All My Opinion and I'd bet they say these things to all clients!

Why do some reviewers think Mongers looking for info about a Kgirl would give a fuck about any compliment the Kgirl gave them?
Even if the compliment is true, most likely it's just the Kgirl snowing the client, most of the time it doesn't help the review!

She said I was handsome, making jackoff sign, tell us about the Kgirl, that info is left out too much or vague at best!

She said I was big, they say that to EVERY guy and maybe that only half ass helps, need more info to let us know in a better way that she is magnum friendly!

These two things, IMO, are just the reviewer puffing out their chest and bullshit bragging!

Multiple 'O's is another waste in the review and is straight bragging! Saying what you did and what she likes to help her Cum, IMO, is helpful.

As it is TER gets a bad rap about its reviews from other sites and here too!

Anything to add to useless things in reviews?

END OF MESSAGE

I'm not a bit fan of reviews that seem to be more about the abilities of the reviewer, the multiple Os thing. But then again I wonder just how much people care about the whole IOP and IOI game. While I never believe it's real I do enjoy the fantasy and effort to make it seem real as part of the service.

 
Maybe some of these reviewers are trying to (but largely failing) to get that aspect of the session. Maybe thinking that just something like "great IOP/IOI" is not a good way to describe the session -- what would any of us think of "Had a good time. Go see her." from some random unknown reviewer?  

 
I know there has been a little discussion of it but perhaps both revisiting the old thread info or trying to come up with a good review writing style guide might be fun and helpful. But not offing to that or to make the effort to lead such an initiative - LOL

Burn!

I agree that the review is about describing a girl, not the reviewer. I don't care how big the reviewer is unless it's relevant (ie if there were issues with x or y size is an informative thing).  

I also don't really find the narrative structure too useful, although I don't want to seem like a review cop (ironically) to enforce styles lol. I like to describe the provider and then spend most of my time explaining what I thought stood out, what I thought wasn't good, and go from body to service and attitude. Then I'd figure - even if I might not repeat myself - who'd like this type of provider.  

 
With kgirls, there's a lot of similar routine and baseline services. I don't think I've seen a kgirl where a bbbj would not be standard. Hence you don't need to say that you had a bbbj, that's a given...but rather describe how it was. Same with shower and BT and the usual routine. It is expected that donation was exchanged, door opened etc etc. All of this is very standard protocol. What's not standard is the girl herself. If that makes sense.

So many guys use that phrase. It’s tired and worn out.

Agreed, very tired.

that makes sense.
I agree about how her skill is and should be part of the review, however you do have to add BBBJ, DFK's to satisfy the mods to get past a 7 score.
I also feel the same way about the standard/routine stuff, unless something special happened while doing the routine things.
 They have got past me a few times, and some of the routines have added to my reviews.

Or "Run, don't walk."
Or "Treat her right."
Or so many, many more...

First off its "blue toast" and its absolutely irrelevant for the review... But always good for a laugh along with how he later made her O!

Uses mouthwash before she dives in for a rimjob.