We sometimes see on this forum a debate about certain claim that the critics dismiss as “no shred of evidence”. Typically the claimant would say that he knows some Kgirls intimately and dated bookers, thus had access to privileged info. But would you consider that “evidence”?  
  Let me try my narrative:
“I’m regular to a number of Kgirls for years. One took me to meet her parents. Another proposed to marry me. A third was interested in my offer to sell Brooklyn Bridge at half price. Oh, booker X is now my regular date. Btw, I have 5 years of solid reviews, and white lists, compared to some guy who has less than a year’s review. (Grant that he used different handle before.)"
   How’d you like my “evidence”? LMA

in five...four...three...

I think interest in Harpman has died down.  I just like fucking with the LAKS fake-review crowd.  I do hate pimping and shilling and trying to get newbies who don't know any better to go see particular girls based on fake reviews.  On the other hand, anybody who WANTS "evidence" on Harpman can PM me and I will send them the links. Or they can look up BigPapasan's old posts from a while back on the subject.    

I am a few months new here viewing and participating on this board.  While the inevitable fighting posts are distracting, after reading enough of them they do somewhat help me figure out who is credible and/or who is unable to support their proffered info.  Already, after a few months, when I see certain usernames in a thread I have a good sense of who are "must view" and who are "don't even click."  

Let's see. How many examples of NPD are being displayed in this post?

You know even less about medicine than you do about Kgirls.  Once you get your GED, you can go to college and then learn what a fool you are making of yourself with the cut and paste you are doing pretending to know something about being a doctor.  Just because you have this disorder doesn't mean anyone else does.  

I don't have to attack you.
Your  verbosity and pomposity do that for me.
That's why you can't resist responding.
You expose yourself with every word and
everyone is noticing it now

To defend yourself for your past actions with respect to the FACTS about you that are now common knowledge, you seem to be conceding those points, so I think my work here is done . . . for now.  You may continue your illusory speculations about me, and even if people are reading them, the smart ones have already determined that they are merely the ramblings of a has-been.  

i could actually be some 19 years fat white kid in Tennessee!  or old retired booker^^

Your work is never done.
Your NPD obsession won't allow it.
To defend against you?  
You gotta be kidding.

You're right. Everyone here probably bullshits and elaborates
to some extent but I bet the one who says the most is the
is the one does it the most.
I  don't even have to name names for this do I?

defending against your own reputation.  Facts are facts.  Speculation is nothing but hot air.

Your words are not facts and no one here considers
them to be facts. That being said it's good to see
you are true to form. You never disappoint. Here's
to all your stated successes. It's amazing you have  
time to post so much with all your successes.
Truly amazing. That was our first clue.

I have done this for awhile and seen k-girls just before they retired and returned home, and none of them ever said they were approach by  "Haprman" or anyone else and said that they had to pay royalties or anything else. You think if there about to retire that they would say something or tell you if something was really bothering them.  

We take these accusations with a grain of salt especially
when you take note of the source.

Its good that you have time for a little introspection.

I don't see any former LAKS girls of the month on your review list, nor do I see any that retired and went home with the possible exception of one, so where is all of this "experience" coming from with respect to this subject?  So these are girls you "saw" but didn't review?  How curious.  

Narcissistic Pee Disorder?

Basically. That seems to fit him as well.

You got to him now. He's even attacking your review
list which is actually pretty impressive including Love Kim
who, in spite of his claim to knowing her so well, isn't
even on his list. It's the ramblings of a desperate,
lonely wannabe whose every word is apparently not
to be taken seriously. He doesn't even understand what
a joke he's making of himself and he can'r resist due to
his psychological disorder.  Maybe  our disdain should  
turn to pity.

I would agree, but then I might be accused of being one of Harpman's "minions", or worse yet, Harpman himself. Oh no. But I guess all I can be called is a "coward" because I am using an alias.  
This is from someone who:
1. Has been a TER member since 2008, yet only started posting on the TER boards & reviews about 6 months ago
2. Discredits Harpman because of his intolerance to people who disagree with him, yet he is the same
3. Discredits LAKS members because they were banned from TER for "nefarious" activities (I think TER only bans posters who violate their posting rules, they don't investigate "nefarious" activities), yet was banned himself from TER
4. Claims he is the "first to admit he doesn't know everything" yet weighs in on almost every thread or starts threads to self promote, and gets into flame wars with anyone with another viewpoint (see #2)

How many times have I said I didn't start reviewing on TER until AFTER AF shut down in August of last year.  I saw Love Kim way before that and she was one of my 100+ reviews on AF.  The guys that have come over here from there know that.  You don't because you were banned for writing fake reviews.  BTW, they didn't ban members for just talking about writing fake reviews as you want to spin your story, only for actually doing it.  

1.  Everyone that has an IQ over 60 here knows I have explained several times that I have no need to post reviews on more than one site.  Its okay, people get old, and their memories fade.  I understand.  When I was reviewing on AF, no need to duplicate here.  Likewise with the boards:  over there, not here.  They're gone, now I'm here since the demise of AF.  The few hundred guys  that came over about the same time as me know me from there, and many are still trusted PM buddies that I exchange intel with.  

Alias or not, you seem to have gotten it  
exactly right. The more he speaks the  
more he exposes himself to all of us and
he's so consumed he doesn't even get it.

I brought up no one. You did that one
all by yourself. No one believes anything
you say but you are compelled to keep
going by your obsessive, narcissistic
disorder. It's a pity.

Facts? You have facts?
You really are  delusional aren't you?
Nothing prevented you from reviewing LK.
Only your lying delusional mind did that one.

I  never saw anyone write so much crap about himself
and in defense of himself in my life. Each post confirms
what we've been saying here.
Keep it up Connard de Porc.
The hole you are digging for yourself just keeps
getting deeper.
Hope this doesn't take too much time from your
very successful life. You could be on one of your
imaginary OTB dates but you would rather be
doing this to satisfy your need for attention.
Pathetic aren't you?

Notice his reason for not reviewing Love Kim.
He has been a member here since 2008 but  
chose to wait for that rag of a board AFAX to
do his reviews.  Makes a lot of sense doesn't it?
We know when he's lying. It's when he's posting
here. Not a doubt now.

Sigh, yeah -> I'm mainly here for the "sharing information and experiences" part and trying to help/receive help from fellow hobbyists.

more like Nano Penis Disorder

a time limit for reviews, so by the time I came here it was too late to review Love Kim.  I don't think it applies to your fake reviews, though, so you can keep reviewing anyone you want.

Do you talk to yourself a lot, or do you keep a mouse in your pocket?  Or is your reference in the manner of the imperial "WE"?  Are you a king or something?

We all know that's not true.

I'm no king but we all  know you're a Connard