US sex guide / DMV board #9945
http://www.usa  sex   guide.nl/forum/showthread.php?33082-Agency-Discussion-and-Reviews&p=7432211&viewfull=1#post7432211

Based on what was described in post #9945, the agency’s behavior is completely out of line. Yes, the new client should have followed up and confirmed his appointment more clearly—there is no denying he shares some responsibility for the miscommunication. But even with that, nothing justifies an agency threatening to reveal a client’s personal information. Blacklisting someone for scheduling issues is one thing; using their private data as a weapon is something entirely different and absolutely unacceptable.

If the client’s story is true, the agency’s reaction shows a shocking lack of professionalism and respect for privacy. In this line of work, discretion is supposed to be a basic standard. Clients trust agencies with sensitive information, and agencies claim they take that responsibility seriously. To see one allegedly break that trust over a simple scheduling problem is not just unfair—it’s reckless and dangerous. It sends a message that the agency is willing to escalate a minor issue into a real threat, which should worry anyone thinking about dealing with them.

Even people who think the client handled things poorly should still recognize how extreme the agency’s response was. Miscommunications happen. Appointments fall through. But threatening to expose someone’s PII crosses a line that no reputable agency should ever cross. If what was described in post #9945 is accurate, then this agency has shown it cannot be trusted with even the most basic obligation: protecting a client’s privacy.

However, I am skeptical of the claims since my impression of the agencies here is they just don't get into arguments. If they decided someone is more trouble than value or a time waster they just stop responding, and maybe block the number.

 
I would also note that there is only the threat, apparently in retaliation for his threat to make some big issue publicly about the confused communications, which you agree he has some ownership for. So far, I don't see that any PII was actually ever made public so making the claim they failed to maintain privacy is a bit premature. Stick with they should not have made such a threat, which seems to have been made in the heat of the moment.

Holy smokes. Never thought I'd see the day. Gotta give props when they're earned.  

 
But then he says this was in response of threat by customer to make something big publicly? Huh?

Aren't these forums about discussing bookers too? Or are these boards just to promote shit? Don't customers who felt like they were not treated right - the guy claimed they berated him - have the right to post about their experience and warn others?

How is a threat of exposing pii info warranted in this case?

If I go to a business and am treated rudely by a receptionist I don't have a right to publicly tell others how I was treated? And now because of that the receptionist threatens to expose my HIPAA data to the world?

And somehow a bluff threat is better? How and why? How many people don't call this bluff (if it is a bluff) and don't post because of such a threat? Many people don't want to have pii exposed. This guy just had balls to call a bluff (if it is one) , and many people in his shoes wouldn't be able to.  

 
Anyway. I think that's completely unacceptable. The guy isn't a direct danger which imo is the only case where pii could be disclosed. This is just yet anther case of someone who is drunk with power leveraging something that they got from client under guise of verification. And now that's weaponized against them.

 
This is why I always advise never to give up your pii. Don't give people who only think in dollars any leverage on you that you don't have on them. They won't hesitate to threaten you, throw you under the bus or lie....all in the name of pieces of paper and their reputation (which is generally needed for green pieces of paper).

-- Modified on 11/3/2025 11:21:09 PM

I did say "if" and I have a lot of doubts about the post. But to me this whole PII and giving it out or not for screening is largely unrelated to that other post. The guy got into an argument because things were getting confuse and communications between him and the booker were not smooth. Did that need to happen? No.  

 
Regardless of anything that occurred before he got back to confirm his 4 o'clock appointment all the guys needed to do was 1) have his phone with him during the time he was supposed to be confirming the appointment and 2) just say "Yes, 4 works. See you then." or "No, cannot make it. I'll get back to you another time." There is no need to keep the booker on the phone explaining what you need to do with your day to make an appointment. Similarly, even if you are disappointed with some specific things, or just in general, don't make threats about posting about it. You don't need to tell the booker that and it will come across as the threat.  

 
If he had simply had his phone with him (again assuming this is even true) non of those texts saying he would be blocked or was a time waster would have been sent. If he had just confirmed, then did whatever he needed to do he would have seen the escort he seems to have really wanted to see (he'd been working on it for over a week it seems). The he could have been writing a review about the escort that might have been really helpful to others, and could have included a bit about the challenges in getting the schedule if he wanted to.  

 
But what has his post accomplished. Made public what was really a private argument that has not real meaning to others unless they are incline to communicate poorly, bring up completely irrelevant information for others and then participate in escalation of arguments when things are not going smoothly for anyone. Then others amplify the "threat of outting" that I dont think the booker ever intended to follow through on after the guy threatened to post a complaint (suggesting this was all the agencies fault). Then some people say they are not going to make appointments they were thinking of making so may well have been deterred from a session they would have really enjoyed.  

 
The post was a loose-loose event rather than any type of value added event.

 
PII choice is a different case and I'm sure pretty much everyone read already know what their own stance is on the PII in screening issue. Even wet behind the ears newbies who make even a slight effort to look for some information (or just ask) already know this. Shifting the focue of the other post to PII is really not helping them on that margin and obscures the equally important aspect of good and clear communication free from irrelevant details (what each of us has to do to make an appointment is our own thing and the agency doesn't need to know about it. Comes across as you are doing the agency some type of favor or something) and need to confirm details at the point of making appointments (how did the days get confused?).

 
But by all means keep making a big deal about some largely unrelated aspects of the reported situation rather than considering how others, particularly newbies, might avoid the mistakes the other guy clearly made. Keep amplifying something that is actually a side issue (not unimportant but a side issue to the other post but used to make a big deal for whatever reason the poster had -- get back at the agency? vent? IDK) that then has resulted in others making decisions that actually seem to be poor knee-jerk reactions rather than calmly thought out and so maybe miss out on a great time. But I suppose doing so make you think you're keeping your bros over hos uber alles cred alive (even when it's not really helping your bos out that much).

I take my props back then. I see you're back to fence sitting.  

To you the pii part seems like another issue, whereas it's the central issue here. Even your boy Klient said so in the op.

 
This isn't some "what did we learn today" shit, Jensen. The discussion is solely about how it's fucked up to use pii as leverage to threaten clients.

 
You really seem to think that any argument needs to remain private. Even if they threaten to out your pii. Wow.  
Yes, in your myopic view client never can talk publicly about bad shit the po tells them or threatens them.

In your view the client should just bend over and take it. How about no?  

 
If something happens to you where you think the po overstepped, why wouldn't you tell others about it?
PUBLICLY.

Yes now some people will not go there because they don't want to deal with a po who will use pii info to threaten them.

Good!  

This is a GOOD thing. This is how public feedback and reviews are SUPPOSED to work. Not this sweep under the rug under the table shit.

This is the point of these boards Jensen. Not meaningless small talk of "your favorite music/song". Not the advertising/promoting.  

 
But sharing of helpful and useful information. A po that uses pii outing threat is such information. And you're upset the client did this. The client did everyone a favor as well as shown balls you never, ever had to PUBLICLY document an issue.  

 
Yes your idea how to handle unfair situations is treating pos and agencies as omnipotent Gods and when they fuck you up, you bend over and take it. Like that time you scheduled came got the appt and got outright ghosted. You just took it and never even said anything publicly. Hence encouraging them to do it again and again to anyone they want. Because they can.  

 
As shown many times, many POs have short fuses, and are rude and mean to clients. And they tend to threaten clients with blacklist and pii outing. But to you this isn't a big deal at all.
To you it's all about doing everything that prevents the po from doing this. Not condemning the po and ensuring there's some incentive for them to never do this again.

 
No Jensen it's not a "loose loose" situation here. Consumer mistreatment should be stated loud and clear in public. Agencies aren't doing any of us a favor for selling pussy for $$$. We are doing them a favor for buying. They don't exist without our business. We exist without them.

Who made the first threat?

Why did you use AI to write your post?

It's a fact.  

A po should fucking know that anything he or she does to mistreat the monger can and will be used against them publicly. They really think they can talk shit to the customer from position of power. Fucking  cowards.  

 
Po literally has one job that can be done by a mоnkey or a chatbot. Yet somehow they have skin thinner than a mosquito dick and fuse shorter than one too.

 
Their job literally is to schedule appointments for women selling sex.

 
And don't get me started on this whole "threаt never carried out" BULLSHIT

If roles were reversed and client threatened to r&pe and beаt girls, do you really think anyone would wait to see if he were to carry on with that threаt? Looool. But of course yall have double standards. Mistreating girls and mistreating mongers are like two different planets to yall.  

 
You ever use a mongers pii as leverage you are a piece of shit and it should be known on every forum known to man.

But leave to people to still attempt to justify it and even lecture how to appease the po, instead of taking a shit on po for even ever making such a threаt.

-- Modified on 11/5/2025 1:29:38 PM

I've never needed or even wanted your props.

 
Yes, it was a loose-loose situation. And, not the original post was not all about PII. That post specifically says the guy told the booker he was going to publicly share his experience and what he saw as mistreatment before any mention of PII was made. He didn't say I got into an argument about messed up communications and scheduling that then the booker threatened me with exposure so I think I have to write this post to warn others.

 
The loose-loose is that the guy apparently have a 4 o'clock appointment with a provider he have spent a week trying to get to see. Seems like strong interest to me. If he simply carried he phone with him OR had just told the booker he could honor the 4 o'clock appointment he could have seen the girl and PII would never have been mentioned.

 
If he had seen the girl he could have recounted his experience which I suspect other might have interest in reading. Additionally, if he had said nothing about wanting to tell others about the booker's phone manners and just posted the that aspect of the exchange as he clearly wanted to, and did, no mention of PII would have existed. But he would have gotten that bit off his chest and aired the situation to others.  

 
All this drama could have been avoided, he could have seen the girl, his gripe probably would not have resulted in at least one other guy deciding not to make an appointment and that person did say he was interested. True, that decisions was based on the claimed threat of disclosing PII (and again there was not good excuse for that from the booker) but as of yet has any PII been disclosed? That, in my opinion is a red herring and was never going to happen anyhow.

 
As for the everything has to be made public. Bull Shit. The other guy claimed posting it was about fixing, not ignoring, a problem I agree that ignoring things seldom gets them fixed. But if he wanted to fix whatever problem with scheduling coordination and avoid confused communications and how to verify details to ensure everyone is on the same page about a schedule ALL that can and should be done privately between the two of them. If the problem keep happening even after that you have a good reason to make a public statement about customer service from the booker.

 
There simply is no way that telling some business you are going to write a bad reviews is a good idea or that it will not come across as the threat. The statement is very clearly saying "I am unhappy with you and I am going to punish you." Such statements are not about improving or solving anything. Moreover, its completely unnecessary as no one needs the other parties permission to make the post.

 
Just a stupid situations all around that resulted in less fun by several and I fail to see any where things are better from it.

You focus on avoiding the situation, ie appeasing the po.

What people are focusing is on po ever making a threat of exposing pii. If po has made this threat to someone they certainly will make it again. It literally doesn't matter what the trigger was.  

 
I don't give a shit about avoiding the situation. I'm not tap dancing to avoid hurting feelings of a cowardly piece of shit who threatens pii info they claim is for verification only to be using it as leverage.  

 
Yes, Jensen or Noworth, it's within customers rights if they feel they were offended to say you're writing the mistreatment publicly. But I forget you don't think customers have any rights. They are merely robots to you. And all comm stays private. No to the hell it doesn't. Air them bitches out.  

 
Again I ask you, would any girls or po want anything to do with client if he threatened to r8pe and beаt girls?

No, and I'd bet he would get blocked instaneously. And neither girls nor po would want to have to do anything with the guy regardless if his threat was empty or not. And literally no one woudld blame em.  

The same goes for po and threat to expose pii. There are people who wouldn't want to deal with po if in a conflict situation that do arise, po will resort to that.

And yet you have very different standards. Fuck your double standards.  

 
I am rooting so that po becomes physically and mentally unfit to ever do this again. Fuck that po making threаts like that.  

I am going to have a field day on that forum too.  You think the pos read the forum there?

Saying there was not need to say you're going to make public statements about how you thought you were treated in no way is avoiding anything. However that is why the PII threat even came up.

 
So instead of the loose-loose case there could have been a win-win case where the guy saw the girl he wanted to see, never got the threat and still had the opportunity to tell others about the way he felt treated.

 
then again, talking with you is like talking to a rock so why not change your handle and save a couple of characters.

Once again - you seem to unable to comprehend this.

There was a conflict. There will be more conflicts. This job by inherently is conflicting because sellers want to do it their way and buyers want to do it their way.  

The very fact of po trying to threaten a client with (potentially) ruining their life is what Is being discussed.  

 
You on other hand keep trying to lecture ppl on how to avoid the situation. That is Not what we're discussing.

 
What we're discussing is equivalent of me telling the receptionist I'm gonna write a negative review and the receptionist pulling out a knife or a gun and saying I will ruin your life.

 
This should never, never happen to a po unless the client is an immediate danger.

 
Pii is sacred and shouldn't be used as leverage, ever.

Instead you keep on trying to justify ruining someones life over posting TRUTHFUL account of them berating a client.

 
Whats that shit you said about me and discipline? Why don't you apply that concept to the po? Why can't the fucking po have some discipline and not threaten to ruin a clients life over something truthful?

 

Your version of win is avoiding conflict and not telling the booker that you're going to broadcast shit.  

My version of win is to make sure a piece of shit that has the gall to threaten to ruin someone's life over a public broadcast of a truthful event, is in a pile of shit. Got it?  

don't bow to bullies. strike back at them.

 
Imagine entrusting your private info to an entity that lies in your face about dеlеting it after verification.... and then holds it hostage.

That's what people don't seem to get.  

Nothing short of threat of physical harm or snitching to the police should *ever* have po even contemplating using pii as leverage.

If the po goes to that type of bag every time they are unhappy with what the client is saying, they shouldn't be po'ing. They should be bagging groceries.

Keep making up bull shit rocket -- NOWHERE did I justify making that threat.

Who made the first threat?

Let me preface this by saying that under no circumstances should a booker be threatening to post a client's PII. That's wrong, full stop.

That being said... the OP did make the first threat. Posting about a booker's rude behavior isn't a threat. Telling the booker that you're going to post it, however, IS a threat—or at the very least can reasonably be construed as one. To say nothing of the fact that it's pointless. What do you reasonably expect to gain by telling the booker you're going to post a bad review of her? You don't really think she's going to instantly change her tune, do you?

I'm going to write how you berated me publicly isnt a threat.

I already said it.

 
Note how you haven't yet said what po did is wrong. But of course you didn't. You are just another scumbag with double standards who thinks it's OK for po to say this but if it came to a threat of product or merchandise being hurt (girls) you would be first in line screaming.

 
Fuck the po and fuck you if you support threat of doxxing over anything that isn't a direct threat of violence and/or bodily harm.

I don't want to avoid situations. I want pieces of shit who put mongers life's in danger to be tarred and feathered.  

 
Calling the poster on the forum who said this a clown circus.
Insinuating that he's at fault for not avoiding conflict.

 
You keep focusing on," how to improve the situation"

You know how? Take the po and give me 30 minutes with them in a small room. They won't ever want to po again.  

Or just get a po who won't threaten doxxing and leave this po to bag groceries.  

 
Keep justifying threats of doxxing. Can't even bring yourself to day it's unacceptable in any but most extreme circumstances.

-- Modified on 11/6/2025 11:59:03 AM

So if I spend time trying to explain why locking your house doors and windows to avoid being burgled I'm now justifying people robbing other peoples houses? You really are disconnected from reason and critical thought.

 
I didn't call the poster a clown circus -- I said the discussion was one -- I would put you as the lead clown at this point. And there was no insinuation. He was part of a conversation that kept escalating. Unnecessary and the point was that he, from what he posted, could have accepted the appointment by confirming or simply declined at that point because he didn't like the bookers behavior. And then was free to write the post. Saying he was going to do so accomplished nothing.

 
Why I'm bothering to reply to the complete mischaracterizations you keep posting I don't really know but at this point TFATTT so go spew whatever more BS you want and claim it's helping someone.

Who the fuck cares what the reasoning is?

Maybe he wants to troll the Booker..
Maybe he wants to make the booker feel bad or feel for his /her job?
Maybe that's his way of responding back to the Bookers berating? Ie, his way of saying hey Booker fuck you and suck my nuts.  

All of these are fine with me.  

The moment a Booker starts insulting a client, a client is fine saying this or doing all this.  

If it was in-person conflict, spitting in their face would be fine too.  

And the po will have to have discipline to not use pii to not threaten to ruin their life. Because of they do all bets are off and we're ready for war.

why you shouldn't give out personal info.

That's what you're doing.

You offer "advice" on how he should've deescalated and avoided conflict. And yet you don't offer such advice to the po. You barely even blame the po even though the po is the one who did most of the escalation here.  

Youre being incredibly biased and it's showing.  

 
And I'm saying, once the po berates the monger, the monger is free to tell the po whatever he wants. He can escalate it as much as he wants and as long as he doesn't threaten physical violence, the po has zero right to threaten pii exposal.  

Because it's po who started it. It's the po who was impatient and annoyed and has lack of discipline. It's the po who escalated it and started berating the monger. When it's literally the pos job to do this. They get paid for this. Yet you offer zero criticism towards pos lack of discipline. If the po reads the forum, why not offer your criticism? But no, you keep lecturing the monger and have zero smoke for the po.  
Because that's what you do, perpetually.  

 
(When the fkg thread was still on here I also don't remember you condemning the po. And I vividly remember cks laughing at the poor monger who got berated for no reason for asking about services). You guys think it's normal to berate mongers., just because they can. And I think they should rexeice consequences.

 

You keep saying that the monger kept escalating but it was arually the PO when he called the monger time waster and berated him. That's a fact. In real life, many of these pos wouldnt dare to berate mongers to their face.  

 
You also keep on saying here and on there, how the lack of exposal proves it's a empty threat.  

Once again, let's compare it to a threat of abusing a girl. We don't have a proof of anyone carrying out such a threat. Do we? And yet I know for a fact no one would tolerate it.

So this is completely irrelevant and "red herring" as you would say. You keep downplaying Bookers behavior but keep criticizing the customers behavior and saying he should've avoided it. Why should you avoid conflict when someone insults you? Do you not have dignity?  

 
And it ALL stems from the fact that Booker is in a position of power and is gatekeeper of pussy. And your whole mantra is to not challenge people in position of power because they can can escalate the conflict. So all you ever do is try to deescalate and avoid the conflict. That is a cowardly strategy.  

 
And my position is fight the bully even if he's bigger than you and has more power. If someone berated you, you're free to respond back. Troll the po. Insult them back. Yet you want the monger to not respond back to an undisciplined, rude po whos drunk with power and lack of consequences of his behavior.

 
And when some of us want to hold the Booker accountable for his/her behavior, you want to call it a circus.

 
Just because you don't have dignity, doesn't mean other people don't. I won't let a Booker call me names and berate me without a response. Some people even wanted the mofner to apologize! Lol. Yeah he/she berates the monger but monger needs to apologize! How fucking cute. How about no. If you gonna berate me, I'm gonna berate you. Eye for an eye.

Yet more bull shit.

 
I get you live in a world where someone has to be blamed. For me, the booker is responsible for what the booker said. The customer is responsible for what the he said. The end result of the interaction was entirely avoidable. Saying that, and mentioning ways it would have been avoided in no way says one was victimized due to their actions or that either side needs to be blamed. You just need to have someone blamed. That is you error in reading what I've been saying.

post, you keep saying the *Agency* did this and the *Agency* response was or commenting on the *Agency's* behavior.
So, your links didn't go anywhere for me to get more information.
I'm asking does the PO own the *Agency*, or has the authorization to speak for the *Agency* given by the Boss or owner? Or just another worker on a power trip because they have the key to the Kgirls door? And the real Boss doesn't even know of this situation, or do you know if they do and are alright with whatever this PO says and does?

Is this agency known for this kind of treatment to other clients, or is it just the PO, and has it happened before?

 
Also, can you put up some good links, I'd like to read post #9945.

If the OP that is retelling the story from the other site is who I think, then yes, he probably knows the relationship between the booker and the agency.

 
That said, while I think stating the facts accurately is much preferred (the post on the other site only talked about the booker -- or if agency was mentioned it was only about where the booker was working IIRC). But even if the booker is just working there as an employee that would be a principle-agent relationship and the agency does own some responsibility for what the booker does while performing their normal job tasks.

 
But I don't think the agency is known for such behavior and in my interactions with them the booker has always been polite and professional. Others have said they have never experienced such a situation before as well. Most have said nothing about their interactions.

 
I'm not sure you can get a good link, I think the one provided is correct but you need to login to use it. But you can go to the site, navigate to the Northern Virginia location, scroll down to Agency Discussion and Reviews then (currently) go the the 6th page and scroll down to the post Caution / YMMV. ATM. The is the original report by the guy that reported getting the threat and the overall bad experience.

Why is that? In all your posts is how the client could've avoided the confrontation. Yet zero lecture towards po who most likely reads the forum too. Where's your advice to po how to avoid confrontation?  

You keep saying that po is responsible for what he said yet on the forum you spend 90% of your posts detailing what client should've done to avoid confrontation even though the Booker started to insult them.  

 
I don't see a SINGLE instance of you detailing what the fucking po could've done to avoid the confrontation. Where is it?  

If the client and po are on an equal footing here, shouldn't you be telling what the po couldve done? Yet not a fucking PEEP out of you on that front.  

 
You want to pretend like every conflict has no one to blame. I'm a simple man, someone insults me, I strike back at them. Your solution is to get on your knees and avoid confrontation.
And your solution somehow only applies to the client.  

What has the po done to avoid confrontation in this story? Where's your criticism of him/her?

This monger obviously isn’t the sharpest tool in the shed. Or maybe  he is intelligent but has trouble communicating with people (possibly on the spectrum?). At the end of the day this could have all been avoided if the monger didn’t threaten a PO who was holding the monger’s PII. Certainly that’s a fact pattern you could agree with?

Badger, I just tested and actually works but you have to take the spaces out of the broken up link in the OP.

I think you should back off on that type of post The poster on the other board has some share in how things played out and should have cut the booker some slack regarding the time waster comment -- there were probably other guys waiting in line for that appointment so the booker was in a difficult scheduling position. Earlier appoints were confused somehow so just moving on to the others since the poster was not responding with a confirmation was also a risky thing. But if the booker has to wait too long for the confirmation, and never comes, that appointment slot might not be filled that day.  

 
But don't waste you breath trying to get rocket to understand two threats were made. It's beyond his capacity to grasp the the tone and how someone else will interpret what is said because for him agencies and escorts are just objects and only consumers or his monger bro are to be trusted or entitled to courtesy and respect. Consumer is king and never wrong so the booker is just supposed to take it, bend over and ask for another. Which, BTW, is an actual quote, or very very close to the quote, from rocket from a few years ago.

Oh that's right - he did start to berate the client.

 
You think I'm going to take any of your posts in good faith ever since you laughed at a guy being berated by FKG PO? That guy only asked if Greek is available and got berated.

It's clear you're always going to be on pos side no matter what.  
Whatever the po does the client deserves it.  

 
Fuck the piece of shit po and fuck you if you support this.  

-- Modified on 11/8/2025 4:54:32 PM

-- Modified on 11/8/2025 4:54:58 PM

Just fucking excuses.

 
This is exactly what said you are doing. Deflecting like a coward.

 
Where's your lecture to the booker as to how he could've avoided the situation?

 
Nowhere to be found.

 
You said the booker is responsible for what he said. You said he shouldnt have said what he said, did you?  

 
WHERE IS YOUR ADVICE OR LECTURE TO THE Booker? Where is it?  

 
It doesn't exist because either you are too cowardly to tell booker what to do (ie you're a coward) or you think the booker did nothing wrong when he berated the client and then subsequently when he threatened the client.

Meaning, you absolve him of all blame.

Keep on bootlicking and excusing the bookers and blaming the customer for this conflict, Jensen. You're real good at it. Real good.  

 
 And lol at the pos as objects. Sounds like projection to me because that's what you treat consumers as.
Pos insults the customer? The customer should bend over and take it and avoid the conflict. The po berates the customer? Bend over and take it to avoid the conflict.

The customer doesn't take it and punches back? Oh now it's justified to use pii threats.

That's literally what you advocate. But it's me who's treating po like objects and not pos who treat customers like shit and dirt.... Lmao can't even make this up.

-- Modified on 11/8/2025 5:49:21 PM

I'll give it a try.

Thanks, Jensen. It worked great!

Gee, I don't know rocket. Maybe Not fucking saying they would out the PII -- I pretty sure I led off on my post here with that position.

 
But it wasn't the booker that posted anyone so we don't know that side of the story. Should I be like you and make up some story about how it all played out for them? However, since the claim was that the customer was going to confirm "around noon" the booker could have said "'Around' is not well defined. Please send your confirmation before noon or you might not be able to get the 4 appointment." The booker could have them texted at, say, 5 to 12, asking if the guy was able to take the appointment -- that would be a nice little reminder for him what time it was. If for some reason the guy reached out at 12:15 and got made that the appointment was no longer available the booker should just note that this was all explained before and should not be a surprise. If the guy gets upset and then threatens to tell everyone how they cancelled his appointment last minute the booker should simply say goodbye and hang up.  

 
If that scenario I don't know what the other poster would do -- I don't have the impression he would then lie about the situation an post that the booker unjustifiable cancelled his appointment, and they guy may not have even posted anything. But I am pretty sure that if someone took that situation and then posted how the booker was abusive and cancelled the appointment he had called and confirmed but then the booker posted with the truth, you would be the first to claim the booker was a lying scumbag and defend the liar.

I keep trying to see how long you can ignore this obvious point.

 
How about not insulting or berating the client? Why don't you mention it? Do you think it's acceptable for po to berate and insult the client?  

Do you not agree that insulting the client when the client cannot insult them back without being bld is power abuse?  

Why I don't see any lecture from you telling the po that he should not berate the client?  

Why do other customer facing jobs have no issues at not berating or insulting clients and have discipline and patience to do so. But Pos just itch to insult ? Oh let me guess - "because they can"?  

 
You and cks keep saying the po wouldn't have threatened pii info if the client didn't say he was going to talk publicly.  

What about the client not making that "threаt" if the po was polite and didn't berate or insult him?  

 
This is what I'm getting at and yet you're playing dumb. If the po avoids being a fucking dick, maybe none of this happens. Yet not a peep out of you. Do you think people like to get insulted without talking back?  

I did not make up any stories, what are you talking about? We're assuming the client is telling the truth.

So if anyone like some clowns on the other site wants a proof of a pii threat - I have it. He sent me screenshot of the exchange. I take this customer protection shit seriously.  

 
Hes a cool guy and basically told me he doesn't really have much to lose if pii gets leaked so that's why he put it out.

The Booker said they gonna block him for wasting time, so he said he will write a negative review. Then booker said he will release all his pics and numbers for that "bullshit"

 
Jaysinn is a gigachad too because even after that he was willing to see the girl at 4pm provided the booker would apologize to him. He basically demanded an apology. Fucking gigachad standing up to a bully.  

None of the usual suspect bootlickers would ever or could ever demand an apology like that. They think Booker is some authority you have to bend over and  take being shat on and not respond back. They'd crawl on their knees and suck a bookers dick (or clit). But hey, a coward dies a thousand deaths. A soldier dies but once.

-- Modified on 11/23/2025 6:07:46 PM

FYI
Jaysinn posted the screenshot on the other forum yesterday  

https://www.     usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?30737-Stupid-Shit-in-NoVa&p=7451229&viewfull=1#post7451229

Oh thanks didn't realize it. Must have been right after we talked.

Thanks.

You might also want to read a couple of posts down -- post on stopping the car. Does the admin know you're not in in the DMV or ever been to ATM? Didn't sound like it.

Trust me, I've had my posts moved into "stupid shit" plenty of times. It sucks because most people dont read that forum and the purpose of a lot of my posts is visibility. This is something you're averse to but I'm a firm believer in airing out each and every grievance publicly where everyone sees it.  

 
I want the bad actors to read me shitting on them. Just like I want sellers to read criticisms of their pricing model, performance etc.  

 
Anyway. If you want to tell admin about me, be my guest. Guy is trigger happy to ban, so be careful he might ban you for just telling about me if he's in a shitty mood.  

 
I've once had him snap on me merely because I accidentally clicked the "attach read receipts" and I was told to never use it when contacting him. I was like sheesh. Why even have that option.

Even though I posted strictly in "stupid shit" like I got directed to do, I still got banned.

Well, I know I went out sticking up for consumers. Always have always will.

Their playground so their rules but not really the type of thing I would ask for even if you annoy the shit out of me at times. But not something to be happy about and, much like the whole issue that was in the thread your participation ultimately resulted in the banning, an outcome that didn't have to happen and could have been avoided without anyone compromising their principles.

 
But given your comment on the other thread about trying to follow some advise offered may help avoid something like that in the future.  

 
In any case, have a happy Thanksgiving as well.

Happy Thanksgiving to you too.

Thought you might have been interested in my post, Ive found Ive been banned the moment I pressed submit, so it didn't go through. I did send it to Jaysinnn via a private messenger.

I'll assume you and Jay shared emails or something an not just communicated over the site PM. If so feel free to pass it on.

Yeah on telegram. We've talked for a bit and that's how I got his screen shots before he decided to post them publicly.  

I did sent that to him already.

And don't take it as an attack on you. I've said it before and I've said it again that you're not a bad guy. But it's worth noting whom the advice is coming from. I think you'd agree there even.

I hope you and any other mongers you know, have good holidays and have some great sessions with kgirls or any other escorts for that matter. Cheers.