K-girls

Re: no rebrand
team_rocket_qwerty 111 reads
posted

Would be a lot easier for consumers if there were pics on TER profiles,as most girls use the same pics on their tours. As of now, one of those profiles is deleted, another only has one review and seems only one profile is fully active.  

 

We're pretty used to multiple kgirls with same names in the bay. We've had like three Tias working at the same time, two Haras and so on. Since these two profiles cdl talking about have the respective orgs witten right on them, I'd say it's pretty trivial to figure out which one is which...

There are two different girls in OC going by the name, "Velvet."  If you review either one of them, please make sure you put your review on the right profile page.  I had to report one in the wrong place already.  

 
http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/velvet-7148642886-346350

 
http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/velvet-7148642886-352126

 
340350 is the one that has come to ca-kdolls two or three times in the past year. 352126 is a new girl that hasn't been to OC before that I'm aware of, at least not as velvet, but could be a rebrand.  

-- Modified on 8/29/2020 7:25:45 PM

That is really annoying when Orgs do this... I have experienced this before in the Bay... some orgs do it on purpose to copy popular girls names...

A modest proposal but back in the day a guy with a book named Red came up with a shorthand for identifying ladies and their orgs, which was to refer to the latter by locale and the last 4 of the phone number.  That way, "Coco @ Santa Clara 1234" was clearly a different individual than "Coco @ Foster City 5678".  The proliferation of independent bookers may complicate the situation a bit but usually one number can usually be associated with one or the other.

SLAmpVIP

If you review someone with a Profile, I recommend mentioning the TER Profile ID# in the General section.
I used to mention TER IDs in the General section of my Reviews, such as: "This is a review of Coco ### and not Coco ###, Coco ### or Coco ### who are all different Cocos. Coco ### was also known as Cherry and their Profiles have been merged into Coco / Cherry."  That way, if there is a mistake and, worse, a merger of reviews of different Cocos, you can still separate them out. (Although it would be good if TER had some sort of internal tag in order to UNDO such an erroneous merge.)
.
It's almost ancient history, but the league folks used to have a pretty good website with an archive of photos and names that made it possible to match new names with old faces.  When touring girls came to the east coast but chose a new name, it was often possible to find their Reviews under their west coast names using the concordance.  Such a name - photo archive (maintained offshore, of course) would be REALLY helpful.  I wonder if it could be set up with some help from TER, as a TER spinoff?

Posted By: coeur-de-lion

There are two different girls in OC going by the name, "Velvet."  If you review either one of them, please make sure you put your review on the right profile page.  I had to report one in the wrong place already.    
   
 http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/velvet-7148642886-346350  
   
 http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/velvet-7148642886-352126  
   
 340350 is the one that has come to ca-kdolls two or three times in the past year. 352126 is a new girl that hasn't been to OC before that I'm aware of, at least not as velvet, but could be a rebrand.

Register Now!