Every so often I see a young visiting indy and I am reminded why I prefer kgirls.

The last time I visited an indy, I confirmed prior to booking that bbbj was on the menu. I was assured it was, however during our session she told me cbj only. And this is for a donation considerably above what kgirls charge.  

The time before that the indy kept me waiting 10 minutes after the appointment time. After a quick round one, she disappeared into the shower and when she came out announced that my time was up. I got maybe 30 minutes from an hour appointment.  

kgirls provide better service a consistent menu and at a lower donation.

In my opinion, competition is fierce with K-Girls. One bad session could derail their future appointments due to reviews. K-Girls are also heavy volume providers with financial goals. Better reputation means they can reach their goals sooner and leave the industry.  

But yeah, I find it very hard to see independents after experiencing K-Girls. I've experienced some below average K-Girl sessions in the past, but reasonable rates allow me to take chances.

...your bad experiences with two non K-girls.

 
What if someone posted the following:
"Every so often I see a K-girl and I am reminded of why I prefer non K-girls.

 
The last time I visited a K-girl, her photos were so heavily photoshopped that I thought it was a bait & switch.  She spoke no English even though her profile said she did.  This was disappointing because I like to talk to providers as if they were human beings rather than just have sex with them.

 
The time before that the K-girl was at least 15 years older than the stated age in both her ad and her TER profile.  WTF?  
 If I had wanted to see a "halmeoni" I would have booked one.  And when I DATY'ed her, I tasted the cum of the guy before me who creampied her.

 
The ads and TER profiles of non K-girls are far more accurate.  Reviewers are not afraid to give bad reviews to non K-girls.  The higher donation for non K-girls is well worth it to know that I won't be getting a pig in a poke when the door opens."

 
You wouldn't like that if someone inferred that ALL K-girls were as described.  Yet your post seems to be judging ALL non K-girls on the basis of two experiences.

-- Modified on 10/19/2022 7:52:36 PM

It's all about managing your risk.  There is inherently less risk with Kgirls, but it's not zero.  Doing the homework to vet them as much as possible combined with the reasonable price for a session doesn't eliminate the risk completely, but makes it tolerable for a lot of us here.   With that said, I will still TOFTT periodically with an FOB girl with no history or reviews, but not at the volume I used to.  Risk tolerance varies from monger to monger.

 
Not only do I not TOFTT with indies, I won't see one with less than 10 reviews no matter how hot she is.  

Agreed. It seemed like a knee jerk decision based on a very small sample base.

Having just returned to the k world, I will probably continue to see indies more than kgirls. Both worlds can be amazing, and I've yet to book a bad indy. I attribute that to good research.  

Bottom line, as always, is "you pays your money and you takes your chances."

not all kgals are good. They are my preference, but I think the service has gone down in the last few years frankly. I could be wrong b/c I don't monger as much as some.  Some are amazing, but I'm surprised at how bad some can be.  (Cora comes to mind).

its all in the research however.  I might try my luck with a C-org.... I can always walk out if I don't like the view.  Indies requires research for sure.

Kgirls are still the best value of average service per dollar spent in the game. Even though prices going up are closing the gap a bit.

Great Post!