First off it's not the K-girls themselves that are particular about who they see, it's the bookers who are VERY particular about who passes screening.

Secondly Nina hardly cares about it being a "great deal" from a customers POV, she is an indy provider who charges twice as much, but who looks to be worth every cent.

and thirdly and perhaps your most blatant error,  K-girls by definition are agency girls and are most definitely NOT independent.

 
You made four statements, the only correct one is that K-Girls are indeed Korean. Damn if you had only blown that part too, you might have set some kind of record. Come on fish, don't be a bogart, you need to share whatever you are on right now. lol

to these providers by consistent, if somewhat predictable, service, and attractive rates.  The girls come from a culture with an intense work ethic, so it represents excellent value per dollar spent for the customers.  

...K-fanboys overran the Los Angeles board with their non-stop adoration and exaltation of K-girls.  But that wasn't enough for the K-fanboys - they also had to trash so-called "indies," any provider who was not a K-girl.

To be fair, the worst behavior was by two K-fanboys who no longer post on TER, at least not under their original handles.  Today's K-hobbyists are a lot more "fair and balanced."