wigs or fake hair in any form, of which I think extensions are the most common. I was speaking more metaphorically with regard to the super skinny body type. Think Victoria Beckham for the Caucasian equivalent...

But my biggest complaint is the shaving of the waistline (I've posted this many times).  
The pics show )( or ) ( but she is either | | or even ( ). Sometimes (   ).  
I can be very happy with | | or ( ) but I am disappointed when the pics lead me to expect )(.  

Most of the K-girls I've met are very pretty to me. I am rarely disappointed. The biggest disappointments are when blurred face pics don't provide enough info, but that's only once in a while. (Unblurred is much more common these days.) But the most common disappointment is the barrel-waist that becomes a wasp-waist due to P-shopping.  

I would prefer no P-shopping, except for privacy protection 'cause they are so pretty.

Thanks for pointing that out. And here I've been for the past fifteen years taking the pics and descriptions as gospel. I should have a much better time now...

...simply copies the physical description from the ad.  As a result, most K-girls are described as 5'3"-5'5", 100 pounds with enhanced C cups.  Either the reviewer is too lazy to substitute his own judgment for the description in the ad, or he's scared of being banned by the booker for describing what she really looks like.

I must say that it has gotten a little better in the last couple of years; some guys aren't afraid to add five or ten years to the age listed in the ads.  That's what they should be doing to help their fellow K-bros out.  That's where there loyalties are supposed to lie.

the younger guys (under 30) that seem obsessed with looks.  For most of us older guys, they all look great when comparing them to most civvie women we could date for free.  That's why we pay.  Lol

I have only met a couple out of 400+ that I didn't think had at least SOME attractive physical features, but for me, service is king, and if she's got great skills, and a good personality and attitude to go with it, it makes her that much more attractive in my book.

...rarher a good post. But I do have to say that there have been a couple of times in my hobbying career that there was little or no resemblance whatsoever between the gal's pictures and the gal who answered the door. Most of the times I just sucked it up and told myself that I was still going to get a blow job and get laid, and that in itself would count as a "good" day. Ciao!

Another suggestion I've posted many times on S&P. Instead of "thin, skinny, athletic, baby fat ..." and other subjective terms, I have suggested the review form have standard silhouettes (as used in clothing design, modeling or psychology studies). The reviewer picks the one closest to the girl he met.  

When posted to the Profiles, all of the choices get posted as a histogram or distribution.  

If a series of reviewers select: 3 4 4 4 3 4 4 5 you'll a good idea that she is closest to a 4 (see pic).
I also proposed a "moving average" so you can if she is changing (usually gaining weight):  
3 4 4 4 3 4 4 5 5 5 4 5 5 4 5 5 6 ...  

This way, we are not stuck with  
(a) meaningless terms ("athletic"? Is she a tiny Olympic gymnast or an Eastern European Olympic Weightlifter?)  
(b) the first posted reviewer's opinion only

I am a straight shooter. I would just ask the booker and either they stay quiet, lie, or give me the truth, then I will know what kind of booker I am dealing with. Not every booker lie to me so I know who to trust.

I would also ask for recommendation and I was never disappointed when I did that.

I understand how you feel. I think I know the booker you are talking about. I go based on pics but I pay little attention to description. I have been looking at pictures so much that I can almost tell when they are only representation.

Sometimes I decide to go anyway and just as I suspect, she is not the same, but I still try to get my money worth anyway. I never think a session is crappy just because I don't like her look. Below average may be, but no regret.

In my experience on the east coast, you can tell from the ad pics who to expect in the room. I have never seen a 5'0" become a 5'5" (but I have seen way too many hour glass ) ( figures become | | or (--) in the room).  I prefer thin ) ( , but I'm more of a face guy anyway.  
.
(EDIT: open par ( space close par ) produced open par SMILEY, like this (   in the post. I added some hyphens to make it work better. I hope.)
.
I have arrived at a location with enough confidence in the pic info to know when I am met by someone other than my pre-arranged date. So I politely call them on it: "I'm here to see Tami. You're not Tami." Mama-san or phone girl, who ASSURED me that Tami would be available at that time will sometimes try to push the new girl or someone who needs more business on me.  If "Tami is busy now", I have no problem excusing myself and saying that I will come back later or on another day.  
.
In your case, a polite "Are you Coco?" can be dealt with in many ways. A good answer would be, "No, I'm Pepsi. Coco is busy." "Oh, I was really looking forward to seeing Coco." ...
.
If, "Yes, I am Coco!" you can say, "But you don't look anything like the pics." and see where things go from there.  
.
Sounds like one to chalk up to experience.

-- Modified on 4/20/2017 11:39:42 PM