Bruh... Guys, come on. Every single alarm should be sounding. Dude ain't right or above board. This is the most ridiculous and obvious set of questions I've ever seen.
He's just curious but can't ask them because they don't speak English?
Huh? In one of his rapid fire interrogation questions in his OP, he says: * /Who are the PO’s? Where do they find them? | THEY SEEM TO HAVE GOOD ENGLISH? | Who are the owners? Korean?
That's a big contradiction. He says check his reviews, as if they're proof he's not LE or his wife operating his handle. Or his handle hasn't always been LE. Or recently became. It doesn't, but fine.
His recent reviews w/Kgirls talk about laying there and talking. He can explain to a girl that squirt is called "Amrita by the Tantric crowd, “nectar of the Gods.”, using an app to understand complex ideas. So are they good at English, don't speak it, use an app to translate, what?
Since he supposedly returned to hobby, he has mentioned his precise age in every single review. Prior, he never mentioned a specific age. Not once. Oct 2017 he said "I am in my 60's and sometimes I don't get very hard", but never specified his age. Now it's every review.
He also mentions his big dick in all his reviews now but only ONE mention before, in passing, that he dismissed. Almost like the author isn't the same person it used to be. The try to be, but they're not them.
This handle has always unnecessarily forced SW lingo. What 60's to 71 year old says things like this?
- "But I didn’t want to pop yet, so I said “teach me about DATY and DATO.”
- "I was recently initiated into the wonders of Greek by an L.A. mistress of the art (see my recent review)"
His whole premise is he's new to the K-girl game. But his early reviews reflect him dealing with Asian providers through agencies and this post shows he doesn't distinguish between K-girls and Asian. E.g., his 4th and 6th reviews ever. Speaking of those reviews, this is sketch y'all.
- His first review ever was to a provider that never had another review (before or after)
- His second review was to a provider that never had another review (before/after)
- His third review was for a provider done 2.5 years later
- His fourth review was for a Kgirl that never had another review (before/after)
- His fifth review was for a provider in Chicago, he said she verified his boarding pass a week in advance. Couldn't get your BP a week prior in 2012. Provider gone 2.5 years later
- His sixth review was through Los Angeles Asians
- His 7th review he describes a different verification process than other reviews
- His 8th review was a provider done .5 years later
- His 9th review was the first ever for the provider who was done .5 years later
- His 10th review was the first ever for a provider who was done .5 years later (and dramatically different than the other 5 reviews she got - he gave 9 for performance, 3 of the other 4 gave a 2 and said it wasn't the girl in the pics)6
His questions are clearly LEO. Scientists don't inherently ask invasive questions that have zero to do with the task at hand. They use critical reasoning, logic, hypothesize based on information available to them. And who has ever met a scientist that calls themself a scientist? I've met Biologist, Geologist, Chemist, Astronomers, and Botanist. I've read works by Physicist. Not once has anyone ever said "Hi, I'm Joe, Scientist."
But we didn't need me to break all this down. Just go back to the questions with a clear motive and agenda. Who recruits, where and when. Who trains then handles, where and when. How do they bring them to the country. Who's in charge of the location. COME ON.
No one should engage with any person talking like this person is. LEO all the way. On the slim, remote chance I'm wrong, no harm done. What's the upside in risking and engaging in this type of behavior?
*Written by AI and I have no idea what any of your guys are talking about or any of this stuff means. Am I still sleeping?