Write Review
2,069,761 Total Reviews 3,851 New Reviews
19,170 Users Online

K-girls

Please do
team_rocket_qwerty 109 reads
posted

This is an LA-only "feature" where kgirls allow themselves to be booked through multiple bookers, through multiple sites. It's extremely annoying.

BigPapasan1045 reads

...only one number apart.  Who would like to report it to TER and have the profiles combined?

 
http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/lucy-2133209456-354546
http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/lucy-3238410466-354547

 
Hmmm, I wonder if Booker Gray knows that Lucy is a Candygirl...and vice versa.

ReplyQuoteReport
team_rocket_qwerty110 reads

This is an LA-only "feature" where kgirls allow themselves to be booked through multiple bookers, through multiple sites. It's extremely annoying.

ReplyQuoteReport
BigPapasan128 reads

...this thread to show that K-girls are free to choose to be repped by one agency or multiple agencies.

ReplyQuoteReport
CENZO1102 reads

I caught the same type of thing regarding provider Nana. On 11/6  I provided to them the two different TER ID numbers via the problem report link on one of the listed profiles. I received a notice that my report was unapproved. The reason listed was “N/A”. There was no further explanation. Sooo - you tell me.
BTW the two ID numbers are still up:  Nana - 351702 and Nana - 242020. Take care!

ReplyQuoteReport
BigPapasan132 reads

TER did combine them.  I don't know why they did it for my Problem Report and not yours.

ReplyQuoteReport
Post Reply Back To Forum
Register Now!