What really turns  me on is a girl who is apparently turned on as well. When their pussy drips like a running faucet from a tongue or a tongue and finger then you know they are really loving it.  Currently for me it has to be Hazel and Chanel  from M. They both get so wet that they actually soak through the towel that's supposed to protect the sheets.  Another great one was Lia  who was with M. She was a true squirter who literally could  squirt actoss the bed. Nothing like sticking your bare cock into any of  those three.  Slipped in so easily and you could  feel the juices engulf you. There are more but those are the ones who  come to mind whenever I think of DATY.

I too love delicious pussy!

I too love 'water works' kgirls!! Lia needs to be added to the list...

Apparently you have another one down in So Cal named 'Yoco'.  

YMMV

-- Modified on 7/10/2020 9:55:44 AM

My man Twoon and his waterworks. You know I was definitely a fan of them too. Yuffie in NorCal could be a bit scary tho with her grinding your face DATY aka waterboarding.  

I agree Hazel of M in LA does have a nicely wet amazing pussy. Twoon you were a big fan of her at Baykisses I remember. She was Alisha. Now my current ATF.

I have heard another former kgirls named Sooji was one of the biggest squirters but never saw her unfortunately. She had a very large clit apparently. Must have been interesting to DATY her  Legends of the past. Squirters are a rarity nowadays.

Yuffie is a queen. The highs with her are absolutely incredible. I would say as much as a highlight experience with her probably trumps any other kgirl experience I've had. It's a giant wet, nasty, delicious, wreckless, dangerous mess of a session that is heavenly.  

 
Consistency and endurance and overall attitude is why I'd still choose Claire over her, but Jesus... I'd put a horny, motivated Yuffie against any squirter out there. What she might lack in liquid volume versus let's say Ruby, she will makeup with her lust for sex.

I'm not really a daty person, especially with bbfs girls, but it's a crime if I don't eat some of that gushy pussy of hers. LOL.

If you're talking about Yoco who used to be in WLA that was fake.  I knew when she blew cold water all over me.  She had the water stored somehow before the session and then squirted on command.

another board about you telling other mongers if you get them all worked up with DATY, then you don't have to ask a CFS girl for BBFS, you "just go for it" and "stick it in."  You got called out over there that its rape, but as usual, you just doubled down on "how much they want it when you get them wet."    You're still clueless and haven't lost your touch as a first class Kgirl abuser.  

 
So these are your shills for the week?  You must have heard there are some new guys here and you're hoping to con them into seeing new girls.  I do like how you throw in another girl who is gone to make it look like a Public Service Announcement in order to try to disguise the fact that you are a compensated shill for "current" girls Hazel and Chanel.  I also like how you reviewed Chanel twice so that you could give her TWO 9-9's to raise her score up a little.  Do you think that's honest?  I betting you'll give Hazel a second review too if her score starts to fall.  Good luck to you.  The new crop of young Kgirl fans are not as gullible as they once were five years ago.  If mongers here are thinking about taking the plunge on these two, they should read back four or five years how you would put up a shill girl, young guys would  flock to see her, and then come back and say you fucked them, she was no good.  You did do ME a valuable service.  If you are recommending them, that means they are not making it in LA, which in turn, means shitty service, which in turn, means they go right on my DNS list.  Girls that are good don't need shilling, only the bad ones do.  

 
The problem with BBFS girls is that they think that because they are going bare, they don't have to really try very hard to give a overall good session.  That's why they have so few repeats, except you, of course, but  you're not paying full price like everyone else.  Even with BBFS, the girls attitude can still be bad and  she can still give you a shitty session.  

 
Did you catch the new acronym.  Had you in mind when I  posted it . . . . . DATYCIM.  (Yep, its not YOUR cum you're swallowing, but since you love snowballing your own load, I guess it all tastes the same after awhile.    Lol)

I'd say it's definitely true that younger kgirls think bbfs by itself is enough service in most cases. Which ends up hurting service and resulting in terrible experiences. Hera at M (aka Jane at sexyangels) is a great example of this. My worst experience ever with a kgirl.  

However, my top three all time favorites are all bbfs. One I haven't ever fucked raw. The other two... well, things happen. But they definitely are milfs. And they give amazing service,that has little to do with bbfs.  

My point is, I think it's a bit unfair to label bbfs girls as somehow inferior. Think of what bigpapa says, don't think you wanna be like him...

I know he had a reputation for having "Dead Fish Breath" but I think that he's a dead fish in other areas too. Which could explain that while the rest of us are talking about having fun and getting laid, he's off sulking in the corner or trying to "catch" one of us in a lie, or alternatively stalking one of more of us on other boards.

 
Back to BBFS, I have to admit, I HATE condoms, and I honestly can't imagine giving a covered session a "ten". Covered sex, no matter how good could never be considered the best sex I could have with a girl, no matter how good the sex is with a cover, just like a blow job, uncovered always feels better. That said, I am a "high volume" guy, like many on this board, I don't have a death wish and I don't want my dick to work as long as absolutely possible so I am not going to be having unprotected sex with a different hooker three times a week, I would NEVER go BB with a hooker who openly advertised it as a service she provides, but I am not going to lie like so many guys (and girls) and try to claim I never do it.

 
And yes, I fully agree that labeling BBFS girls "inferior" is a bit unfair, but I do concede a LOT of girls start offering it as they get older and their looks start to fade. You see it a lot in the Non K-Girl reviews where for years a woman is getting 7's and 8's for performance and all of a sudden they start getting 10's AND their appearance scores start going up too, even though they haven't lost any weight, had any work done or in any way made themselves look any better except for fucking their clients bare back.

BBFS girls inferior?  Cona, Suri, Allie, Chanel, Rain, Luna, Mini, Hazel,  etc. And the list goes on.

to a few things off this threads:
Yuffie- definitely agree with the wild and sex craved, voluptuous vixen. That crazy long tongue of her that will lick every inch of your privates. She performed BBBJ non stop for well over 30 mins and I think she can easily go for an hour. She gets off on sniffing your manly parts haha. She is something wild no doubt. I preferred Ruby body wise. Just my opinion but both had their reasons for visits.  
BBFS vs CFS: never force a girl into a service she doesn’t provide. It can be grounds for being blacklisted from the entire org. And dealing with an very angry kgirl on top of that. The way I figure out ymmv girls is by warming up with bare P2P if they are open and allow. This is usually where they will squirm to allow insertion or squirm away to reach for condom. It’s the safest way to test an unknown without disrupting the flow of session. Or you can just ask her and she can decide what to allow. Simple as that.  
As far as Hazel, I too have left an outstanding review for Hazel. And an OK review for Vixen from Pepsi. I’m new-ish to the LA scene now and I am pretty honest about a girl’s service and body. I was a mid-range length NorCal monger. I went as far back as enjoying Leah towards the end so that can tell you of my active timeline for those that aren’t familiar with me. Twoon and I had fun exchanges on EM about our rendezvous. I was pretty active under a different review name on EM, but just never joined TER until now. If you’re on other private chat threads, you’ll also know how active I am there and am pretty honest about the ladies. I give generous scores but not out of the ballpark. I’m just happy to start contributing here now. I have a few reviews coming from recent encounters.  
DATY on.

Golddustbro is a legit monger.  He and I sessioned with at least ten of the same kgirls over the past few years and have similar tastes and sexperiences with the kgirls.  He's also got some deep pockets and sessions with the $400 - $600 / hour donation escorts.  I am of the opinion that he is a promoter and not a shill.  See below.

CDL, you called my bro out as a shill.  You seemed serious.  I respectfully disagree that golddustbro is not a shill.  I could be wrong.  This is a fantasy, annonymous monger fuck board...or you could cut golddustbro a break.

Golddustbro never ridiculed me back at NotAMPmaps and Nuerotic Donkey for being too verbose nor thrifty with my once a week trip to Wonderland.

I try to session only once a week.  I'm a sex addict named Twoontuesday.  I'm my own biggest problema.

I figure the solution is once a week although I can afford more.  Temperance is the solution to addiction.  

I appreciate CDL welcoming me to TER.  Thank you CDL for your warm welcome.

I'd like to take us off topic for a moment to discuss to three issues:

#1 shilling v promoting

Shilling is defined as deception of the audience by the shill who received a direct financial benefit from said deception.

You may call me Swoon instead of Twoon or Twoontuesday; because I refer to the kgirls as 'my beloved.'  If I give a shout out to my monger brothers about a returning fave or new flavor of the 'month', I can be labeled a promoter.  No deception.  No financial benefit from the kgirl / org.

Your input is appreciated Rocketbro.

I believe according to TER, a monger is permitted to promote a kgirl but not shill.  I believe Rocketbro supports promoting but is  fundamentally against shilling.

#2 it's ok to have two monger brothers naked in the same room having no rules sex with two enthusiastic, sexy and willing kgirls!  Let's agree that's not closet gay?  I have nothing against gay men.  It's just ladyboys don't appeal at all to me; EVER.

Ok to make fun of your bros, but it crosses the line when it becomes ridicule.

You may not be cool with the tag team idea, but don't label me as gay.  Not ok.

#3. Annonymous v full disclosure mongering

I've been full disclosure mongering for thirty plus years and haven't been burned yet.  But I'm also respectful, good looking, charming, magical and always show up with the correct donation amount.  Thirty plus years and haven't been burned once!  

Rocketbro says why the fuck should I tell the org my true identity if they won't share theirs with me?!  Seriously legit argument.

I had an extensive discussion with Rocketbro back at Neurotic Donkey and agreed that to each monger their own decision.  We also agreed that since I have 0 interest in the biZ side, that I should mind my own biZ and let the orgs set the rules to pass the gate.

Mind you, Rocketbro is legit.  I'm sure if he isn't already, he could get my recommendation to session with one of the candy kgirls at LSC.  LSC is now a private Club.  Membership has its privileges.

YMMV

-- Modified on 7/11/2020 8:54:14 AM

Twoon, CDL was going at the op of this topic, mufftime.
Just like with bp, he and mufftime have some history on here.

 
Promoting/shilling has a thin line, but in the end, we're here to discuss kgirls, so personally I dont mind people dropping their favorites, as long as there is no obvious pattern like theyre all from the same org somehow or some shit like that. I'm an easy guy in this sense, it's easy to see who tries to advertise girls vs someone who is just sharing who are his favs. I believe TER has rules against dropping an ad link, so we're good here (as opposed to the donkey) in that regard.

 
For example if waterworks DATY comes up, I'll almost always bring up Yuffie who is one of my top 3. She is the embodiment of the activity I otherwise don't really engage too much in. I also believe it's good intel for people who are read-only. Dropping a list of girls who are proficient in some areas (waterworks, DT, rim, etc) helps out people who seek particulars, imo. It won't be purely objective, but it will be close enough.

I've seen GoldDust on the other forum, I dont remember his name from donkey, but from his posts on the other forum, he will be a great contributor here !

Happy weekend bros !

confused about who is responding to whom.  Rocket is correct, I was responding to Mufftime.  Those that have been here a few years all know he is a well-known board shill (not just here, but on other boards as well) not to be trusted in his recommendations.  He is compensated for his shilling.  

 
Did your screen go back to flat mode?  If so, then its nearly impossible to determine who is responding to whom.   Made sure you are in "tree" mode and you will see the indents.  A post way down the board may be indented to one near the top,  Just trace along the "guide lines" on the left to keep it straight.  

Thanks for the reminder.

Forgive me for arguing, but flat mode is helpful when thread starts to bloat, especially on mobile.  
Tree view is impossible to read in mobile with 10 nested replies.  

As long as people keep the subject intact,flat view allows you to see last posts easily.

is that flat view now allows you to see threads very much the same way as you do in tree mode. I always use flat mode now for the very reasons you mention, but it wasn't always that way.

 
Until TER's last upgrade being in flat mode made it almost impossible to know who was responding to who and those people who viewed the boards in flat mode were constantly replying to the wrong people. I think most long term users here just got used to using tree mode, because the prior versions of flat mode made threads almost impossible to follow. Newer users like yourself quite naturally use the easier to follow flat mode while most older posters don't even consider using flat mode because being conditioned to it sucking balls. I kind of stumbled on it by accident a couple of years ago and I much prefer it to the current way that tree mode works.

I try to stay in tree until I end up with a message on the right side that is only two or three characters wide, then switch to flat for that particular thread.  You just have to remember to switch back  again.  

-- Modified on 7/14/2020 8:38:27 AM

Have been trying for over a week just to get a return call or text from any k-girl booker here in LA. Is there a secret knock? What do I have to do to pay a cute k-girl to let me bury my head in her privates for 15-30 minutes?

Feel free to PM me.

Did you supply references with your texts?

On your review history.  Without that, you are dead in the water unless you are willing to use employment verification.  If you're willing to give that up, then say so, and I'll tell you which org to go to.  

 
One org I know of is also accepting P411 verifications.  If you are approved there, they will let you see Kgirls.

Apparently the new Lydia from LovelyAngels aka Yuna from LA (not to be confused with Yuna from SJ) is a squirter. Thanks to GoldDust for his rebrand post on another forum!

 
Twoon, sounds like your type of girl

Bare with me on this as I'm just passing through and I couldn't help but stumble across this post...
So it's all about DATY, ok...but from what I heard don't a few of the K-Girls go BB? And isn't the traffic level kinda high?  I mean all those juices oozing out of her could be the last guys deposit, no?
I'm not big on the K-girl scene, although at one time, long ago it was a staple of my playing time. They're all I saw for a 3-4 year span...but back to DATY....I'm just curious if this hasn't crossed your mind.  
Anyways.......

-- Modified on 7/16/2020 8:02:26 PM

has a penchant for  getting snowballed and swallowing his own jizz.   For guys who are into that, I don't imagine its much of a stretch to worry about eating another guy's load as well.  Full disclosure, I'm only speculating.  Never tried either of these myself.  I don't knowingly see BB girls unless I'm the first dude of the day.  Even then, there is always the risk she spent the night with her outside boyfriend, but most clean pretty thoroughly before the first customer.