According to the booker, Megan worked 5 days in January, then went on vacation.  Nuri worked 26, but we will round it down to 25 so you can keep up with the math.  IF Megan had worked the same number of days, and stayed at the review rate she had for the five days, she would have had at least 40 reviews.  You're Mr. Archive, so when was the last time a girl had 40 reviews in one month?  That's a LOT more than the 14 legit reviews that Nuri had.  There are other top girls that had as many  as Nuri, but nobody had the 40 that Megan would have had.  For the record,  from Megan's list, I only personally know Benny and Pornstar are legit reviewers.  I assumed two of the others from the content of their reviews.  Further, never had OTC time with Nuri, and finally, if a girl changes her name, AND I SEE HER AGAIN UNDER THE NEW NAME, I will write a new review.  The November review was Luna K, I missed seeing her during the short YaYa period, and saw her again as Nuri.  I don't think I violated any TER rules.  I ONLY review girls that I have seen under the name I am reviewing.  

 
It appears that the tin foil hat you wear is not protecting you from the rays coming from the black helicopters.  You  can spin whatever conspiracy theories you want, but you have never seen a Kgirl, so your "opinions" are pure conjecture.  What evidence do you have that anyone conspired to do ANYTHING with respect to Nuri in order to show that your post is more than just sheer speculation?  If you have no personal knowledge, then you should STFU, don't you agree.  (If you don't agree, then I will find a link to one of your ;posts where YOU said that to someone.)

 
This is really embarrassing.  I don't want people thinking that I have the dumbest stalker on the planet.  When you embarrass yourself, you embarrass me, too.   If you don't get your shit together, I'm going to announce open auditions to replace you as my stalker.