Yes, you don't NEED to say it. But I've never seen you say it when it comes to mongers complaining about bad behavior.
But in instances where it's directed at mongers, I've seen you say it many times.
What kind of conclusion should I make? The same exact conclusion I came to four years ago.
I didn't say hpy needs to be validated or supported. But Itd be nice to see you support a fellow monger who's complaining, one you agree with, for once. For ONCE. Instead of you trying for 47363th time to slyly play the role of a useless peacekeeper while being on the sellers side 99% of the time.
And this time too, no agreement explicitly but a disagreement explicitly when hpy dived not the hypotheticals (and btw still no answer to me as to if hpy wanted to see Jay what would be the best hypothetical in his scenario. Deep down you must know the best hypothetical outcome is still not the one he wanted, you aren't stupid. So why not reply? I get it, you don't want to validate my valid point. I get it. )
"Do you think that my or anyone elses failure to say "good job hpy!" is going to make him question what he did and maybe change his approach? I sure don't."
No, but why should I - or anyone else - trust you when you say you agree with hpy yet you never explicity stated so?
Especially since you have no problem explicitly agreeing when roles are reversed? Something doesn't add up, and that's why I'm calling you out for double standards. Same for people who are on a review site who can't bring themselves to write a negative review, but have no fucking problem in the world penning a glowing one. These are double standards that end up hurting mongers.
"Yet I have never once seen you make that point or show any support for it."
What point? Bro I just explained to you in detail that a shitty booker can host an amazing girl.
I never said don't give money to all the bad actors because it's dumb. Kgirls are still best value for tour money.
"should I follow your lead here and think everyone should keep writing posts and reviews that talk about the bad actions of agencies but still keep giving your business to them"
Everyone decides for themselves if they want to continue giving their biz to the offending party. Some people simply don't care and just want a piece of Asian ass. Why should I blame them?
Here's an example: LG and many other smart TV manufacturers have shat on people's privacy and ethics. They monitor shows you watch, things you say on the mic and then sell this info to third party buyers. This is done by default, and the option to opt out is off by defauly and hidden within menus.
I can and do say (look up Louis Rossman, I'm a fan of his content even though he is a repairman so he has a horse in the race) that this is akin to a r8pe tactics. They had no explicit consent to do this. I can say the company is a POs and if you can you should buy a TV from a different company, preferably one that doesn't have mandatory connection to the internet.
I can say all that. Yet there will be people who don't care about their info being sold or ethics or anything like this. All they want is watch TV at a press of a button. As consumers they have a right to do this.
You say I should blame them. But why?
You want another example. Patriot act. I think it's a piece of shit piece of legislature that infringes on people's rights, and was done under guise of fighting teггorism. Are you gonna say don't blame the people who wrote the act, blame the people who voted for the people who wrote the act?
No, I'm going to blame people who come up with unethical behavior way more than I will blame people who despite this unethical behavior will still give them money or support.
They might have different reasons why to keep giving them money. I don't pretend to know them, because everyone has different viewpoints and bs thresholds.
Unlike you, I care about random fellow mongers who aren't outright shills. They get to decide what to do with information I or anyone else presents. And my indignation is my indignation only. I made more enemies than friends, but that was to be expected. I'll live.
Also. I see you still have no comment on sdag and my example. Even though you've asked multiple times for it, and I gave it to you, you chose to ignore the example. I'm gonna ask you again, do you agree that this is an example you wanted? Or it doesn't fit your narrative so you're going to ignore it conveniently?