On a 9 rating, model material, just what kind of model is being thought of?
When you think of a model does a VS or SI type of woman come to mind?
Tall & slender or can it be any type of woman as long as she's really good looking?
At least to you.
You can even be PC and include a Lane Bryant full figured woman, they are legitimate models too!
There are all types of guys that like all types of women.
And as always, it's all subjective!  
I had a session last week and was with a petite really cute Kgirl, who IMO, was close or a couple of years  
away from being DDG! I felt she could grow into her beauty!  
Do you feel or think that at the second or third session as the chemistry grows your Kgirl gets better looking?
That has happened to me, sometimes halfway through the first session!
I know the lightning bolt factor can come into play, but even they can get better looking, IMO!

 

Let me know what you guys think about model material or if a Kgirls looks can or have gotten better as the chemistry grows or the sex gets more involved.

In terms of face moreso than body.

 
Face wise we can have tons of debates. Some guys love classic Korean look, some like myself love that southeast Asian look, etc etc.

 
When it comes to being a "model", I feel like there's far less variance here. Generally toned, often voluptuous. I think low body fat is generally preferred  in the world of Asians. But again, subjective. I do know short and chubby/fat generally is excluded from models... as is big boned/fat. Loose skin isn't very model-y.

 
As far as kgirls go, service and chemistry is almost all that matters to me personally, but sometimes there are girls who are hard to look at and they'd need a top tier service/attitude level to compensate.

I don't think looks get better for me even if w have tons of chemistry but I think what happens is that small things/nitpicks/imperfections can get ignored more as we develop chemistry and great sessions. For example, I never cared about busted teeth. Some folks might. It might be noticeable but after a gear session it's not relevant to me. Some mommy damage or loose skin can get annoying to eyes, but if the girl is great, you look past it.

 

I don't know. Then again I could never understand people who go for eye candy over service and chemistry. Like maybe if you're taking her out and showcasing to others maybe I get it, but like fucking a dead fish whom you have no chemistry with, is really drab. Maybe I'll get it 20-30 years later when I'm older lol. But for now, I think... being fun and having solid skills is all that matters to me.

 
Sorry badger, ended up a longer post than I wanted. Brevity hardly my forte haha.

From what I've read and picked up on, it seems younger guys go for looks more than older guys.
But everybody has their own perspective. I personally like service and chemistry. When it comes to looks most of the Kgirls I've seen are a 7 and up.
Always subjective and just how I saw them, but I do my research and have a pretty good idea who's opening the door.

While everyone has their own view -- regardless of how well they might be able to articulate the view -- I tend to think more in terms of what I might expect in terms of the ranges guys might have. I have no doubts that with hundreds of guys seeing a girl and some writing a review that one could easily see ranges like 6 to 8 or 7 to 9 and even the occasional 6 - 9 range.  I think seeing the tighter range of just a difference of 1 is also to be expected at times as well.  

 
I think the other aspect here is that some people have very specific, narrow criteria so they will have some that meet their standard but many others that don't. Then I think there are others that find different looks equally attractive so will tend to find more women they find attractive. Those will also be reflected in review scoring.

 
I'd also note that I don't think the above only applies to looks but also to performance.  

 
I've definitely found that familiarity with people changes how I see them. I've know women I thought were so very hot but as I got to know them better they lost their attractiveness to me due to their personalities and type of person they were. I've also known women I initially didn't think were all that attractive but after a while wonder why I ever thought that of them. So yes, I think your experience with a person can and does change how you see them.

 
As for the same session change you mention, I find that occurs when they relax and you get to see a more natural expression an body language from them. They can actually laugh or smile at a comment and you'll see it in their eyes as well. That more genuine look is always more attractive to me than any acting -- though I also accept that it could just be the acting improved during the session because they could relax.

-- Modified on 2/23/2023 12:04:11 PM

I can summon up what I find generically attractive. Dark hair attractive face and body. But what really gets me going is that look or that body language a woman can give a guy that stirs my emotions.  

When I find a woman who looks at me like she is attracted to me, I can get equally attracted to her if she has a nice face and figure.  

Men are visual animals. Women are emotional animals.  

They have skills.  

are you gonna see her with that blindfold on^^!

Lol. The blindfold was an experiment. I might do it again but with a Kgirl who doesn’t speak English.  It will either be a disaster or another exceptional experience.  

Assessing a woman’s figure doesn’t need visuals.  We can form an opinion by feel.  

normally i dont go for the classic VS style model. Slim, slender and tall isnt my cup of tea. Looking at top models these days dont get me going at all.  

i'm more of the hot ABG with with fake tits and heavy makeup type of l look, or a thick latina with a video vixen type of body. i do know a lot of guys like a very classic type of korean beauty, not really my thing...maybe because i was always surrounded by it as a kid? they look a bit plain to me.

I had to figure out what VS and SI are. Very Slim? Stupendously Intoxicating? Then it hit me: Victoria Secrets and Sports Illustrated.  
.
VS started featuring BBW models in 2016 (or earlier).  
http://bbwcon.com/podcast/bbw-victoria-secret-red-carpet-2016/
BBW Victoria Secret Red Carpet 2016
.
Sports Illustrated has all sorts of pretty models, including athlete-models.  
.
Didn't VS (or SI or some other big "model" company) have a trans model on their catalog or magazine cover?  
.
Most K-girls I have known (which also means selected from their photos or lineups) I think are beautiful. According to some psychology studies, Asian women are the most attractive women in the world. It partially has to do with symmetry. Slanted eyes direct our focus to the midline which enhances the perception of symmetry. In the studies, they can use computers to manipulate features on one face so it has slightly different features (some of which increase or decrease symmetry) and the college boys taking the surveys to provide the data seem to respond to symmetry.  
.
Photo from linked BBW VS article:

The last VS catalog my daughter received in the mail was only about half full of "slim, slender and tall" models.  The other half were fat girls (PC euphemisms are full-figured or robust) in the 200-pound+ range.  For me, even in VS lingerie, they do not look sexy.  The photos will all posed standing still, but you know if she walks into the bedroom, the rubbing of her thighs together will cause those low-cut panties to disappear up her crack, both front and back, so they will never look like the girl in the photo.   Now, a 200-pound girl that is 7-10 will still look "slim, slender and TALL."   Lol

What about the phrase "lipstick on a pig"  
That fits.

To quote badger further up the thread . . . . . . "lipstick on a pig . . . . . ."

Lipstick on a pig is too kind. More like lipstick on an old, beat up dump truck? Then again, if those two were Korean one of our colleagues would be beating down their door.

END OF MESSAGE

Some secrets should remain secret.

"Victoria's Secret" that no one wants in on.  Lol