I am about to finally embark on this hobby next week. I'm contacting girls right now.
The first girl I want to visit is a k-girl. She only has 2 reviews.

These kgirls are all handled by the same few bookers, right? and many of these kgirls don't speak passable english?
So when I visit non-kgirls, how do I get references if the next provider is going to call up?

Who does the next provider even speak to? the bookers?

reference checking is under the sole purview of the booker.  The girls themselves are oblivious and have no say in the matter unless they know you and can vouch for you with the booker.

-- Modified on 5/4/2016 8:47:37 PM

While the K-world is a bit different most of the basics are the same so you'll probably find a wealth of information there if you've not looked. If you have you might want to go back and review again.

Just to answer the one question

Kgirls and their bookers/PO's are not good references for Non-kgirls
Just like Non-Kgirls are not good references for K-girls
Unless you find a k-girl that is on P411 which is very rare

The language barrier is to much of a problem for both sides.

more the korean agencies don't want to work outside the korean network for security reasons.  closed society enables tighter security against LE

My first time I had no choice, having no kgirl references, I used the name of one of Russian/East European girls I had recently seen (also a booking service) and it passed muster.  Of course I don't know that the reference was actually checked but if your reference is legit it should be OK.

END OF MESSAGE

The indictment from the recent Federal bust of 11 upper level people (owners, etc.) in NYC on money laundering and related charges was posted on-line. It was based on 4 years of investigations and "confidential source 1" and "confidential informant 1" who were both lower level K workers. One of them had been nabbed for something minor and then squeezed to cooperate.  

None of the working girls was arrested and none of the Federal charges were related to provider - client activities.  

"K-only" was not security enough but the cracks in the wall were not due to customers or bad screening, either

Read the nyc bust...sounds like lower tier operation.  Brick and morter shops wide open massage parlors etc just looking to be busted with alot of people involved which led to less tight control.  LA scene is mostly incalls with few people involved..almost impossibel for the network not notice if someone is being squeezed by LE

I don't know the LA scene but from the linked article (NY Daily News), 11 of the 12 named places were unobtrusive commercial lofts, upper floor business settings or non-obvious converted apartments. I had been to many of them  Only one was a storefront shouting out "Asian Spa!"

http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/nyc-crime/11-brothel-operators-nyc-facing-money-laundering-charges-article-1.2599775

Now that doesn't mean that the NYC AMPs are the same as the LA AMPs.  

The NYC 2016 multi-bust seemed to stem from an "original" bust at one place that they decided to investigate further. It seems that the mamasan at that place got squeezed and cooperated. Due to the close knit "K network" in NYC, the other 11 places were tied up into one package. It wasn't so much outsiders that exposed them but the paper trail of money, ads, emails, leases, -- all of it internal K people -- etc. that did them in.

I repeat, NYC ain't LA but it wasn't a screening problem that brought them down.


-- Modified on 5/5/2016 4:15:13 PM