Look at Jensen moving the goalposts completely. This topic was never about my review count. You brought it to deflect from the issue and spew falsehoods. How dishonest.
But I will answer his post. Just like I diligently always answer everyones posts. I have nothing to hide.
But will he answer my question? Will he able to say "the girl who faked a stomach cramp to bump some other monger is a shit practice"? Or will he predictably not say this? My money is on the latter, prove me wrong Jensen! And badger, may I say - a person who can't even admit publicly that shit practice is a shit practice, how can you trust that person to be objective? Which is what he claims to be.
Anyway
"If you are currently really high volume"
I'm not. I said as much in this thread. Of course, you probably misread it. Am I going to get as much as an apology from you? I doubt it.
"Which is it? No high volume now"
Literally, in the post to ravioli I've said "Keep in mind I'm not a super high volume monger". Do you know what that means? Last time you tried to tell me "dishonest" was not the same as "not honest" and you're trying to somehow say I said I'm a high volume monger? I was never a high volume monger even before covid. Much less now.
"You have no problem questioning KR regarding the the case where he says he knows someone was bumped."
I simply asked how he felt about knowing the girl lied to get him bumped, and fucked over another monger. I have no qualms with him still going to the girl or the org. I wouldn't ever go back to the girl,but thats me. I merely asked how he felt about it. I was interested whether he felt some guilt or not. How do you know what I said to my "friend"? I gave him an
advice to not see that girl again. And of course I was upset.
Again, my suggestion is that if such situation happens, just like with everything else, is to loudly post the girl in q name on the most active forums. Than I'd be happy as a clam. As long as everyone now has the info that girl X can cancel mongers and lie to them, and so mongers need to schedule at their own risk, I'm happy. And the girl has to be named. No wiggling out of that one. I know you and cdl have some, um, struggles, when it comes to naming girls and orgs in public.
"Perhaps you just saw the lady yesterday and they took all the links down over night when they started vacation.... "
I saw the girl recently and was in process of writing a review. The other day I was about to submit the profile with review, and was copying a link and the link said vacation. Look at you grilling me. Why do I have to detail to you my appointments? Did I ever ask you any details of any single appointment you've made? Did I ever question your number of reviews or anyone else's? I've only asked you once whether you were willing to detail a bad quality session publicly and you never able to do so.
" Same situation but a different response because it involved you and your friend?"
In my situation my "friend" didn't know whether it was the org or the girl. And I've called out the org in question, if you remember. We've yet to hear who the "fake stomach cramps" girl is and what her org is. This is the difference here.
"And, as has been said by me and others to you many times, if you keep giving your money to those claim are so terrible *you* are part of the problem"
If I do that, I'll stop giving money to every org in the bay. Then what? And I've done it for a long period of time, even though it was a result of pandemic. The shitty practices continue.
You again moved the goalposts here. We were discussing whether or not the practice is good or bad. Once again, I ask you to answer unequivocally, is a girl lying that she got stomach cramps and canceling on a monger for a bump, a shitty practice? Yes or no answer. If you can't answer that, your answer becomes a "no". You chose to attack my credibility and character instead of focusing on the simple question. But what else is new?