Let’s put descriptions like this in page one of what not to list in reviews.

Reviewer listed a specific building that was the location of a joint DOJ/local bust that sent some agency personnel to federal prison and publicly exposed a group of mongers when the local DA decided to press charges against them. The reviewer in question thought he was helping mongers when the reality is he’s helping law enforcement with location descriptions like this.

Back in the day the now defunct org in the bay area, one I was fond of because of talent, KGA, had a guy - likely a newbie - literally list the address (I mean full building address of the townhouse) on both of his reviews of two girls there.

I had to get Jensen and another fella (who doesn't post on here anymore and we can't talk about him) to help me make complaints to ter and the address was eventually removed in a day or two.  

 
The guy did not appear malicious, he just seemed very new and seemed to think the address field required a full address. KGA also had extremely light screening so it attracted lots of boobs.

Nats or MM^^?

Lol! This was supposed to be noobs, but I guess those letters are right next to each other and autocorrect obviously thought boobs was the right call!

Hope you're good, badger.

were saying they were dumb/inexperienced and went with a joke.
I am good, thanks!

I thought this just became a reddit response...HA.

did sag take it down or ... ?

-- Modified on 6/23/2026 10:21:54 PM