We're on our fourth version of the Top 27 and we're up to 52 girls!  (52 Girls, wasn't that a song by the B-52's?)  So many girls, so little time (or too little money!).

For those who are not loyal followers of this list, I'll explain.  Below is a listing of escorts in Las Vegas ranked by average performance review score.  The first number given after her name is the average performance score of her most recent 10 reviews here on TER as of 6-13-03.  The second number is her average appearance score for those same reviews.  Independent escorts only, minimum 10 reviews to qualify.  In case of a tie in performance score, the girl with the higher appearance socre is listed first.  (In case of both scores being tied, I resorted to alphabetical order!)

The big news is that there is a new number one.  That new number one is Jenni!  The fact that she's my personal favorite is strictly a coincidence.  (She also has one of the best web sites on the internet!) How did your personal favorite do?

1.  Jenni 9.4, 7.9
2.  LJ Montana 9.3, 9.5
3.  Tori 9.2, 8.6
4.  Angel 9.2, 7.1
5.  Jackie 9.1, 8.5
6.  Irene 9.0, 7.2
7.  Arianna 8.8, 8.8
8.  Angella 8.7, 8.3
9.  Dana 8.7, 7.7
10. Mars 8.6, 8.7
11. Megan 8.6, 6.9
12. Ellyse Taylor 8.5, 8.4
13. Jennifer Tyler 8.5, 8.4
14. Ashley 8.5, 8.1
15. Tara 8.5, 7.1
16. Kiana 8.4, 9.0
17. Nikki Avalon 8.4, 8.4
18. Cindy Spice 8.4, 7.9
19. Armani 8.3, 8.8
20. Savanna 8.3, 8.3
21. Roxanne 8.3, 8.1
22. Brooke Butler 8.3, 8.0
23. January 8.3, 8.0
24. Steevie 8.3, 7.7
25. Alexis 8.2, 7.1
26. Alexia Jay 8.1, 7.4
27. Natasha 8.0, 8.9
28. Elizabeth Layne 8.0, 7.7
29. Angelina Amour 8.0, 7.6
30. Elaina 8.0, 6.4
31. Nicole 8.0, 5.9
32. Kayla 7.9, 8.2
33. Brie Michaels 7.9, 7.9
34. Devin 7.9, 7.8
35. Mya Chan 7.9, 7.1
36. Kellie 7.9, 6.9
37. Michelle 7.8, 8.1
38. Kit 7.8, 7.4
39. Jackie Jewel 7.7, 7.8
40. Amy Jordan 7.7, 7.7
41. Roxy 7.6, 8.0
42. Logan 7.6, 7.5
43. Sheila Jones 7.6, 7.4
44. Tia 7.5, 8.7
45. Daisy Lynn 7.5, 7.2
46. Rose 7.4, 7.5
47. Desiree 7.4, 7.3
48. Jade 7.3, 7.9
49. Sable 7.2, 6.8
50. Shannon 7.1, 7.8
51. Diana 6.8, 7.0
52. Leslie Morehead 6.5, 7.2

I thought you were using a "combined" score for the ratings. I think that would be much more fair. Performance ratings are somewhat standard,(like the old saying, "the worst i had was great" but "Beauty is in the eye of the beholder".Too bad you couldn't do a "reverse list". It would be interesting to see how "we" would be rated.(Though I am sure better ratings would be "purchased". If you want to keep it fair, you shouldn't have a personal favorite unless you've been with everyone. Somebody new to the scene can always make a great "first impression", but an established "classic never goes out of style

For my info, the "Ashley at number 14, is the Ashley of Spokane (now of las Vegas)?

The "Ashley" listed at number 14 is indeed "Ashley of Spokane."  If you do a search for "Ashley" under "Las Vegas" 4 different Ashleys will show up, but only Ashley of Spokane has 10 or more reviews.  

Winebuddy, u da man!  But  I am confused.  Are you setting the rankings by performance?  Is performance the first score and appearance the second?  If this is so, I understand.  But, If you combine the two, my ATF LJ, appears to be #1 by a longshot!

It's your list, so you can do what you want, I just need clarification!  I really appreciate your efforts!

Thank you for taking the time and effort. Lot's of hugs, DevinDDD

I agree with reguy, but I'm also dumbfounded and shocked. Jenni wasn't even on the last list and bang.....she's #1?!?!?! You need to look at the complete package, performance AND appearance. LJ was robbed.

The first number following the girl's name is the average performance score, the next number is the average appearance score.  This is opposite of how the numbers are reported on the TER reviews.  The ranking is based on the average performance score, average appearance score is only used as a tie-breaker if needed.

I chose to do the ranking based only on performance score because in my opinion that's the more important of the two.  (Although both are important.)  Apparently I'm not the only one who feels that way.  Of the 52 girls ranked, 35 have higher performance scores than appearance scores, 13 have their performance scores lower than their appearance scores, and 4 have equal scores.  The largest spread is +2.1, that is performance is 2.1 points above appearance.  On the opposite end, the largest in the other direction is -0.9, that is performance is 0.9 below appearance.  This leads to an interesting debate:  does a better looking woman make you feel the experience was better; or does a more pleasant experience make the woman seem better looking? (Sort of a "chicken and egg" debate.)

Adding the scores of performance and appearance and then ranking the girls is an interesting concept.  I'll consider this for the next list, but it would require more time on my part.  When I first did the list with only 27 girls, I did it all on one lunch hour.  Now that there are 52 girls, it took most of a Saturday night.  (No money in the budget for hobbying that night.)

With regards to Jenni, she was not on the previous list because the list is only for independents, and at the time the previous list came out, she was with an agency.  Now she is independent, and therefore qualifies for the list.  And I wouldn't call being ranked #2 just 0.1 behind #1 as being ripped off!

maybe Jenni should only be ranked on revies AS an independant. Start with reviews posted after she declared her independance from pretty maids.  She has stellar reviews working for the agency but it is supposed to be an independant list. That means she should more than qualify by the next list.

She seems to be a great gal, and we know lots of guys who adore her but lets be fair when it comes to ranking her on the list.

Actually, the most recent 10 reviews of Jenni are all from after she went independent.  I didn't necessarily plan it that way, it was just a coincidence.