That was enjoyable. He used a fake glam. Hers is representative with Photoshop? I think she's very pretty.
She's not a working girl; but as a fan boy of Korean women, she's certainly GF if not wifey material. I'd like to wake up in the morning with her warm and sexy naked body next to me. One can dream...
there are some gorgeous Asian indies that will do an overnighter and wake up with their sexy naked body next to yours. You can make this dream come true. If you can get a Kgirl to date you outside, overnighters can be great. Just be prepared to see them without their makeup. In some cases, it can be a shocker. Lol
I remember some well known mongers who claimed they had overnights with kgirls. It was back in 2013 and 2014.
Generally, they said they slept at the incall. And then did the walk of shame (not my term - maybe we should call it the monger sneak?) in the morning. Though a couple of guys claimed the girls came over on their day off. One poor slob eventually got caught by his wife (he did overnights with kgirls when his wife was out of town - or at least he thought she was).
I have no real interest in doing sleepovers here in the Bay Area. It’s just more trouble than it’s worth. Though it would be really sweet if I could do that in LA or San Diego when I travel there.
But overnights require a certain degree of compatibility, too. So, I’d have to know more than a little about the girl first.
Though I confess I’ve done this in São Paulo and Bangkok where the mongering scene is quite different. Not with kgirls, though.
-- Modified on 6/19/2020 7:01:24 AM
-- Modified on 6/19/2020 7:03:44 AM
But in other parts of the country overnights are most definitely available at the incall, I have done numerous overnights with K-Girls.
A word of advice if you don't want that "shocker" in the morning. Don't stay for coffee/tea/breakfast in the morning. Just get your morning sex and head for the door. lol Yes, just like strippers a lot of these girls, especially the ones who are pushing forty don't pass the "light of day" test. lol
When creating a profile, the reviewer has five possible answers for "Photo Accurate?" He can choose from: No Photos, Photos accurate, Not Accurate, Not Accurate (Photoshopped) or Photos of another person.
The reviewer shouldn't be afraid to give an honest answer. His duty is to inform his fellow hobbyists what to expect the K-Girl really looks like. That's what TER reviews are for. Unfortunately, some K-fanboys go along with the booker/org and choose "Photo Accurate" even though they know it's not true. They do it either because they are afraid of being blacklisted or they want to keep playing golf with the booker.
Man up! A hobbyist's loyalties should be to his hobbying bros, not the bookers/orgs.
Did you learn ALL of this writing your three reviews? That's THREE reviews in 15 years!!! That certainly makes you an expert in setting up profiles, doesn't it?
Tell us about your experience with bookers/orgs. Oh wait, you don't have any. THAT sure makes your advice valuable. I still want to hear what you told Carla to get the fake whitelist. She's embarrassed to talk about it. Do you somehow think a fake whitelist is less offensive than a fake review?
..."News flash!!!! Bashing ME is still not debating my content."
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/politics-and-religion-39/thats-your-reply-----363149?page=1
"I see you are bashing...rather than attempting to refute my account..."
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/politics-and-religion-39/i-see-you-are-bashing-----363139?page=1
Put some ketchup on YOUR OWN WORDS - they'll go down easier, you stupid hypocrite.
What did I say that was NOT factually accurate? Since when is telling the truth considered bashing? Would you rather me tell lies about you? You need to go back to posting school young man. I suggest you spend a little time on the Newbie board. You seem a little over-sensitive about these facts. Facts are dispositive. They can't be debated, and they certainly don't constitute any kind of attack. They may be embarrassing, but that's not an attack. Why have you gotten so thin-skinned all of a sudden. You seem to be able to dish it out, but not take it. That seems like cowardly behavior, and I know you're not a coward, at least I think you're not until you prove me wrong.
So we can take that as a concession by you that everything I said was factual, which is what I said, so again, WHERE is the bash? There isn't one, so time to crawl back into your sewer.
You had no content to debate. Your posts about bookers and orgs are not credible, because you have no experience at all. This is the Kgirl board, not the fake white list board.
...refute my post so you distract and deflect with "fake white list" bullshit and you-don't-see-K-girls-so-your-post-isn't- credible bullshit. Exactly what is it about my post that is NOT credible? Why did my post get THREE likes if it NOT credible?
What does "fake white list" have to do with my post? You claim "fake white list" is a FACT. PROVE IT. While you're at it, PROVE that you play golf with bookers. In fact, PROVE that you play golf at all.
credentials or experience to support what you are saying here in the way of Kgirl advice or dealing with bookers or orgs. I said you have NEVER seen a Kgirl, which is fact. If you DO have experience, then by all means, tell us what it is that qualifies you to give advice on dealing with orgs and bookers. If not, maybe you should STFU. You're a kgirl hater, and you have nothing but contempt for those of us that see them. Why are you even here other than to troll this board?
On the drop down list part, I was obviously just mocking you. I thought it was pretty funny because you were taking yourself so seriously repeating all of the choices on the drop-down list.
I have invited you on another board to bring Carla here and have her back up your claim that she saw you recently and that the fake white list is not just a scam. Now that she knows that I know, I doubt she would.
...my K-Girl experience, or lack thereof. So how can you say "I did refute it"? It's simply more of your bullshit. You do know that other people can see both of our posts and can see what my post was and what your reply was.
YOU are the one bringing up the red herring of a "fake white list" which has absolutely nothing to do with this thread. Therefore it is incumbent on YOU to "bring Carla here." I don't have to "back up my claim" because I'm not making any claim. She whitelisted me - anyone can see that for themself. Do you want to keep making a fool of yourself about something totally irrelevant to this board? You can do that or you can "bring Carla here." Put up or shut up.
to your little whitelist scam, so I'm not going to do its again. Its easily searchable here. What is your justification of giving Newbies advice on how to interact with bookers and orgs? That was what you did. Do you want me to link to it. Its on THIS thread, or did you forget already. Why not just give advice on brain-surgery. You have just as much knowledge about that as you do about Kgirls, bookers and orgs. If you want to establish your cred to make the statements you made, just tell of the bookers and orgs you have personally done business with. I will be the first one to suggest you are qualified to give advice here. Otherwise, your advice is worthless. There is no other way to say it. That was my one and point on this whole exchange.
I see bringing up your whitelist scam is getting under your skin. Not the complete and total meltdown from you I was waiting for, but its a start. You have brought up fake reviews a lot in the past. How about going on record here and condemning fake white lists as being just as dishonest as fake reviews? You keep avoiding the topic. If you don't feel they are, how about explaining the difference? Your white-list scam is not irrelevant to this discussion as you claim it is. You want to be believed on your Kgirl, booker and org advice you are giving, so whether you SHOULD be believed is highly relevant. That goes to your overall honesty as demonstrated on other posts you have made on TER. If you weren't honest before and tried to scam providers into thinking you recently saw Carla, why should we think you advice now is honest. When you're giving advice, you past veracity is a factor in determining whether to give your advice cred or not. On this board, you have little or none. The white list lie just confirms that, so it IS relevant.
His post is correct tho no matter what issues you have with him or what he thinks of kgirls.
Photos accurate being only available to first reviewer is an oversight by TER. It shouldve been a field in each review. There are many for which the field is completely incorrect, and many times you're not sure if that was on purpose or not.
This is why I say mongers looking for kgirl eye candy are basically rolling the dice. Even relying on reliable monger info via pm or reviews is questionable. On std board I've seen a monger who writes good, reliable reviews, say that Allie at M looks her pics but with ps. Allie aka Nicole looks nothing like her pics at all. She looks old (not just is, but looks old) and her face literally is nothing like the pics. Nose, forehead, etc. She gives good service and she will satisfy bb hounds. But point is, one of the first things I know eye candy searchers look is how close the pic is to reality.
...to rebut what I said. He "attacks the messenger." He bring up red herrings like "fake white list" which doesn't have anything to do with my post. I don't have to say anything negative about him - his posts do it for me.
cred, which is important to determine that likelihood of whether you are lying or not.