for the most part the k-girls and k-agencies are using it as a tactic to, in their view, get more business, by 'recycling' the talent.
This used to happen on occasion mostly with k-girls who had a few lesser reviews creep into their profile. But now it has become common even with gals with really good reviews. I understand what they are trying to accomplish - I am just observing that in doing so they run the risk of alienating good, established clienteleK-girls change their names or agencies bill them under different names.
I don't recall this happening as much not that long ago but in my market area it seems
that every visit or two the girl has a new name. Even a claim of it being a first visit
to the area.
most of these girls have good reviews so I don't get it.
There are girls I would love to see again - and honestly a number I would prefer to avoid - all of the "name roulette" is just not in good service to the clientele....
are not turning up reviews of K-girls as often anymore. And that some of the k-agencies that used to not be accepting new clients now are..... and this does seem to correlate in terms of timeframe with the increased tendency to re-label and re-market the talent.....
I agree and it's quite frustrating when they are advertised as first time visitors to the area. I know they do it to get more business for them and the so called "new" girl. Often times it's a girl I wouldn't have minded repeating with. However, several times it's been girls I had no intention of seeing again. Either way I'd just like to know who I'm getting so I can make the choice. When it's a name and pictures change I feel they are just pissing off good customers. I feel that hurts business in the long run as I no longer trust them and am hesitant to book new girls (wasn't before) until I have trusted info. Perhaps I'm wrong and it doesn't hurt business or they just don't care.
I don't know if it is the cause or the result of a decline in business but I think that the decline is definitely a factor one way or another. Some of these agencies were very UTR and did not take in new clients for a long time but have changed names and policies to allow new clients. The total number of reviews that they are getting has declined and some of those who apparently regularly frequented these agencies have either reduced reviewing or patronage. And yes I know that only a small fraction of people playing this game review but I believe that that ratio remains about the same.
So I don't know if this policy has contributed to that decline in the first instance or if it has been enacted as a result of that decline but there is some correlation.
Obviously the business model has shifted away from strongly catering to existing clients and toward trying to bring in new business in any case which does not seem to bode well for this sort of agency.
I have also noted a marked decrease in the overall quality of talent coming in. Not that long ago I would have gladly booked any new talent from a couple of my favorite agencies and known that in at least 80% and probably more like 90% of cases I would be delighted with the service, and worst case would still have been happy. Now I have become skeptical. I've been given pretty shoddy service on a few occasions now, something I never thought would have happened with these agencies.
Perhaps the decline in business in my local market is resulting in something less in the quality of talent wanting to work here. There have been a lot of times when there was only one girl available at some of these agencies which is also very unusual. Typically at least three at a time were available. And I have not seen re-visits from some of my favorites in a long time
...so that separate profiles can be combined and providers cannot escape bad reviews simply by changing their names.
If you read this board, you will see that K-fanboys do in fact know many providers who have changed their names. They know both the old and new names but absolutely refuse to report it to TER. They don't care about the accuracy of TER profiles or helping their fellow K-bros. Their loyalties are with the bookers and the K-girls, plain and simple.
and not want to lose their precious access...
my view is that 'access' starts to lose value when these kinds of games are played....
My favorite K-girl suddenly left her agency with no forwarding address.
The agency she was with said she moved back home to Korea.
She had told me how much she liked D.C and America, I had a feeling the agency wasn't telling me the truth or she told them she was going back home to avoid being followed.
I called every agency around and surrounding cities hoping she had merely moved .
After months of futile phone search and booking new gals I found no success in locating her.
When I noticed a blurry photo on an ad site resembling her breasts I called the agency inquiring if that was her with a new name. The booker emphatically claimed NO.
I booked her anyway.
My hunch was correct, my long lost temporary lover answered the door.
After my happy reunion I mentioned her booker claimed she wasn't working there under a new name.
She explained ........................ and asked me not to repeat the reason she left without a trace, or let anyone know her new name and location. Without hesitation or regrets I obliged.
When I was a teen I discovered there were often rewards and never pain for not divulging secrets and quite often bigger rewards with other Gals for not kissing and telling.
To this day I refuse to snitch on a lady's confidence trusted with me.
I couldn't care less what men think of my allegiance with women.
If I turn gay I might change my position, to each their own.
If you use your imagination with quantitative logic there are many legitimate reasons for a name change, even name changes at the same agency.
Very seldom do reviews factor into the equation among K-girls and their name changes.
Perhaps I've been lucky to have 98 % successful satisfaction with K-girls.
During my gutter days of youthful desperation and tasteless sex I was a good friend of a star Bimbo at a local strip club. She was definitely not Korean or Asian, come to think about it, I've never met a Bimbo Asian woman.
She had told me long before that night she pointed out her Dad entering the club, her family would be furious and disown her if they found out she was a stripper.
I asked if she wanted to leave for the night. She said No, he will never recognize her with makeup.
I asked what if he requests a lap dance in the VIP room. She said she hadn't thought of that and asked me for a ride home.
To avoid problems with name roulette it would help your cause if you let the agency know immediately after leaving, anytime you are disappointed with the Gal you visited.
If you keep your disappointment to yourself how would the agency possibly know you weren't happy?
If you had already expressed your displeasure with the booker it's their fault for booking you with her if she's using a new name.
If a Gal answers the door you had previously expressed disappointment with and she is using a new name, why not man up and leave?
When all is said and done and mice are separated from men, wouldn't you rather take a chance on irritating an agency rather than spending time with a woman you would prefer to avoid ?
I don't recall this happening as much not that long ago but in my market area it seems
that every visit or two the girl has a new name. Even a claim of it being a first visit
to the area.
most of these girls have good reviews so I don't get it.
There are girls I would love to see again - and honestly a number I would prefer to avoid - all of the "name roulette" is just not in good service to the clientele....[/quote
for the most part the k-girls and k-agencies are using it as a tactic to, in their view, get more business, by 'recycling' the talent.
This used to happen on occasion mostly with k-girls who had a few lesser reviews creep into their profile.
But now it has become common even with gals with really good reviews.
I understand what they are trying to accomplish -
I am just observing that in doing so they run the risk of alienating good, established clientele
Transaction declined
Unfortunately it looks like your attempt to purchase VIP membership has failed due to your card being declined. Good news is that we have several other payment options that you could try.
We thank you for your purchase!
Membership should be activated shortly. You'll receive notification!