a robust woman. That's the kindest word I can think of to describe woman who's overweight. I put her at about
140 -145, and at her height, that's just no good for me. I've seen a lot of girls that were 140, but they were 5-10 to 8 feet tall. That doesn't diminish the fact that it was the rim job of the century, but once I experienced it, there was no need to go back and see a girl that was too chunky for me.
I'm ready to return to monger since fear of Covid and want to take the plunge starting with a delicious KGirl. I've seen Cami and she was a smoking hot milf. Still a little older than my liking but I love man mades and hers was amazing. I saw that Amber's photos look amazing but hesitant since everyone says she's older. For those that have been both girls, is Amber older looking than Cami? How's her body compare? Photos show a really athetic body which I like.
The last time for Amber was at the beginning of this year, so its been 8 or 9 months. The last time I saw Cami was 11 months ago, so I make no warranty that either one hasn't changed since then. Amber was off nearly 4 months for Covid, but I have no idea if she is still the same as depicted in the photos, which is what I enjoyed when I saw her. Many times, during extended vacations, Kgirls put on a few pounds. Cami is a little full of herself, knows she's smoking hot, and so her personality put me off a little. Amber is more engaging, flirty and playful, at least with me, she was. As far as beauty, Amber was a 10 for me, Cami a 9. For service, I gave Amber a 9, Cami an 8. The link to my review of Amber is below. You have already seen Cami, so my review for her is irrelevant.
Thanks for that insight. Sounds like I'll need to visit Amber then. Based on reviews it does look like Amber put on a few pounds but from pictures it looks like Amber is more fit than Cami. Would you say Amber is older than Cami?
in their mid to late 30's, but I did not see ID on either one of them. I only see ID proof of age on about 60% of the Kgirls I see. I can only estimate on the rest based on the 800+ Kgirls I have seen.
Excellent post! This is the type of public post I lm talking about my dude.
a get-fit regiment last month because she felt she had gained couple pounds over the shut down period. I told her she looked great to me before she left on an extended vacation last month.
Been seeing Amber and Cami regularly for the last couple years. If you want an over all GFE experience, then its Amber hands down. I have reviewed both providers. Amber is older than Cami.
I should make a point to see her again this coming month. Re-reading my review when I posted it here a few days ago gave me the itch to see her again.
I saw her this morning. As hot and slim as ever. I told her about this thread and she gave me a cute giggle.
Have seen both, Amber over 7-8 times, Cami once, both are good, Cami was a little less engaging, Amber is soft and slow, less aggressive thpe but super GFE.
For those of you who have seen Heri, what about her? She has been on my radar for years but always ended up seeing ATFs, please share some input on her.
Yes, I saw her once and wrote a review. Her pics are outdated and not represent her today but I did have a very good time.
Amber is the probably the most attractive K-Girl I have seen in 10 years. She is on the older side, maybe 40-ish. She wears her age well, beautiful face and killer body, slim but curvy. And her slow sensual routine drives me crazy. Very skilled. Decent English and very friendly and playful. One other thing that she does that is very GFE: she calls me by my name, not honey or sweetie.
she has this signature move where she gets you on all fours and then gets underneath you and grabs your loverod with two hands and starts blowing you like a trombone. turbo superspeed twisting action. then moves up and get behind you and grabs your about to explode loverod and bends it back to repeat the trombone action. i always blow and give her a nice drink of my love juice in that postion. then chill to go for 2nd round of bang session.
the chick is a pro hooker. knows how to pleasure a dude and likes to do it. told me story about her life and no sad story. the girl just likes being a ho and making money.
for me if i has looking for hot sex with a cute fun girl i pick Heri over cami or amber. if gfe and looking to marry then don't pick heri. that chick loves money too much. hahaha
Can you go a little more specific? Her new pic on gardenksecret looks good. How is she comparing to Amber, Lora, Stella?
Thanks
Heri's long review history has noted that her weight fluctuates a lot. She is currently a bit more of a fuller figure so, not really a match of her photos she still uses.
However, her skills still hasn't diminished. I still very much enjoyed my time with her last time. She also did encourage me to visit rest of J's girls if I haven't already, which was nice of her.
I saw her years ago and I didn't repeat because she was about 30 pounds overweight. However, she is the ONLY Kgirl I ever let rim me for more than a minute. I'm usually not into it. She went for at least ten minutes and almost made me blow with her tongue in my ass. Heri's rim job is a bucket list item for any serious monger.
*takes note and puts Heri on tdl* 
You won't be sorry, I promise you.
I don't like being rimmed, I LOVE getting rimmed lol.
A girl who knows how to rim well will nearly always be in some sort of my rotation. There are some non-kgirl working girls that I go just for a rim and bbbj.
I'm always on lookout for girls who rim, and especially the ones who enjoy it or at least act like they do.
So what was your reaction when you first saw Heri? I did see her during the summer and wrote a review. I too was a little surprised but did have a good time with her.
a robust woman. That's the kindest word I can think of to describe woman who's overweight. I put her at about
140 -145, and at her height, that's just no good for me. I've seen a lot of girls that were 140, but they were 5-10 to 8 feet tall. That doesn't diminish the fact that it was the rim job of the century, but once I experienced it, there was no need to go back and see a girl that was too chunky for me.
You gave this cow a NINE for appearance, AND even though you really didn't seem to be too happy with how the session went you still gave her an 8 for performance. Even on your 7-10 scale, this does NOT look like a review written for the benefit of the guys who were to follow you in seeing her. On your 7-10 scale, this most definitely reads as a 7-7 review to me.
Sorry dude, but at "5'3"-5'5" in height, 140-145 lbs is not "robust" it's FAT. I think you owe the members here a belated apology for that review. I can't think of a review that better makes Rocket's point, no matter how inartfully he has gone about trying to make that point.
Things change, girls gain weight.
Read CDL's post, he plainly says he "never went back" despite his comments in 2015 stating that he was willing to give her a second chance. If he claims she was/is 140-145 lbs, those are 2015 stats and who knows just how fat she might be today.
Sorry, but you aren't making much of a case for her, or for CDL for that matter.
In the famous words of Ricky Ricardo, Come on CDL, "you've got some 'splaining to do." lol
Saw Heri couple months ago. I didn’t considered her to be fat just a bit overweight. She might have lost some weight after CDL saw her.
I think calling a girl terms such as "cow" or "bovine" is going a bit too far, but maybe that's just me.
But regarding cdls review, yes, cdls reviews tend to do that. Going by his own scale and talking how he doesn't like fat girls, putting a 9 for appearance doesn't make any sense.
My review is accurate. I looked at my notes that were written the day of the session. I had her between an 8 and a 9 and rounded up, as I sometimes do. She was young (probably one of only girls I have seen was legitimately under 30 when I saw her) and she had a beautiful face. I DID say she was curvy, which is the term I used at that time to denote that she is overweight. Now I use robust. I also said her ass (hips) were rounder than you NORMALLY see on Kgirls. I may have gotten my weight estimate wrong IN MY POST, but the comments in my review are accurate. Maybe she was 130-140. I never try to pick them up and carry them to the bed when they are CLEARLY over 100 pounds, so I'm estimating the weight from memory since it is from a visit five years ago. You can call her fat if you want, but you didn't see her, I called her curvy with a bigger ass than you normally see on Kgirls. That was as far as I was willing to go. A lot of guys saw her from my review and were not disappointed because I warned them she is not slender, so I stand by what I wrote. Some guys like the Kgirls with Latina asses and others, like me, don't.
My notes said "Repeat?" At the time, I thought I could, but a few months later, enough guys had told me that she had gotten bigger, so I just couldn't pull the trigger on going back. She got an 8 for performance because eight is average, which means some of it (the rimming) was once in a lifetime (it literally was for me), but her adherence to the script put me off. Combine the high and low points together and it was average overall. What else can I say? My review is accurate as to what I experienced THAT day. I didn't consider her to be below average in either looks or service, and I think the content, when reviewed as a whole, reflects that. 7-7 would be below average on both counts. She has 220 reviews with an TER average of 8.65. My average was 8.5. Did the other 219 guys get it wrong, too? I would say my view of her is consistent with others. Other posts on this thread substantiate that she has weight fluctuation issues. I don't think I got anything wrong. When you're just reading reviews rather than writing them, you may have a different view on how to evaluate the content. Personally, I wouldn't know.
Here you go appealing to the masses.
The simple gist of it is that you gave a girl you yourself admit not fitting your body standards and preferences, a 9 in looks. Who gives a shit about what her average score is and what the other 200 guys thought? It's your review. You aren't here copying homework off someone.
Your review is supposed to reflect your own opinion and correspond to your scale. For example, I like service-oriented girls. If you see a performance score of 9 from me, best believe the girl is dynamo in bed. There is a chance of death by snu snu.
Likewise, one expects to read your review knowing you don't like fat girls, and not find any fat/curvy girls with rating of 9 for looks. It's pretty simple.
girls into the same basket. For me, standards and preferences are two different things. She meets the "standard" of a curvy Kgirl, which is how I described her. The fact that she is not what I would have preferred through the more recent years is immaterial to whether she has the standard. Why don't you see her and grade her for yourself. She's got plenty of 9's and a handful of 10's form others. I'm not the only one who found her pleasing despite being a little thicker, i.e., curvy.
Here you are arguing that its MY score, and looks are subjective, but then you are arguing that you won't accept MY score when you haven't even seen her yet. How duplicitous does that make YOU look?
Yet you still used the majority opinion as a crutch, for some reason. Do you go with the majority opinion over your own eyes?
I didn't say anything about accepting or not accepting your scores. I said that for someone who touted your own review scale and bragged that you don't fuck and don't like to fuck fat girls and prefer slender/petite girls, this review certainly doesn't support that stance. I have no idea how you grade, because your own criteria doesn't match your actions.
It does look hypocritical, which is what Gag called you out on.
Speaking for myself, and from EVERYTHING you have ever said up until right now, if I had booked a session with her expecting a "9" in appearance based on a review from someone known to prefer svelte women, I would have been VERY disappointed and I'd be PM'ing you to ask you WTF???!!! 130-140 lbs on an Asian girl who is 5'5" at the tallest is still what I (and you) would call FAT, or at the very least if you were trying to be nice, she would be considered THICK, very thick. lol
I have always said I agree with many of Rockets points, but not his tone, and this is more proof that he really has some valid points where it comes to reviews written apparently with the intent to be "nice" to the providers feelings instead of watching out for your fellow mongers backs.
And please don't try that bullshit that just because I don't write reviews I don't know how to read them. That might fly with a newbie, but not even BLPOS tries that weak ass shit with me.
I still agree with "most" of what you say, but you are simply wrong on this one.
Lastly, do you REALLY keep fucking notes on the women you fucked YEARS ago??? Dude, WTF?
On this one. You just said on another thread that scores are worthless to someone like you because they are so subjective. I have always said, "Looks are subjective but we should all know what good service is." As Rocket says, its MY score, so who the fuck is anyone to challenge my interpretation of her looks (the good or bad) until they have seen her themselves? If you see her, which is doubtful, THEN tell me if you think I got it wrong. (What would you say to the guys who gave her 10's?) Otherwise, you are coming off as an arm-chair quarterback on Monday morning complaining about stats that you did not help create. Arguing that YOU can interpret the words better that I use in my reviews is not even a reasonable postulation, much less a fact. The fact that there is nearly zero chance you will ever see her, your argument is merely academic anyway. So until you have seen her, GFY.
Yes, after AF went out of business and I lost my 400+ reviews on that site, I started saving my notes I make after the session to assist me in getting the details right in the coming review. I did not save notes on those 400 and now I have no way to retrieve them or write them over again. It like the guy who's garage collapsed in an earthquake and so he goes out and buys earthquake insurance afterward. The notes are my insurance against TER going dark. If I wrote 3-line reviews like a lot of guys, then it wouldn't matter, but to get the details right on the comprehensive reviews I write, if they disappear one day, I will still be able to refer to my notes for guidance in the future. As I approach 900 Kgirls, there are names that will pop up today that I think I saw during those first 400+ reviews, but without the reviews and without the notes, there is no way to be sure if I did see her, and what I thought of her if I did, or whether its a completely different girl with the same name.
And this thread just serves to prove my point, if a guy with similar tastes to mind, like YOU, can still score a fatty with an appearance score of a 9 it proves beyond any doubt how useless the numerical scoring system really is.
YES, your description of the girl and of the session would have been plenty reason to dissuade me from seeing this girl, but judging strictly by the numerical scores of someone like you who has the same taste as me, (except for you fucking old broads of course) I "might" have been tempted to see her based on a score of 9 by you on appearance. After reading this review and the aftermath here, I would not make that mistake again however. lol
As for taking notes, ALL the thousands of different women I have seen in the past are right there, "in the past" I make small notes on my contact list next to women I have seen, but every few months I clean out my "contacts" on my phone and if I have a girls phone number that I haven't called for a year or more I typically delete her number along with my brief notes because it's HIGHLY unlikely that I will ever see her again. Of course TER going dark again won't affect me anywhere near as much as it would affect most of you. I see "mainly" SB's now and I only see maybe one hooker a week anymore, and most of them are NOT TER reviewed although a lot of them are K-Girls
perspective because you don't need to remember the details for a review, because you don't like them. As was shown by this exchange, even having ONE questionable detail in a review can ignite a firestorm. I made a lot of mistakes early on when I was reviewing on AF. One was not waiting a few weeks before putting up my review, because I could not maintain anonymity when the girl still had a clear idea of who I was from the many details I include in my reviews. This is why I stopped reviewing indies, although I do have two among my TER reviews. The other was not remembering important details when I actually sat down to write the review a few weeks later, so I started making notes as soon as I got back to my office or home, and sometimes even before I left the parking space at the incall.
The delay in writing reviews means that, since the time that I saw that girl, there have been at least 6-10 more that I have seen. As of this moment, I have seen 6 girls that I have not yet reviewed. Some are standouts, and I may not need to refer to my notes, but I have the biggest problem remembering things about girls that were average all the way around. Two average girls three weeks ago can easily be mixed up when I'm county solely on my memory. I'm the same age as you, and if you don't have the same kinds of recall problems with the volume you do, then I envy you. If I repeated with the girl before I write the review, then I don't need the notes to make it accurate.
I am sure I told you the story about the chica in Costa Rica that I fucked one day, saw her in the bar the next day and invited her upstairs "again" without remembering at all that I had already fucked her less than 24 hours earlier. She was PISSED that I couldn't remember her from only a day before, but she fucked me good enough that next time that I still remember her now even after all this time.
That still doesn't excuse your first statement about the "curvy" girl that you first described to us as being 140-145 lbs that you have been trying to walk back ever since.
I remember her 5 years and 200 Kgirl reviews later, and I already stated I'm guesstimating the weight, so I have no reason to think I judged her improperly at the time of the review. You can repeat this all day long and its not going to change my mind in the absence of some corroborating evidence from that time period that I got it wrong. Back then, other guys were giving her 10's, but I assume they are guys who like full-figured women. I get PM's a lot form guys looking for Kgirls with big Latina butts. They are rare for me to see in person, but Heri is one I would recommend to those guys. Heri was smaller than J-Lo at the time, and there are a lot of guys here that wouldn't throw J-Lo out of their bed, and would give her a 10 for looks. I would give her a 9. What else can I say?
That says a LOT.
Jennifer Lopez is a very well preserved and very fit woman for 51, but she is still 51 anos de edad, and no way could I give ANY 51 year old mujer a 9 for appearance. I can't even think of any Asian women over 50 that would get a 9 from me in appearance
comparing her to Heri from 5 years ago, body only. Sorry is that wasn't clear. With that said, I know several Kgirls that
ARE over 50 and still get 9's and 10's from their customers. You yourself has often remarked that Asian women can pass for 10-20 years younger. You won't see them as a matter of principal, but that doesn't mean they aren't hot. For many of us, the numerical age is meaningless, its how they look and how they perform.
Cdl, its hilarious how every time you get caught contradicting yourself, you try to make up excuses. While always bragging how you only fuck slender girls, have high standards and have 95% success rate.
I catch you talking about subpar performance and you'd rather die than mention the girls name in here. We notice you rating a fat girl a 9 in looks and you make up a million excuses, including "hundreds of people can't be wrong" garbage.
This is your post from general boars, talking about big asses. After a post with a black girl big booty you stated that you lost your appetite and then posted this:
Is this not you?
"to my personal tastes. The average girl I see is 5-5 and 110#, plus or minus 10%, so I think you can see how this would put me off my pastrami sandwich. Everyone has their own preferences. No offense meant to those who prefer a ham sandwich."
In your own words, you don't like big asses, in your own words, a girl you gave a 9 for looks does not fit into your own preferences. 140 is well outside 10% off 110.
I don't know what is the reason here, whether you're too pussy to (God forbid) rate a girl the way she deserves to be rated, too pussy to offend the orgs, or just don't like to give nonpositive grades, but what you're saying clearly does not match your actions. This is why I fairly confidently can say Im likely to never see a below average review from you about an active girl. And it will not be because of your supposed high standards or success rate.
You claimed you have this 100% bulletproof scheme where anyone can understand that your 9 is above average. And then we see this girl who gets rated by you with a 9 that goes against your own preferences.
Did you get peer pressured to write that review?
I saw Heri about 6 or 7 times in past 5 years. The most recent one last month made me stop seeing her again. She gained at least 10 lbs from 9 months ago. At least 15-20 lbs from 5 years ago. She was smoking hot then.