the ability to be a 10/10 other than price? I look for 10s that's why they get 10s...duh!
So basically just because you disagree with how some guys review, doesn't make you right. So does this make me the white knight for all the Ladies I've loved before (another song) probably but I wouldn't trade one of those 10s for anything and I look forward to a whole slew of more 10s!!! But you review your way, and I'll review mine.
-- Modified on 8/20/2012 4:40:57 PM
...Appearance ratings aren't, or at least shouldn't be, based upon photos. Most photos, well at least those of the mid - top shelf ladies, are generally relatively expensive photo shoots. Alot of effort goes into make-up and, as you correctly stated good Dr., proper lighting. No doubt there's also lots of air-brushing implemented. Not in all cases, but probably more than we're told.
So I guess my point is.....shit....what IS my point?? Damm it, Scotty!! Beam me up, there's no intelligent life in my brain!!
....call you out for that SHILL!! Oh, and for the record, I'd never, ever, NOT IN MY LIFE TIME, call ya a MANgina!! 
The Scoring system for appearance is subjective...It's hard to say what is universally 'once in a lifetime', as we all have different tastes and ideas of what outer beauty truly is. Performance scores should be subjective and based on an individual provider's offered services and scored for that, but for whatever reason are not; everyone is held to the same misogynistic scoring system.
Comparing apples and oranges and using the same scoring system to compare them is ludicrous, in my opinion. And, then further comparing those very different fruits by having a top 100 list...it makes no sense...
I believe that they should have different categories for the services that are provided and then be able to score providers based on that criteria. I'll never have a 10/10 because of services that I do not offer. While I am fine with that, other well known ladies have 10/10s though their profiles clearly state they do not offer the services required. While I'd say possibly it was overlooked when the review was passed through, I cannot because there are some providers who have several "inflated" performance scores when they don't meet the criteria...or they ask a hobbyist to claim they offered a particular service one time so "YMMV" in order to sneak a higher score in...
I wish there was a way to make some changes to the current review system, as I don't think it gives gentlemen, particularly newbies, a chance to make a truly educated choice.
Based on the ladies I do know that you have seen, Baba, I can vouch for the 10s in appearance...and the others photograph beautifully, airbrushed or not, so I'm sure they were well deserved; besides I know you have great taste in women!
If you think the only way a lady can be a 10 in looks is if she can be on the cover of Vogue magazine that's your opinion...it's not mine. My scoring system is based on a number of things I find attractive. I won't criticize your standards don't criticize mine. If a lady is way above average in beauty, if she turns heads, if she's totally physically fit for her age, and if I can't wait to see her naked, that's a 10 in my book. If you disagree so be it. I've never met too many Victoria Secret models...my guess is they have different jobs. So I personally don't think that's a fair comparison. But I've met my share of ladies and that's the basis for my scoring standards. How do they compare to the ladies in the same line of work?
Regarding performance, If I finish an engagement and I'm 100% satisfied with how it went, why would I not want to give a 10. As the song goes, "they work hard for the money..." It also helps that I do my homework, I pretty much know what I'm getting before the lady shows up and I'm pretty selective with who I see and who I review. Why would I want to see anybody that I didn't think had the ability to be a 10/10 other than price? I look for 10s that's why they get 10s...duh!
So basically just because you disagree with how some guys review, doesn't make you right. So does this make me the white knight for all the Ladies I've loved before (another song) probably but I wouldn't trade one of those 10s for anything and I look forward to a whole slew of more 10s!!! But you review your way, and I'll review mine.
-- Modified on 8/20/2012 4:40:57 PM
I, thoroughly enjoyed this post , especially your proposed rating system. I cant stop laughing!
The pictures are on the web site, the girls post new ones with their ads all the time, they participate in the photo threads, you can "say" the pictures are accurate or not, is the number really that important. There are 20 - 100 reviews on each girl, you can average. What is the issue? Are guys showing up, getting disappointed that the 9.5 is only a 8.9? Do hobbyist not want to read the reviews, do guys just look at the number and judge from there?
Is it necessary to discount a score because they don't do Greek or BBBJ? That is listed on the profile very clearly? Are people just upset about grade inflation?
And it's not just the guys, the girls talk about it all the time. Enough already, every two or three months we dredge this up again and again.
If I could submit a review without a number I would.
Sorry, I get frustrated with this issue too. It seems like we never resolve it. Is there a way we can develop a "grading policy"? Or have people propose their own policy? Here are some of my suggestions:
If a girl keeps her heels on with out asking, that's a 10.
If a girls forces a second pop out of me and won't take no for an answer, 10.
If a girls truly engages me in conversation that I don't want to end, 10.
Wears her own high end lingerie, 10
If a girls says sexy things as I am reaching climax, 10.
Sexy faces during Russian, 10.
Eye contact during oral, 10
Pinches my nipples really hard, 10
Slaps me around, kicks me in the balls, spits in my face and calls me "bitch boy", that's an 11.
Just some ideas. I'm going to work this before my next visit. I'll make a chart and send it to them before the visit. Then they can fill it out. I'm really tired of these fucking numbers.
Did TER change their review policies?
From what I understand ( and maybe I'm wrong since I don't write reviews
and I haven't read rule guidelines in depth ) a provider is entitled to a point for services she offers even if you didn't use that particular service.
So let's say a lady offers BBBJ but you want CBJ ,she still deserves that point .
Making her score at least an 8. Not 7 .
She offers Greek but your not interested ,still she should get another point. So now that's a 9.
Now if she has a long list of - I don't do....... Like no oral or CBJ only.
No this , no that .....then it may be a 7 and yes the lady should know and expect that.
And all her reviews should already been a 7. So why would she get mad ?
But if scoring is based on what happened during the session .....
Well then many scores are not correct including many 9's and 10's
Of course this is not my site and the owner of the site has the right to make the rules.
His site , his rules.......BUT in my opinion how can different experiences even be compared by numbers.
Why is an experience with BBBJis considered better then a CBJ or deserve a higher rating ?
Maybe someone got a CBJ that was better then someone's else BBBJ
After all the review is from that reviewers point of you.
If the reviewers expectations were met , why shouldn't he be allowed to give a -
" I forgot it was a service " or even a - "once in a lifetime "
since I don't make the rules it is what it is........but I don't think rating is based on what you got ...... Am I wrong ? Did something change in guidelines that I don't know about ?
Oh and btw how many points for prolonging someone for an hour I would say that qualifies for "once in a lifetime experience" "wink wink"
XOXO CindySpice
So if ladies do get 7s, they shouldn't blame us
(I think the rating system is flawed, because if ladies KNOW that they can't get a high rating if they don't perform those other tasks, then they are going to be disgruntled when people like me ask for covers and stuff. That shouldn't be what it is about.)