i got banned because i left after girl was late and tired..so i left
anyways looking for sammy
any other booker handles her?

https://www.misskgirl.com/copy-of-open-5

So the provider was late, and you got tired of waiting and decided to leave the appointment site?

"s" off of https, your link is clickable directly from this board.

the K-girl was both late AND tired so he left.  

Noted. I'll keep that in mind going forward. Thank you.

She has been a first class C*NT recently. I also got banned and my ban story is better than yours.  

Do you mind sharing what happened?

He is not someone who sees K-Girls and only posts on this board to denigrate both K-Girls and those that enjoy seeing them.  

I just did bro! I told you that I showed up and I thought the girl photo was completely different than what was being advertised. So, I told the girl: "Sorry and I left her the donation of $270" for 1/2 hour and I left. My appointment was for 1/2 hour duration, so in my mind I did not think anything except that I got fooled by CGLA AGAIN because that was her third time pulling this BS on me. CGLA booker has done bait and switch before but the other times I fucked the girl and left but this time, the girl was so bad that I had to leave.

Makes no sense to inflate scores so  Orgs or Bookers don't get mad at you. How do they know who you are from your reviews?

The booker at Candygirl says no one has been banned for paying the full session price and then leaving.  

http://www.misskgirl.com/copy-of-open-5

Apparently there are good people on both sides of this story…

My take with Candy Girls is they have two numbers, at least, on the site and couple, maybe three, Bookers and they are off different days.
The service and response time is always good to even better.
The Bookers have been business like to pretty friendly, I guess it depends on whoever is monitoring the phones.

I recall contacting them and altho it didn't work out, they were very polite. LAKangels, on the other hand, were complete cunts. I knew that they were gonna block me anyway so I told the booker to fuck off. That felt sooo good

Sure! If you say so.

I have very good relation with kangeles booker which is very interesting. I guess everyone has the up and down with different booker.

If her statement is true and if I am banned from the girl and/or the boss of the girl, how can I manage to see the same girl from a different booker? CGLA booker is sack of SH*T that is lying out of her teeth.

actually saw her in person, I believe you are still eligible to write a review.  It would be a good way to direct others away from an org that is habitually engaged in B & S.   You can blow off a little steam writing the review.   Just a suggestion.

That provider is gone ! No longer in CGLA's shit list hyped up roster.  

I didn’t say so, the booker did.

Yes ymwv.
Due to my unusual circumstances, my interaction with bookers seems to be extreme - either it's very good and productive, or it's very negative and ugly. I found one LA booker that I love working with who has been very good to me and through him I found a K girl who also helps me find new girls. So it's worked out well. Any bookers that don't want to work with me are quickly forgotten. It's funny because some of the more douchebag bookers have the same girls that I see through other bookers so it's their loss, not mine.

the girl you paid and walked on, that you saw her with a different Booker?
If it's the same one, why would you see her at all?  
I mean you walked and had all this hassle, but still had a session with her.

I said: CGLA Dumb Ass Booker books many girls that are booked by different bookers. I walked out on one that  was horrible but I can see other girls that she books through different bookers. Obviously, I won't go and see a girl that I walked out from!

I thought the sub thread here was about who does the blocking, the provider or the booker. You seemed to be saying it's the booker that takes the action while another says blocking comes from with the provider or the provider's manager.

Well...she is a fucking liar! I have screenshot to prove her lies but I I ain't going to post that here.

That is precisely my point. 90% of the girls are booked by different bookers and an idiot booker like CGLA fails to realize it.

"how can I manage to see the same girl from a different booker?"
To me that sounds like you were talking about the girl you walked on.
The way I read and understood it, it sounded like you saw her through another Booker!
If I got it wrong, no big deal, really.

I have walked away from few and never got banned. I am the one paying so I pick and choose not the other way around. Its more than 18 months that I have not used Candy Girl and am just fine. After walking away from 3 appointments with them, I told them they can go*&*& themselves. I dont know who the booker is since it was all text and no voice call.
All the pictures on those sites are fake anyways so what difference does it make who to see? Its a shot in the dark.
The booker can act like a jerk because mongers allow it. Those guys make huge sums of money every day off of you and the providers. Don't beg them. Just boycott like I did and you will be just fine.  There is no shortage of providers or bookers.

...he has the balls to stand up to bookers.  AND he has the balls to post about it too.

order and sends it out to the customer anyway, knowing some people will accept it, so they may only have to redo their mistakes half the time.  When booker Gray was new in LA, he did B & S on me three times, The first time, the girl was pretty hot, so I went through with it, but the second and third times, I walked.  I don't know if he blacklisted me because I have no intention of booking through him again, so I haven't asked for another session through him since.  In this biz, shit happens, and sometimes a booker has to scramble to make things work.  I get that, but consistently disrespectful behavior should not be tolerated.  In all fairness, there are other mongers who have not had a problem with him and sing his praises, but I have to use bookers that work for me and will respect my time just like I respect theirs.   IMO, you did the right thing.  

all the sites, you mean all the Bookers and their sites?
That's what it sounds like, but you are only mentioning CG.
So, all sites or just CG?
My understanding is the owners/bosses set up the pics and the  
Bookers never see or meet the girls, even after a few years.

Anybody else wanting this dude to make the basic clarifications and finally get an understanding of the question? LMAOOO. Another thread that's wandering aimlessly, far from it's origins.😂

Seems pretty clear what the OP was asking, and why. Not sure if he got an answer but looks like he might have as the link someone posted doesn't look like CG -- but I didn't search the number to see if it was or was not associated with CG.

Yep, just me. From the very start I was thrown off by the first sentence by the OP. I never until now noticed his question, the only question he asked, which was for 'Sammy's' contact info. Oh shit!😂😂😂
 
I still want to know where, if any, the commas go. I'd also like to hear that story, but I think that's asking too much.

I'll defer to Conan the Grammarian regarding the commas.

Only the OP can provide the answer.

the lack of commas in the OP is the least of that post's grammatical problems.

I prefer posters to remove the "s" to make a hot link but even I forget to do so sometimes.
.
Instead, you can highlight the entire link and then "right click" and choose "open link in new tab" (or new window or whatever option you prefer).  But it's still easier when it's a one-click hot link.

That doesn't sound easier to me.   Lol

Are any of your employees or K-girls spiking your coffee with mercury or arsenic? Or is there some other explanation for your loss of reading comprehension?
.
Your "that" refers to my "highlight and right-click and open link in new tab." You are correct that "that" is not easier than one click on a hot link.  
But I already said that. My  "easier" = "But it's still easier when it's a ***one-click hot link***."

Wait you walked out on Gray twice? What were the girls names? Surely you remember them as they had to be outliers in your 98/2 ratio.  

I almost missed this.

Oh, they know...

that he COULD see her through another booker because she is represented by more than one, but if the girl B-L'd him, she would simply not answer the door when she sees who it is and text the booker that she blocked him.  That may change the near future because some of the girls that are now being represented by multiple bookers are considering adding a list to their scheduling pages of the names of the guys who are blocked.  The reason is because if the guy shows up at the door and she refuses to see him from a different booker, she still pays the new booker for making the appointment, because they didn't know the girl had blocked the customer.  By having a list of blocked individuals on their private scheduling site, it would eliminate having to pay a booker for an appointment with a guy they have already blocked with a different booker.  The multi-booker representation is so new, there are still kinks to be worked out, so expect further changes going forward.

Conan's attorney?  Lol

The comma problem recently came up on General.
.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eats,_Shoots_%26_Leaves
"...  A panda walks into a café. He orders a sandwich, eats it, then draws a gun and fires two shots in the air. "Why?" asks the confused waiter, as the panda makes towards the exit. The panda produces a badly punctuated wildlife manual and tosses it over his shoulder. "I'm a panda," he says at the door. "Look it up." The waiter turns to the relevant entry in the manual and, sure enough, finds an explanation. "Panda. Large black-and-white bear-like mammal, native to China. Eats, shoots & leaves." ..."
.
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/ter-general-board-12/queenie-should-put-this-on-her-wishlist-1008790

Alas, can a man dream?

English is apparently not his first language, and I mean that as a compliment to a multilingual. That phrase, he explained, is asking how he can see the *other* girls that booker is advertising without using that booker. It goes to that, what seems unique to LA (SoCal?), feature where a girl comes to town and is represented on multiple independent bookers' sites.  
 
That seems like a strange practice. I mean, we have web malls here, but I can't think of a girl that represented by more than one booker/PO/manager/etc. Maybe we have it and I'm just not in the market for those girls. But I think I'd have noticed by now. lol.

to cities that have Kgirls and have been approved for years with the bookers, they will still tell you the same things they would tell a local customer, so there is no reason SoCal bookers would not do the same thing for regulars from other cities who have a history with a local booker.  I have reviews going back years in various EC cities, and if I'm repeating, I don't write another review.  When I'm traveling, I will often repeat (and repeats for me are always two hours) with girls that do not tour to SoCal very often, so the bookers are getting enough business from me to treat me the same as their local customers.  I'm sure this policy is not unique to me and there are other traveling mongers who know some of our SoCal bookers very well.  

That’s the other side of the story, and you’re an idiot.

"but here you are making the assumption that CKS has "zero ties" to any local bookers in SoCal"

Notwithstanding that saying "I'm not a crook" doesn't actually make you not a crook (ie, the booker saying something here should be taken with a two thousand ton truckload of salt), I would like to get some proof. At least maybe tell us which booker (they have multiple) said this.

Immediately before your quoted bit you made the point about how cks was a east coast guy, and the speculated on his being some booker or other type of relationship with the operations or otherwise is some shill/sycophant.

CYA, and I don't think anyone is buying it.  

I have caught unfamiliar bookers in talkative moods. He didn't say he has an in with her, not that I saw, just that she revealed some not-exactly-house-secrets to him.
 
I made the mistake very recently of quoting a familiar booker as part of bolstering an argument I was making to a site's admin. The booker never said anything to me about it, but she has be short and to the point since then. None of the usual banter. Something else may be going on, but the coincidence is killing me.

There is no assumption here either. Cks is an east coast guy. That's a fact. Just like cgla is a west coast org is a fact.  

Oh my god, cdl. Of course I addressed my post to cks. I'm calling him out, lol. Just like I do to any org shitty behavior defender.

Vigerous, so you're telling me if I were to text several east coast bookers right now who never saw my number before, and ask about specific blacklist situations about specific mongers, I would be able to get any of this info cks claimed to get?

No I am not telling you that.🙄

Well if not, maybe you should define "unfamiliar" and "familiar"

opinion about the booker's behavior, only that the INFORMATION CAME from the booker, so why do you call him out for giving information?  His post was only a few words, and I can't find anything in it that "defends" the booker.  Maybe you should go back and read it again, and then be more specific?

I don't think we disagree on the definition, so I'll take that as... humor? Pfft. LOL.  
 
I said:

"Unfamiliar" to me means someone who I've never contacted before. I'm not even talking about odds, because I just don't think unfamiliar people will ever talk to me about intimate shit, period.

That crazy booker (CGLA) is spinning out of control. I guess the mere fact that she is losing clients left and right has made her totally mentally unstable.

"His post was only a few words, and I can't find anything in it that "defends" the booker.  Maybe you should go back and read it again, and then be more specific?"

Sounds like you guys need to be on the lookout for a rebranding subterfuge by her. Good luck!

"knows" the booker.  I don't see why you have such a problem understanding this.  Do you believe there is something else going on because bookers generally will NOT answer YOUR questions?  If that's your perspective, then your question is understandable, but the fact that so many others here seem to be able to ask questions this of bookers and get a straight answer should be an indication to you that you are an outlier if bookers will not share info with you.  

First of all, you should probably use "who" instead of "that". You did it twice.

you suggest, but they are all potential "assumptions", a concept you keep saying you eschew, but then turn right around and make assumptions of your own, like the assumption that because he does not live in LA, he does not know bookers in LA.  I already said that I know bookers in most cities that have Kgirls because I like to see them when I'm traveling on business.  OTOH, I would probably not admit that I would get on a airplane and go across country JUST to see a Kgirl, and I'm not going to "assume" that CKS is doing anything of the sort, but he might be.  If all you want to do is throw out assumptions and possibilities that are not confirmed, go ahead, because that is what you are doing.  Personally, I could counter your absurdity by suggesting that CKS knows a lot of old people in SoCal that are dying, and when he comes for a funeral, he sees Kgirls.   Lol    I have no facts to back this up, so it would make me no better than you.  

Great points.

"they are all potential "assumptions"

lessons in English definitions after blowing the last one?  Bwahahahahaha

Because I know in my many conversations with people who lie to me, that people wilil try to avoid lying if possible unless it's necessary.  

"Finally, doesn’t engage in bait and switch, and refuses to work with girls and managers who are involved in such practices."