was dark for 20 months during most of 2018-2019. When they started back up in December, I have been trying to catch situations like this after realizing we had two Nanas and two Chanels in LA that were completely different girls and guys were posting their reviews on the wrong girls. There was no need for me to look back beyond December. I'm not confused, but guys that are putting reviews in the wrong places apparently ARE confused. It probably doesn't matter to you anymore, because once you reviewed 5 Kgirls, you were finished helping the Kgirl community, but even if you are only reading the reviews contributed by others, you should still care about whether the review is of the right girl or not, lest you make a choice on bogus information. I tried to be gracious and thanked you for the additional information, even though it had nothing to do with my point, but if you want to be dick and make an attack based on my age, that's your choice. Just remember this . . . . even at this age, I'm willing to bet that I get more Kgirl pussy in a week then you do in a month. You're basically a Kgirl lurker, not a real monger.
There are two different girls in OC going by the name, "Velvet." If you review either one of them, please make sure you put your review on the right profile page. I had to report one in the wrong place already.
340350 is the one that has come to ca-kdolls two or three times in the past year. 352126 is a new girl that hasn't been to OC before that I'm aware of, at least not as velvet, but could be a rebrand.
A modest proposal but back in the day a guy with a book named Red came up with a shorthand for identifying ladies and their orgs, which was to refer to the latter by locale and the last 4 of the phone number. That way, "Coco @ Santa Clara 1234" was clearly a different individual than "Coco @ Foster City 5678". The proliferation of independent bookers may complicate the situation a bit but usually one number can usually be associated with one or the other.
If you review someone with a Profile, I recommend mentioning the TER Profile ID# in the General section. I used to mention TER IDs in the General section of my Reviews, such as: "This is a review of Coco ### and not Coco ###, Coco ### or Coco ### who are all different Cocos. Coco ### was also known as Cherry and their Profiles have been merged into Coco / Cherry." That way, if there is a mistake and, worse, a merger of reviews of different Cocos, you can still separate them out. (Although it would be good if TER had some sort of internal tag in order to UNDO such an erroneous merge.) . It's almost ancient history, but the league folks used to have a pretty good website with an archive of photos and names that made it possible to match new names with old faces. When touring girls came to the east coast but chose a new name, it was often possible to find their Reviews under their west coast names using the concordance. Such a name - photo archive (maintained offshore, of course) would be REALLY helpful. I wonder if it could be set up with some help from TER, as a TER spinoff?
Posted By: coeur-de-lion
There are two different girls in OC going by the name, "Velvet." If you review either one of them, please make sure you put your review on the right profile page. I had to report one in the wrong place already.
340350 is the one that has come to ca-kdolls two or three times in the past year. 352126 is a new girl that hasn't been to OC before that I'm aware of, at least not as velvet, but could be a rebrand.
Unfortunately it looks like your attempt to purchase VIP membership has failed due to your card being declined. Good news is that we have several other payment options that you could try.
VIP MEMBER
, you are now a VIP member!
We thank you for your purchase!
VIP MEMBER
, Thank you for becoming VIP member!
Membership should be activated shortly. You'll receive notification!
