My take on reviews:

    Stick to the facts: I only care about useful info, specifically the services provided.

    Cut the fluff: I don’t need to know about your physical stats or your "fantasy encounter" play-by-play. Keep the ego and the fan fiction out of it.

    Be accurate: Stop misreporting ages. Claiming someone is "young" when they are in their 40s is pure misinformation and helps no one.

Question for the group: Should we be reviewing our best sessions or our worst?

The first paragraph covers the girl's physicality, appearance and whether her profile listings are correct or not.  The next paragraph covers shower service and oral both ways.  After that, the main event and finally, my overall impression and whether or not I recommend the girl, and what kind of mongers are apt to like her more.  Throughout the narrative, I will comment on how the Kgirl reacts to the things I'm doing so future customers can understand whether she is all business, playful, flirty or a nasty slut.  

 
If you're only interested in the play by play, your review should read like this. . . . .

 
"LFK, DFK, shower, preview, DATY, BBBJ, cover, CG, RCG, ACG, doggy, mish, cleanup, shower, DFK, water bottle."  You don't really need anything else, because the girl's response to all of this is irrelevant.  

I think people should review the sessions they want, good, bad, average whatever. I never cared much about the bad reviews when I paid attention to them as I was always more interested in finding a good session rather than avoiding a mediocre session (outside cases where I would expect a very low quality one -- bedpage ads or some MPs I've been fortunate to generally have good sessions even if they were not as good as I was hoping or expecting).

Tbh, I am more weird out on those reviews focusing on their jr.  How their skill is superior, pounding the crap out of them.  Getting the girls o over and over LOL.  The readerships are male, do you think I care how good your skills or how big your jr is?  Like, my jr is so big this kgirl's pussy is so tiny I destroyed it booomm.  wtf?

self-aggrandizement, and there is nothing in a review like this that helps you decide whether or not the girl is a fit (no pun intended) for you.  Many newer reviewers compliment customers in a transparently disingenuous manner.  For example, I had one Kgirl who, when I entered her, said, "Too big!"  So, I said, "Sorry, I'll take it out", to which she quicky replied. "No, I like big."  I started laughing my ass off and called her out for her fake compliment.  After that first time, during repeats, I would always ask while entering, "Too Big?  Take it out?" and she would say, "No, I like big," and we would both laugh.  My point is, don't get a swelled head over a compliment from a Kgirl.  It's probably a lie.  Many guys who think they are packing meat got that idea from a Kgirl they saw and that's how it ends up in a review.  Lol

A given customer is not going to click with every provider they see.  Personalities vary and not every customer is compatible with every Kgirl socially.  I, too, have had success with Kgirls that had a few mediocre reviews.  The trick is to know which reviewers in your city like the same "types" of Kgirls you like, considering both appearance and service, and then give more weight to opinions of those reviewers when you are vetting a girl you haven't yet met.  I had my share of DDG women when I was young and didn't have to pay, so at this age, most Kgirls between 35 and 45 are generally attractive to me, so I focus on the service reports in the reviews to make my final decisions about who to see.  

To be honest, I’m fairly experienced in this scene. My path started with sites like Rubmaps and Backpage before I moved on to the "corgs." I initially switched to korg because I found the rates for J-girls more competitive, but past 3 years, I’ve shifted my focus strictly to K-girls.

While I’ve known about TER for a while, I never really bothered browsing the forums until recently. My main goal was to use reviews for fact-checking; I don’t trust the ages bookers post, and frankly, most bookers haven’t even seen the girls in person—they’re just relaying customer feedback.

However, the more I read, the more skeptical I’ve become. A lot of these reviews read like adult short stories rather than honest accounts. After looking back through some of your comments, I realized others have pointed this out too. It seems many people aren't fans of the "too much info" style and prefer straightforward, credible details over creative writing.

But the point of the post you're responding to was that you not only need to vet the provider you want to see but the reviewers whose reviews you're reading as well.

 
You'll find a lot of range in the reviews and the value of them for you. You can spend some time identifying the "ad" reviews (shill, agency, provider, fake - whatever you wish to call them) and just ignore those in most cases and then you need to look at what makes the review happy about sessions and be sure that aligns with you. If you are looking for certain types of sessions and someone else is looking for other things then those reviews are  not likely to be all that helpful for you. This holds regardless of what your core goal in reading reviews might be -- avoiding spending money you think was not that well spend or finding women to see that you will often want to repeat with.

 
The best way to vet any reviewers is when you can read a review of some provider you've already seen -- of pay the lesson fee and go see some of the ones you were interested in knowing in advance you are perhaps closer to TOFTT than acting on good information.

In my reviews, I try to hit the major categories most hobbyists want to see in reviews while also giving a little narrative on how the session went. The categories are; face, body, attitude, sex, English, age, and repeat. I always try to ask the provider her age. While some will deflect (how old do you think I am?) most will respond either with an age or a reaction that allows me to narrow it down. Although I could dumb it down on my reviews and just list the categories, I do think the extra context about a session is helpful. Unfortunately few reviewers hit on all of the above categories, making their reviews much less useful and subject to doubt. That’s why I like to see 10+ reviews before I can be really confident about a session with a new provider.  Several are outright fabrications, several only contain information on a few useful categories, and a few are thorough and quite useful! Sure if everyone followed my outline above many more reviews would be useful, but we are herding cats here! I do like the exercise of researching a provider by reading reviews, checking the reviewer’s history and finding other hot girls they have reviewed! It’s all good and part of the process!

If you see a fake review and can identify it as such you gained some information about the reviewer. So it's not utterly useless. It is useless of course for most people who don't research, keep track of girl rebrands and tours (some mongers can tell you which girl was at which org  at what time with which name) and shills etc.  

 
The reality is,  a place to read reviews should be providing minimally colored, minimum noise information datapoints, publicly.

I hate the fact that people have to engage in back channels just to get the real info. It goes against all collective point of a public review site. Then why even have public reviews in the first place if people are OK and fine with shill and fake info disseminating?

so how do you guys id fake ones?

I think rocket keeps a database and does text analysis to see if reviews from different reviewers are likely to be the same author, if there are plagiarized reviews the later dated one is most likely fake (or just some really laze person you why pay attention), cases of reviewer only reviewing one or two girls, often at an agency, and only those review, no other review. Some look at distribution of scores -- you can set your own limits on just where the end points should be and what the distribution should look like.

 
I never really worried about that distinction, particularly as I think many see reviews they don't agree with and just claim they are fake. Outside some glaring cases the probability that the claim of fake is true can drop pretty fast I think (but no one has the stats to produce a good probability estimate for fake). When using reviews just looked for reviews of girls I had seen and how the other reviewers graded. You'll find many here make that recommendation -- first hand verification of the reviewer -- here and it's sound advice. Then you really don't need to worry about assessing if a review is fake or not -- just assess will a review be helpful or not.  If I didn't have that for a base line then the reviews were potentially informative (regardless of how prolific the reviewer was or what their score distribution was) but always value unknown so use with caution for me. But I'm also much more tolerant and have less a problem with TOFTTOM (team of me) to get the information I want first hand.

Problem is it’s too short and won’t get approved. There’s also a big difference between being enthusiastic and simply checking boxes. I like a little additional color myself.