I have seen this happen for a minute now and have to ask - what gives?

No it's not really fair but there is always a lot of devil in the details an you don't have details here. But did you start with the post or did you first submit a problem report about the profile and then have TER ignore it or tell you, effectively, to go ef off? I get the post if you tried to work with TER -- either in "fixing" the profile (remove new one or merge the new into the old) or at least get some some statement that they have some reason (which they may or may not be willing/able to share). But if you didn't even reach out to TER with a problem report this is more of a knee-jerk reaction to something you don't have full information about.

No I haven't. A problem report on what exactly? On many profiles delisted?  
Can I multi select all the profiles or do I need to do them one by one?  

And was told they have to do it themselves. I had even created a new profile and reviewed her. She got her reviews reinstated pretty quickly, and my new review was added.

Or when they change their name to dodge crappy reviews.  I usually make sure the new profile references the old one

So now the customers - as usual - get the short end of the stick.

is not small, it's six digits just like most of the others.  Lol

When they rebrand, it's a well known problem. Unfortunately it's much harder to police as if she has a new profile with new pics good luck trying to prove ter she's the same girl.

I always thought math was not your forte. Thanks for confirming it yet again.  

"It's not on me to fix this issue or even be an initiator of anything. I don't run the site. I am simply pointing out a situation that just shouldn't happen. Period. "

That seems to be new. I've certainly reported cases of multiple profiles existing and ha TER merge the new one with the original, older one. This sees to be a bit different in that the old profile was removed but presenting that to TER should be enough to get them to take action or at least offer some justification (even if it's STFU it's our site) to the report.

Right. I brought up this problem but I'm now part of the problem for mentioning the problem publicly.  

The question is how are these profiles getting delisted, and why?

six months old are usually worthless.  Everything changes with time; their looks, their shape, their profile, their menu, their personality, their attitude, their understanding of English, and quite often, they enter one of the stages of burnout near the end.  Unless you have a time machine, looking at reviews more than six months old are not going to be indicative of the looks or service you are going to get today when it comes to Kgirls.  Low-volume indies are a different story.  If you look at old reviews and think that's what you want, then no wonder you have up to 50% disappointing sessions as you once said on this board.  

So no, reviews don't have expiration dates.  

http://web.archive.org/web/20250216001611/https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/yuna-4087859100-401959

that it is against TER rules is duly noted.  You like to call out bullshit, but so do I.  When you get a little more experience on TER, you might stop speculating about what is and what isn't allowed.   If you don't the like the way this site is run, start our own.  There are probably several newbie Kgirl lovers who would join.  Lol

I said I haven't seen a profile of an indie seller who has delisted but then came back with fresh reviews and a new profile.  

Referring to who I’m talking about, no she didn’t ask to be delisted. She returned from Korea for a visit tour and found out when she landed here.

because Rocket has provided enough information to where any one of us can now submit problem reports for Yuna and La Sera. Unless of course you and or Jensen has enough energy to criticize Rocket but not enough to part of the solution. I will freely admit I don't have the energy to submit the problem report. Maybe Big Papa is watching and will try to pick up some more VIP days.

it on the Suggestion and Policy Board.  (That's the graveyard for stupid ideas.)

due to her association with an agency that violated TER rules.  The most common is when an agency offers reviews a discount for a good review.  The entire agency, including all of the girls who received reviews while working there, can be banned.  Nothing of value can be exchanged for a good review.  Mongers are also not allowed to solicit discounts or payment in money from providers for a good review on TER.  

I know the new profile was on TER very recently, with about 15 reviews as you stated, but it seems to be gone now. Maybe TER has acted as a result of this thread and took down the "new" Yuna and Sera profiles. Maybe somebody reading this thread submitted problem reports rather than ragging on you. The CDL explanation was hilarious if you tried to apply it to Sera since she added BBFS to her menu a couple of years ago. All adds that listed her menus and/or pricing have shown she added BBFS as did her new profile and reviews.

I am wondering if the two you mentioned had connection with the K-Org that got busted in MN.... or visited MN.

Yep. But the catch is - she already left. So we can't conclude who was the initiating party.

That my explanation would be hilarious if applied to Sera.  I did not name Sera as one of the girls that were delisting for the reason I stated.  In fact, I didn't mention any girls by name because I knew Rocket would go crazy from it.   I merely said there are many girls delisting to escape the BBFS tag.  There are always outliers and obviously, Sera would be one of those because she has been advertising BBFS on the websites where she is represented for booking.  As they disappear one-by-one, you will all know who they are.  As the NAME reappears, you can guess whether it's the same girl or a new girl making the enterprising move of taking over the abandoned name of a retired Kgirl.  

Is because you never name names

No you are part of the problem if you just want to make some post but not actually do what TER has generally asked and expected from its user community by reporting the issue via known reporting paths.

I guess when you are the one who TOFTT make sure you outline her service sucked in the old profile and still does in the new one?

Just because you claim your drivel is fact doesn't make it so

I'm pretty sure neither LA sera nor Yuna were at these orgs.

I know a few k-girls who have left the industry have had their profiles removed here.  However, it seems many who are still active have their profiles removed for some reason or another.  

The only reason they call me part of the problem is because they don't really want to acknowledge the problem... because it would validate my point, and also they want to shift burden.

I see it as a bit more nuanced than that. Yes, I did actually say I thought Rocket might be part of the problem if he did nothing but post here rather than presenting his case to the admins that run the site. As for any of the rest of us reporting, that is possible but since all the information derives from rocket my reporting it  is nothing more than hear-say and so not nearly as solid as if rocket makes the report. Part of what made TER good was that it was a member driven site where people both added and fixed what was not right. It's become less about that and more about in-fighting (common on the boards but used to not spill into the reviews too much) about pretty much everything.

There's no problem report button in general. You have to tie it to a specific profile.

You said there was a new profile so the Report a Problem will be in that profile, under the send PM button. How is that difficult to understand or have you just never bothered to look?

I thought you actually read my posts...  

So your gripe was that someone has made a new profile for some girl that delisted but kept working with all the same ads and pics and agencies and someone submitted a review and recreated a new profile that was actually removed before you posted???

Have you actually read the fucking thread???

with Sera's new profile but didn't. As for the other profile seems like something that got addressed so just you being nitpicky about things.

You haven't answered me.

All I've said is that when you FIRST posted that was when you should have been reporting things to TER -- or at least as long as the new profile with no history that you can prove exists was up. After that and either the old info is back or the new, only new reviews profile is removed there is no problem to report and no one will be seeing anything that might be misleading.  

This is you being dishonest again.

I'll let others decide for themselves just who is being dishonest here. Which of these responses seems to support you're claim I am ignoring what you claim? Feel free to look through the other responses that were more about you side tracking into so irrelevant argument so you can take issue with things if you want to show how these refute any of the below.

Saying this means you don't understand the problem, again.

You are failing to consider the facts that make what you suggest impossible.  First, it's very common these days for NEW Kgirls to take on the name of some past legend.  A few brazen new girls have even hijacked past photos of her, and unless you have seen the past girl, you are not going to know the new girl may be the same girl with a fresh slate.   TER will not usually combine names into one profile unless the prior ad link and the new ad link go to the same photos and are both active at the same time.  The mere fact that both profiles are the same is not convincing, because with limited drop-down choices there may be hundreds or even thousands of profiles of different Kgirls with the same physical characteristics, and we all know that the Kgirl service menu is pretty much standardized.    

It's very simple. It's in accordance to TER rules.

If the photos are the same, but the original provider was using them three years ago, and the new girl is using them NOW, then there is no way to be CERTAIN that they are the same girl.  That's why the test is whether they are the same photos on the CURRENT AD LINKS for both girls.  If that's the case, they will usually be combined into one TER ID number. Otherwise, what you are proposing does not provide the degree of certainty that TER usually required in order to combine multiple profiles.

Maybe you have reading comprehension problems

along with this thread.
There were a few Kgirls that had their profiles removed.
iirc, they got caught up in a review for session time or discounted time.
One of the girls I saw and reviewed, had a new profile started maybe a month or so ago.
So, I saw, she is in my rotation and reviewed her again just last week.
Checking her profile today, I see it has been removed again.
She's still in town and working, wonder what's up with her being removed!