Since a large amount of the discussions on this board are around LA based experiences and gals, I thought maybe a Vegas based thread could gain some traction. We've seen 4-5 agencies pop up in the last few years, while HS was the main attraction. But are times a changing a little? Who knows?
Might be a good place for all Vegas K-girl general chatter. Could help visitors too.Lack of enough business and high pressure to work in LA caused migration of K girls to Vegas last 2-3 years. Unless, LA houses can figure out how to generate more business by implementing more efficient screenings, import more desirable girls from Korea, and use better marketing; more houses in places like Vegas and others will pop up.
The migration out of LA is not because business is slow. It's a lot of jerks being disrespectful and pressuring every girl they see for BBFS. The ones that have it on their menu will offer it by the second appointment. You don't have to ask. These guys need to get a clue and Lay off the girls that are trying to give good service in a safe and sensible manner.
Popular girls who can maintain 8.5+ ratings will stay busy enough however many girls are moving to dfferent markets for lack of business. Of course, jerk customers do play a factor for some girls but jerks are everywhere also.
LA houses in general are not putting much efforts as SF and LV. SF houses open more days/hours and offer more competitive rates than LA. They advertise multiple ads, keep track of "available" status better, and have multiple locations from Pennisula, SJ, East Bay, and Oakland. LV houses have their own sites with updated girl availability, open late hours, and offer outcalls. Many LA owners think they can simply sign an apartment lease, put an ad on CV, and expect a shit load of guys who can pass screenings to keep paying $250-300 per trick.
you won't have to ask if I'm serious or not.
I understand the safety aspect but I wish it were a lil easier and quicker to get screened.
Might be a good place for all Vegas K-girl general chatter. Could help visitors too.
The stringent screening. It keeps the customers, the locations and the girls safe. It's frustrating getting in, but once you're in, its comforting to know the booker is doing their job to keep everyone safe. Most LE problems in the past occurred when the market slowed down and a booker would relax their screening requirements. Frankly, I have passed in a few agencies where the screening was lax. It's not worth the risk.
Sometimes I just get lucky on what comes out of my mouth.
As a bonus to what you mentioned, the tough screening creates an exclusivity that could also make it easier to make appointments.
The time and effort to get screened is worth the benefit to visit the top tier.
a few girls that you have to book three to five days in advance to get the time you want. Imagine what it would be if you tripled the number of hobbyists? Eventually more girls would come and soak up the excess hobbyists, but there would be a crunch for a few months that would make hobbying impossible for some of us with limited flexibility in their work schedules.
But as the volumes increases so would the visibility and potential attention. If this were a more tolerant legal setting for this activity that might not matter but the politicians will make point to do something (and then inflate things to some huge trafficking problem) which would not be welcomed by any involved. Things don't need to get as blatant as it was in the NW a while back for people to start noticing and complaining.
I've had zero issue with screening in Las Vegas. But maybe because I have local pf# and I use ter handle in original text requests?
Las Vegas (correct me if I'm wrong) does cost more than LA as I understand it. But I haven't been to any LA (I call all of S0-Cal LA for this topic) agencies.
Try to see two girls each time I go. HS was my go-to agency, but in the last year I have tried three more, and the talent they are bringing in is comparable to the HS standards we are used to.
My first experience in the K-girl world was with an old agency called Asian24/7. They got busted, but I was hooked on the ease of service and of course I've always steered towards Asian women.
Now before I decide, I look at DW, HS, SS-Asian, Thegym. And of course look at the independents. I'm not stuck on Korean. I actually prefer Thai and Filipino, but Korean and Viet women are awesome too.
"Vegasian Club." The girl I saw (reviewed also) was a veteran for sure with excellent service, but don't recall ever seeing her photos in LA, so no telling where these girls are coming from.
The three I've used before are HS, DW, and SS-Asian.
Got to add LVQC, Little Tok, and yes the new Vegasian Club to the list of the ones you guys have mentioned. Missed the special the new agency had, but still had a good time. It's getting too hard to keep up with all the new arrivals lately, just not enough time or funds to keep up with all the action.
Every agency has a ton of hotties right now. But CES is in town. This makes me think gals might be a little less enthusiastic this weekend. I've got at least 8-9 in my radar right now between HS, DW, Vegasian, Gym, SS.
Wish I had 3k to burn, I'd have em all!
But maybe waiting till Monday is a better idea? Or even Sunday night?
several guys have been baited and switched there off of phony photos. They book a girl in the photo and they are contacted by the booker on short notice to tell them there's a mix-up and the girl they wanted is booked up until 2:00a. Then a replacement (not as hot, of course) is offered. The smart guys just cancel and go elsewhere.
LVQC doesn't seem to consistently have girls in the same league as the others, looks-wise, at least from what I see in the photos when I'm there. Just my opinion. Looks are subjective.
It wasn't the girl in the photos, and I really didn't like the apt and area.
I have only used LT two times & with no problems at all. They do have a listing for a new girl, Lucy who is the real deal. Hopefully it is her as she is very well reviewed & has used other bookers here in Vegas.
Emmy very well reviewed who used LT for her booker last time she was in Vegas.
C.elle also very well reviewed who uses LVQC as her booker.
LVQC doesn't seem to consistently have girls in the same league as the others, looks-wise, at least from what I see in the photos when I'm there. Just my opinion. Looks are subjective.
I have been to LVQC and didn't know it. I picked C.elle off of theasianescort.com and the ad didn't mention an agency. The booker set me right up without any screening, so I assumed I was with one of the bookers that I have frequented multiple times before.
Was Screened with P-411 and my white list on TER was very easy and a Great experience. (See my Review of Blue)
Yes, there has been an increase of agencies & independents in Vegas. They all are pretty reliable & consistent in pricing & services, but still hoping for the Bay Area rates.
More girls in Vegas due to lower housing costs & the easy travel from the SoCal area. Also good for the touring girls as a stop-over for a few weeks before traveling to other locations, just hope that the girls who tour would not wait so long to return.
Well good luck for 2017 & a big welcome for all the girls who visit Las Vegas !
I'm actually having a hard time deciding who I want to see today or this week
I've had better luck regarding talent and scheduling with HS and SS..
Unfortunately, while the selection is great this week, I wonder if it's a good idea for us locals/regs to visit before Sunday eve at the earliest. My thinking is the girls will be either tired, booked, or just less enthusiastic after possibly a long week.