K-girls

Problematic Review
Avalon420 1745 reads
posted

The reviewer starts off by saying, "Leaving this review late as to not obstruct Barbara's flow of income" and if that weren't problematic enough, follows by mentioning that she might have HPV but he hasn't alerted the agency as he hopes they'll learn it from his review!  

Maybe he fears being blacklisted. Thankfully, she was mentioned a bit on another forum when she passed by the EC.

Don't know if the review in question is linked so the TER is 256729 and the review is by Mewmon.

team_rocket_qwerty142 reads

In many cases, contacting the agency and letting them know or implying their girl gave it to you can often result in BL.  

 

I mean, agencies will never admit girl x had an steedee, even if it was true. It's horrible for their business and girl reputation. Instead, the girl will continue working and get tested eventually (if she has symptoms, she'd get tested earlier). If she's positive, she will go on 1-2 week 'vacation'

 

Meanwhile, anyone who mentions it on a forum will get backlash for telling the truth because, well, it's an inconvenient truth.  

That's usually kinda how it works in kgirl world. So the result is, many mongers think it's useless to spread the world because the upside is only BL and ridicule.

This guy may have some kind of axe to grind with this girl or her org, so he wrote a "hit" piece about her.  Most mongers would have paid her and left as soon as they saw the "evidence".  This guy stayed to the end anyway.  Does that seem odd to anyone else?  I walked out once on  a girl that smelled like raw bread dough.  Obviously a yeast infection, so I paid her and  left after telling her she needed to get some crème for the yeast infection.  Once outside, I discreetly called the booker, told him about the situation, and asked him if I should go  to the drug store for her, or does he have someone that will do it?  He said he would take care of it right away, thanked me for letting him know and told me I would have a credit on the donation if I wanted to see her again after it was cleared up.  Not telling the booker is reckless and irresponsible IF YOU ARE CERTAIN OF WHAT YOU'RE REPORTING.  

 
What makes me suspicious is that he said they looked like "blackheads".  HPV pustules rarely are black.  Most often, they are white and mucous colored. What IS black and appears regularly on girls who shave their genitals are ingrown hairs.  They look like a bump or wart with a black center where the hair has looped over and gone back into the skin.   The other thing is that these warts from HPV do not grow overnight.  She has two other reviews BEFORE his in July.  Neither review mentions any kind of skin eruption.  From his description, there would have had to be there for the earlier part of the month.  They don't grow that fast.  I don't buy it from his description.  I  think its fake.  Putting this in a review if he's NOT certain is just as reckless and irresponsible as not reporting it if he IS certain.  Either way, this will run her out of town whether she has HPV or not.

team_rocket_qwerty151 reads

As usual, here you are making a pure assumption that puts the monger at fault (he must have an axe to grind) . How surprising! Not.  

 

It's great that you reported your adventure to a booker and he told you he/she would take care of it. Telling you that and taking care of it are two different things.

 

I actually agree with you that ideally it's best to tell, both the booker and fellow mongers. However, the situation is such that Ive heard more than one monger tell me that they were cussed out by booker and/or BLd by a booker by reporting the girls, and funny enough, the girls would go on vacation soon after btw. Many orgs, including bbfs orgs, don't test the girls until they leave. That's the reality of things.  

I do agree it's irresponsible to put shit in a review if you're not sure. It's also irresponsible for POs to blacklist you after you informed them of potential hazard to other clients,and keeping on advertising the girl.

a pure assumption that this reviewer is 1) completely honest, 2) At 23 years old, knows enough about HPV to be able to recognize it and correctly diagnose it, and 3) that he didn't tell the booker about it because he feared blacklisting, as the OP postulates, without personal knowledge, rather than because he wasn't CERTAIN it was HPV warts, in which case, if he was wrong, he DID risk BL.  If he wasn't CERTAIN it was HPV, he had no business putting it in a review.  

 
In one of his other reviews, he said a provider had liposuction and a tummy tuck, but failed to mention how he knew that.  He said you can "tell" when someone has had Lipo.  That's not what the Ads for Lipo say.  HE seems to be the one making reckless assumptions to me.  I'm willing to look at both sides of the coin, and in my post above, I stated what he should do if he's CERTAIN  of his 23 year old layman's diagnosis.  He didn't do that, so my assumption was that he WASN'T sure, and so he beat up ANOTHER girl's rep for no good reason.

team_rocket_qwerty155 reads

I did not make any of these assumptions you attributed to me. I never even referenced anything about this particular review. You, on other hand, clearly did. Your reading comprehension, as usual, is incredibly terrible.  

 

I merely mentioned why in kgirl world many mongers are very hesitant to report girls with stds both to orgs and monger forums/groups. Even if they are 100% sure and have seen only one girl in a span of a month and got infected.

 

And if one cares about monger health, it's also pretty clear that for a mongers health, hearing a false positive rumor/report and not seeing the provider, is strictly better than not hearing a rumor/report and seeing a positive provider. It's a better be safe than sorry type of thing.  

So, it's always beneficial for mongers to hear any rumor/report of a girl potentially having issues in that area, no matter how true it is. If, of course, one puts monger health above girls feelings, their rep, orgs rep (ie BL) and other nonsense (nonsense to me, of course).

over the years who contracted an STD, and I can't think of a single time the girl in question did not take at least 10 days off for the antibiotics to run their course before returning to work.  A bigger threat is mongers who don't voluntarily "bench" themselves if they catch something, especially the PSE hounds. If they're high volume, they could start their own pandemic in a matter of weeks. Lol

team_rocket_qwerty177 reads

I agree with you about mongers who don't take precautions or don't get tested.

Ideally, imo, this is what should happen:

Monger gets std (either via test or symptoms) , he doesn't know the source. He calls/texts PO and says I got tested I got the clap/whatever (house in virginia is different, so I'll kinda sidestep this)  and I've seen some of your girls. PO says thanks, I'll make sure to test all my girls and does so. Monger takes a break, preferrably 3+weeks.

Monger gets std, he knows he's only seen one girl. He tells PO I got it from your girl I'm 100% sure I can't get it from my hand. PO says thanks I will handle it and does so. Monger reports it to the community. Girl immediately stops working.  

If girl is ever tested positive, org/PO make a psa about it and text anyone who's seen the girl to get tested asap. Girl immediately stops working.  

A lot of transparency here and everyone wins here (well, as much as you can win with the clap and zpack treatment). We all understand risks, but everyone is respected and everyone cares about each others health.  

 

In reality, everyone withholds information because of fear. Yes, mongers too. Fear of reputation, business, blacklist and so on.  

One great thing about legal prostitution in tijuana, is that those girls at HK have their papers and get tested like every week.

He will go to any means necessary in order to take the K-girls side against anyone - whether it's a "hater" like me or even another monger.  Here, he desperately dug through Mewmon's old reviews to find any "dirt" he could use against him.  In his first review in February, 2016, Mewmon says he was 19.  Mathematical genius CDL extrapolated that to mean Mewmon is 23 today - JULY, 2020.  In fact, Mewmon could have turned 20 in February, March, April, May,  June or July of 2016, meaning he could be 24 today.  And that's not even including the 90 days he had to post the review.  Mewmon could have seen her three months before the review was posted.  There's more than a 50% chance that Mewmon is 24 today, but of course CDL went with 23 to insult the guy's knowledge by making him younger and less experienced.

 
CDL puts the monger down because he's only 23/24.  How does CDL know that at 23 or 24 a man doesn't know enough about HPV to recognize it?  He's insulting the monger's young age just to take the K-girl's side.

 
Next, CDL goes digging through Mewmon's reviews for more "dirt" to use against him in to trash his credibility in order to protect K-girls.  And he comes up with this gem - Mewmon should have given his bona fides to be able to "tell" if a woman has had liposuction done.  CDL argues that you CANNOT tell if a woman has had lipo.  And what is the basis of CDL's knowledge that you can't tell if a woman has had lipo?  Because "That's not what the Ads for Lipo say."

 
"THAT'S NOT WHAT THE ADS FOR LIPO SAY."  Are you fucking kidding me?!?!  BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!  CDL has NO first-hand knowledge of what lipo looks like or whether another man can tell if a woman has had lipo but he'll take the word of ADVERTISERS over a fellow K-monger.  Sure, because advertisers ALWAYS tell the truth.  What a fucking idiot!!

 
Only a handful of K-mongers ever read CDL's posts critically and only a couple ever question his "pearls of wisdom."  Why don't you wise up and see that he's almost always on the side of the K-girls, bookers and orgs.  Ask yourselves what his agenda REALLY is.  But apparently you don't care.  You're content with the crumbs of info about the K-girls that he throws out to you.  That's the same exact pattern as when Harpman was king of the K-board.  The other mongers followed him like sheep.  That's exactly what you're doing with CDL.  Good luck.  I won't say I told you so.

-- Modified on 7/25/2020 8:16:46 PM

team_rocket_qwerty159 reads

I'm not quite sure why this is a reply to my post, because I'm probably the last monger on here you should be telling that he's always on kgirls side... or that I don't care.

Posted By: BigPapasan
Re: CDL: Always taking the K-girls side, even against K-mongers...

 Why don't you wise up and see that he's almost always on the side of the K-girls, bookers and orgs.  Ask yourselves what his agenda REALLY is.  But apparently you don't care.  You're content with the crumbs of info about the K-girls that he throws out to you.  That's the same exact pattern as when Harpman was king of the K-board.  The other mongers followed him like sheep.  That's exactly what you're doing with CDL.  Good luck.  I won't say I told you so.

-- Modified on 7/25/2020 8:16:46 PM

To show the POSSIBILITY that I MIGHT be off on his age by 6 months,  so what is the point of that, since you proved nothing?  I stand by my own opinion that a guy that age probably doesn't know what HPV pustules look like, or he "would have described them correctly."  I'm not saying she didn't have SOMETHING going on down there, but it was reckless to call it something that he wasn't sure of.  Would you want some guy writing a review that claimed a girl YOU had seen had visual evidence (that he goes on to  describe incorrectly) that she was infected with Herpes or HIV in a flippant way (he went on to finish the session when most guys would have bolted immediately)?  

 
As you admit in the beginning to being a "hater" ( you should also admit to being a racist), the rest of your post is just your standard, predictable Kgirl-board "HATER" rant, so its TSTTT.  You spend all of your time either bashing Kgirls or those of us who see them.  Get a life.  

...from defending your answer about liposuction.  A K-monger wrote in a review that he could tell a K-girl had liposuction.  You were so desperate to defend K-girls at all costs, even against K-mongers, that you criticized the reviewer for not giving his credentials to be able to "tell" when a woman has had liposuction.

 
You have no knowledge about liposuction at all.  So how did you contradict the K-monger's statement that he could "tell" the K-girl had lipo?  You said:  "That's not what the Ads for Lipo say."  
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/k-girl-113/and-as-usual-you-are-making-----19358?frmSearch=1#19358

 
THAT'S NOT WHAT THE ADS FOR LIPO SAY.  That has to be the stupidest statement in the history of TER.  Ads?!?!?!  Really?!?!  Because ads are always truthful, right?  I saw an ad that a Nigerian prince is giving away millions of dollars.  I also saw that the Brooklyn Bridge is for sale.  I'll send you the links so you can jump right on those great deals.

 
But that's the length you'll go to to protect K-girls against any negative comment.  You'll trash anyone, even K-mongers, who dare to say anything the least bit negative against K-girls.  You had nothing to contradict the reviewer about liposuction so all you could say is: "That's not what the Ads for Lipo say."  How fucking stupid!!

dozens of Kgirls that have had Lipo, and they use a scar eraser cream called Mederma (they say the night version works best while you sleep) to get rid of the entry point scars.  Some have also successfully erased Caesarian scars with it. I agree it was a stupid statement.  Most jokes are meant to be stupid and not believable .  You are really on your game to call it out as stupid.  However, once again, you took it seriously because you have no sense of humor.  So is my serious answer about having  first hand visual knowledge and knowledge of the treatment good enough to kick your ass for the night?  I  think it is.  Bwahahahahahaha

 
Thanks for providing tonight's entertainment.  You really are quite the clown without even knowing it. You are so fucking easy to bait.  Do we get one of your meltdowns now that  you're made an ass out of yourself?  Lol

...something incredibly stupid, which is quite often, you claim it was a joke.  Typical bullshit - I called you on it before, but you had no reply.  Crickets.  So you furiously researched lipo scars and came up with "Mederma" to try and save face.  Pathetic.

I just post what I know.  I actually used Mederma myself when I had a surgery a few years ago after finding out about it from Kgirls who had used it on scars.  It does work.  Just because your own depth of knowledge is so shallow doesn't mean those of us with more education and experience than you  don't know the things that we post about.  Again, you have no way to rebut my post, so you go right into the personal attack.  Predictable, but its all you've got.  Once again, you add nothing to the conversation except trying to save your own ass over not having a sense of humor.  You got baited and now you look stupid, . . . . yet again.  No way out this time.  Keep digging at your own peril.  

I never trust these monger reports of disease on a public forum. It must have happened at least once. But in all the years I’ve been mongering and active in forums I have never seen one of these be accurate.
It is 99% probable (and 87% of all statistics are made up on the spot) that this is yet another troll post.  
The only times I’ve experienced accurate reports of K-girl issues from drug problems to disease has been through PMs.  
At this point I believe that anyone who posts this kind of info publicly has a hidden or not so hidden agenda.

Yes Jensen, his claim that he could "tell" that another girl he reviewed had liposuction and a tummy tuck is what made confirmed my doubts that, at 23 years old, he would be able to correctly recognize and diagnose HPV warts, since his description of them was not accurate.  

Equally important, did you read her four other reviews from July, 3 by guys with 20+ reviews and the fourth guy has 10+ reviews. Two were posted before the critical review, two after. None saw the symptoms described by the critical reviewer. It would be surprising that four experienced hobbyists would miss what the critical reviewer states are obvious lesions. I’m not buying it.

I saw her and noticed nothing like what he described. She’d be committing professional suicide to go to work with something like that.

Since you’ve been precipitating and perpetuating fake STD rumors for so many years, it’s reasonable to assume the real reason that your only sexual activity consists of talking about it on the forums is that you have been diagnosed yourself.
Though I don’t think very highly of you, I wouldn’t wish that even on you.
I hope you recover.

Register Now!