Visited with one of my regular this week and talked about all the current competition in the LA area (not OC).  She said LA hobbyists are so picky that there has to be large selection of Kgirls to choose.  I do consider myself picky.  My criteria are (1) must be around the LA area for at least a year and I can check by looking at the number of reviews; (2) must be able to communicate in English.  I would ask the booker or check the reviews for communication skills.

I'd imagine level of pickiness is largely derived from the following:

No fatties, no uglies.  I used to have an age limit as well, but as some of favorite Kgirls get older, my age limit has become more fluid.  Lol    My preference in body type used to run to spinners, but after having seen dozens of taller girls, taller and slender has become my preferred look, but that won't stop me from seeing a girl who is a LITTLE thicker, because for me, service is king, and if I hear of a girl who has outstanding service, but can't lay off the ice cream or bon bons, I would still see her.

So true...I do also consider the quality of service but if this kgirl just around for a week then I will pass.  I know...its my lost.
.

My criteria is similar in some respects. Different in others.

what rocket says all the time?  Sounds like you’re coming over to his POV.

If she's available for the time I request!

I can't believe that with your extensive DB of CDL posts you didn't stumble across at least 10 where he advocates seeing the -- my words here -- MILFs as they will be more experienced and provide much better service than the young 20 year olds. Think he typically was saying late 30s and early 40s were a sweet spot for his preferences. All that has been said many times before rocket ever showed up here.

Ditto!

I wouldn't consider BP's comment to be antagonistic, much less "fake news" (disgusting) or "spin" as I, and I'm sure others, were also under the impression that BDP prioritized looks over service among MILFs.

to a post where I said this, which was way before Rocket showed up.  There's another one in 2016 I could link that was in response to a post of yours.   The point is that my position has not changed.  I have posted this on several boards.   I have always valued service over appearance . . . . up to a point, of course.  There is always a line in the sand for me for fat or ugly, but these are often fluid concepts when talking to other Kgirl mongers.  I have seen girls that I considered fat, but the guys who recommended them did not consider them fat.  But in these cases, I never repeat no matter how good the service was.

-- Modified on 2/4/2022 2:12:22 PM

a post from 2016 RESPONDING to BP where I said this very thing during an age thread?  He knows better because he has been in on a lot of the prior discussions on this board.  He also knows he can suck in the newbie low information guys like you.  Jensen has been here a long, long time, so he knows the real story.    Name ONE other monger here besides you, who were sucked in by the BP fake claim, that thinks I have ever prioritized looks over service?  You like to say you are "sure" of something when all you do is speculate.  BP cannot do this without suckers, so let him know how many of you there are here so he will be encouraged to keep making things up.  How SURE are you now?        If you say "gullible" really slow, it sounds like Oranges.  Lol

ad's say something like "short visit", but if she was recommended to me (by a fellow monger), but not my preferred body type, I will still see her, but only once.  Generally, I don't like to see new girls who will not be around long enough to repeat with if we connect well.

Seriously.  

Just wanted to say you have bragged before about not fucking fat girls, not mentioning anything about their service. And I think when I posted my "limits" in pounds you ridiculed me for it. So clearly, when it comes to a fat girl who is excellent service, you will choose the looks over service in that case, no?  

I’d like to expand this discussion just a little bit.

of what fat is.  Here's a link to your definition of fat . . . .

about menu expansion.  Many Kgirls who are new will have more limitations on their menu.  Things like DT, FIV, Rimming, Shower BBBJ, and CIM may not be initially offered when the girl first starts, but she adds them down the road to be more competitive with the other girls who offer them, and this is why RECENT reviews are important to read because they may have added more things to their menu since the profile was created when they first started.  You call it "trending" and "potential", and I think that's a good way to look at it.  If the list of things they DON'T do is as long as the things they do, most will make some adjustments in their menu, and the place to look for indications of that is in the more recent reviews.

I never said 150 pounds is ideal. Wow. Look at the post in the link yourself. I said my upper limit on weight is 150. And I said the height of 5'2-5'4 is ideal for me. Two separate sentences. I never said 150 is ideal. I weigh 185 myself.  

No one in this topic but me actually mentioned skills. But you claim you don't read my posts. Interesting.

Absolutely true.  

You said 150 pounds is the "limit" for you, and 5-2 to 5-4 is Ideal.  You are still willing to see a girl who is 150 pounds and 5-4, so how does that change anything else I said.  I'm not willing to see a girl who is 150 pounds unless she is over six feet tall.

If it's the best service I could ask for, of course I'd see the 300 pound girl. We'd have to forego cowgirl and other positions that can crush me, but I'd like to experience best service in the world. Because to me,  
service is truly king.

Please provide your source for this authoritative claim on what "service is king" must mean for everyone. Or are you just claiming your definition is everyone else's.

Now you are saying if you see a 175 pound girl, its only because the other choice is a "dead fish girl."  Do you really think those are the only two choices you would have on that occasion?  Now you're veering off into the ridiculous.  It just sounds like you will keep moving the goalposts by changing the qualifications to try to make the point you haven't been able to make yet.  Nobody here is buying it, and you are just making yourself look bad without much help from me.   I'm just handing you the rope.  

He’s an idiot. Why keep debating someone who has no ethics or integrity and keeps making it up as he goes? CDL, you’re better than this.

I think the difference is that he is always thinking about what gives him the most attention and the feeling of having the power to make others react. Everything else he does is subordinate and even subservient to that imperative. And will always be that way until he gets the help he needs far more than the narcissistic fix he gets from his weak attempts to manipulate threads on a monger board.

Um, I never said we have anything in common. Yes, I will see a 300 pound girl with amazing service because for me, service is truly uber alles. I answered your question. I never moved any goalposts.  

I already said that my definition seems to be different from his definition. I never said my definition is authoritative.  

I hope you understand you're insulting service queens by calling them "script queens" because most of the service queens I've seen are open to any script. I personally don't like any scripts.  

our respective definitions of good service.  I consider that good service is when the GFE is convincing and good, so this includes her skills AND her social game, because creating the GFE is part of the service, not looks.  You have made it clear on numerous occasions that the best service for you are girls who "can take a pounding."  That doesn't require any social skills at all, only the ability to tolerate a session with you. That would explain why an obese woman is someone that you could even consider if her service is good.  I bet the sound of your flesh slapping together would be a real turn-on for you, because it would validate you are really pounding her well.  Such a stud!!!  But yes, if you would pay for sex from a 300-pound woman, your standards are very low indeed, but that also means you would fuck her for free if she let you pound her, right?  There are a lot of lonely fatties out there that you wouldn't have to pay.  Once they get to know you, they might  even develop a crush.  

CDL, fwiw (not much, I know) this reply to the self avowed voice for all monger newbies is spot on!

-- Modified on 2/7/2022 2:54:46 PM

I'm glad you see the disconnect.

that's your stock in trade.  You have at least 10 prior posts on this board where you either complain about girls who "can't take a pounding" or praise girls who can.  You even admitted, "I won't lie, I love girls who can take a pounding."  Apparently, it doesn't matter if they are a pig, hippo or rhino, as long as they can take a pounding.  

"If you won't even consider girls no matter the service only due to their weight, how exactly can you make a claim of "service is king" with a straight face? Lol. Do you know what service is king means? It means you put service above anything else! An automatic pass because of weight does not mean service is king. Lol. "

Well, I thought it was ironic that someone who claims service is king, makes fun of people who pay money to have sex with fat girls or grannies provided service is king...it's like service is king, but with a corollary or a small font text.  

I'm starting to get a life size picture of the Felcher Boy. Mid 30s, Asian, JuCo drop out, probably 5'7", lots of hair product and fake gold chains, narcissist, unemployed/unemployable, drives around in a 4 cylinder Acura with the loud muffler, and complains about KGirls because either (1) he's banned from agencies, or (2) his parents won't give him money for a date. Oh, and every time the grown ups catch him bs'ing or lying he proclaims his integrity and tries to lie or bs his way out of being caught. What a guy.

Rocket singing about his ATF.  Turn on your sound and listen to the lyrics.  It's Rocket all right!!!   Lol

I've never said that "best service for me are girls who "can take a pounding". I mentioned what I like multiple times. You choose to ignore it.  

Look at this guy with personal atks and talking sht about me. When all I've said is that it's ironic cdl makes fun of people who prefer service over looks, while himself proclaiming service is king - one would think he'd be sympathetic to other people who prefer service over looks... and prefer it all the way. But nah. He instead calls a subset of women "pigs" and "subspecies" and ridicules people for liking service over looks.  

"I never said, . . .", you should read your own posts on the subject.   When you start off with bullshit, nobody will read whatever else you have to say.  

No, I would not. Why would I be interested in a post from 6 years ago? It seems like you're unaware of this due to your age, but not everyone can dedicate their retirement years to archiving posts on here. You speak of certainty, and yet your conviction when spouting bullshit stems from your "experiences" rather than anything based in fact.

I never said that best service for me is girls who could take a pounding. Do I like girls who can take a pounding - yes. But that doesn't constitute the entirety or even the most important part.

I hate to be the one to tell you, but the fact that you graduated high school doesn't mean you have a graduate degree.
.
Explain for us, what's with all the code words? sh@dy, priv@cy, sh@me, r0b, r0bjob, del_ete, hara$s, cr_me, ri$k, emerg_ency, and many more. Must be a kids thing?

Sure thing, I can explain those words. You know how sometimes you got posts go into moderation and you need to wait for them to show up, often half a day? Well, many of those words are stop words that make the post go into moderation automatically. Once I get message "approved shortly", I go and change the post to have these words changed and 90% of the time the post becomes active immediately upon changing.

get the post moderated.  I am writing this at 1:19 am.  Moderation is random on TER unless all your posts are moderated.

Nope, it's not random.

There may well be some random moderation but if you put the words, correctly spelled, in a post it will go to moderation. I did not then try editing and posting again to see if rocket's statement was true but don't see a good reason to think he's just making shit up.

Thanks Jensen.

when I edit a post on the K-girl board, it gets posted immediately.  On all other TER boards, edited posts almost always go into moderation.  I think it's because TER really likes me to keep this board fair and balanced!!

have a sense of humor after all.  Kudos.  Lol

Put it in body, not subject. It also would help to have some semblance of sentences and structure.

I think it's a damn shame that some hobbyists harass providers for whatever reason.  It should be a crime...it could be called "stalking."

Ya think? Really? Of course it’s him! And this thread confirms useyrhead’s theory that Felcher Boy is a narcissist of the highest order. He thinks that he’s so important that he tries to gimmick the system to get his posts live faster than they should be. Admin, are you watching this? Help please.