you included the s -- if you paste that into the link URL input it will work. If you paste into the message area then just use http and it will be clickable.
Is the Tia at klovers the same kgirl that allegedly took a monger for $17,000 back at ND?
Is Blue the same Blue that gets the rave reviews down South?
Any Intel on Bianca and Soyi?
TIA
Dunno if it's the same as down south, but I gave her a shot a couple days ago
AVOID AT ALL COST! (CURRENTLY $$.5 WASTED!)
SHE'S PRETTY, BUT A DEAD FISH WITH A SLOUGH OF RULES AND NO DATY, TOUCHING ANYTHING, FIV/FOV, ETC.
SAG
Sounds like the same "Blue" that I met over there about a year ago. A complete waste of money.
Not the same Tia, and the reviews of this one have been mostly bad. I heard she's on the older side. She also goes back and forth to LA.
The Tia that supposedly hustled the monger at ND had a good looking face, somewhat exotic actually, allowed PSE and had pretty good reviews.
Davina, Alice and Daisy at EBK...
Look familiar? All are GFE only; Davina's glams are DDG for the eye candy mongers...
https://ebk510.escorts.biz/models
Hey bros, why isn't my link working? Thanks!
YEMV
-- Modified on 5/5/2021 1:54:57 PM
The link only works for me if I access it through Google rather than directly. Strange. I obviously can't confirm if the same girls are using their pictures, but the pictures for Daisy were Young in NoVa and those for Davina were Milky, although the agency for the latter went defunct about a year ago, so you won't find recent reviews from here.
Alice was here at AA. She's Thai, younger and storefront-like service according to mongers
Daisy Ive seen pics of here before and I think LA. Will get back once I remember who she was before.
Davina I'm not so sure about.
try
http://ebk510.cuties-sites.com
They changed it around the beginning of 2021.
you included the s -- if you paste that into the link URL input it will work. If you paste into the message area then just use http and it will be clickable.
The highlighting of the link is not working because it has https (and might I say ter needs to get with the times - https is standard across the web)
But also the link itself that twoon posted is bad. Look at weinerpeddlers link instead.
And, Floorhump with the rebrand assist!
to YOUR way rather than YOU doing it THEIR way, as Jensen correctly stated. Does your sense of self-importance have no limits?
The fuck?
Https is a security standard employed by most websites to protect people from malicious entities. If you use https, your browser will check certificates for the website and at least make sure it is a valid nonexpied certificate, ie the website is what it says it is.
Pretty much any online website uses https,including this very one. Most online links have https in them. Omitting the secure (https) literally lowers the security.
I don't want ter to change to my way, I merely hope they can change to accommodate basic technological changes to keep the users more protected.
"...but like many older guys, I have hired a lot of bright younger people for my business that know all about this stuff so that I don't have to.
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/k-girl-113/i-will-plead-guilty-----15676?frmSearch=1#15676
He was just trying to bust your balls because he's a Luddite when it comes to tech.
CDL: "I'm lost without my tech guys."
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/k-girl-113/re-puss---avec-laccent-aigu--zut-alors-----8113?frmSearch=1#8113
CDL: "Thanks for haviing my back . . . . .
on the tech stuff. I have "guys" so I don't personally know about a lot that of stuff unless is something I personally use frequently.
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/k-girl-113/thanks-for-haviing-my-back------8467?frmSearch=1#8467
Just because YOU haven't evolved doesn't mean I haven't either. Grasp at straws much? Bwahahahahaha
....endlessly crowing that you learned how to use a VPN. BFD. ROFL!
If you think that rocket is the first person to suggest that an 'https' link be made clickable in the body of a post, you'd be an idiot. Never mind, you ARE an idiot. Here is the first time the suggestion was made - 9/24/2010:
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/suggestion-and-policy-4/nit-picks-6459?frmSearch=1#6459
And again FIVE years ago:
"It's a pain in the arse to edit links to remove the 's' from "https". Lots of sites use SSL... like TER for example! So if one wants to include a link to a TER page, they have to first remove the 's'. "
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/suggestion-and-policy-4/allow-https-on-links--13918?frmSearch=1#13918
TER itself changed from "http" to "https." There's no reason they can't change to making "https" links clickable in the body of a post.
You really are a moron for picking such a picayune thing to criticize rocket about. Get a life, loser.
TER does in fact support https links. They just need to be in the provide Link URL input.
I suppose is anyone wants to talk about consistency the big question is not about allowing https links in the message area be clickable but why the http does form a link when TER (as do many other sites) prevents all the other http tags and functions (for security reasons no doubt).
I would think the goal of the support for the links in TER is to allow providers to put their personal site/ad in their posts (one of the services offered by TER) and to allow the picture links (since TER doesn't want to host a bunch of image files). I suspect in the design stage TER did NOT plan on supporting a bunch of links in the discussions, particularly not ones then are often completely unrelated to a provider.
Correct, this is about parsing the links to make them clickable.
This is easily circumvented by simply copy pasting a https link, but a lot of people refuse to do this for whatever reason. Even though copy pasting link usually makes you less susceptible to ph_ishing as you usually see what you copied.
Thanks for the assist on the link...
EBK five minutes away...
Be interested if you bros think Davina is gorgeous too?!
From what I've heard in my area, it appears as though Daisy provides a better experience than Davina. If the Blue there is the same one that was here, then you can't go wrong with her. Total milf experience.
Any intel on Holly DD or Abella?
Holly has been at the org for a couple weeks now and haven’t seen a single review. Abella is new but looks familiar.
The kgirls at EBK are now charging $50 extra for MSOG. Offerings include two GFE and Two PSE kgirls for those amongst us who prefer no rules.
Party on my monger brothers!!!!
This has been reduced to useless info because the only thing changing faster than their rip-off prices is their line up of retreads.
sag
WTF?!
EBK new fee schedule on July 1st is $270 / hr plus $50 for MSOG.
No thanks EBK, not on my radar anymore...
-- Modified on 6/16/2021 1:46:35 PM
Twoon, I predict prices will rise so much at some point it will be value-wise sound to visit storefronts again. You are a MSOG guy too, so yeah you'll probably have to pay damn near 500 for all inclusice menu. Just like it's happening in LA.
Nobody likes to pay more for something they have come to expect at a certain price, but think of it this way, . . . . . . . . . . . .
I REALLY like to eat prime steak. If steaks went up 25-35% all at once, would I refuse to pay the higher price and become a vegetarian? Not hardly. And so it goes with pussy, IMHO. (I admit to being a Vagitarian. I can eat 'em all day long. Its a little known fact that pussy is one of the six major food groups that we need every day. I think a doctor told me that once. Well, maybe he wasn't a real doctor, but I took his advice anyway. Lol)
I don't think there was as any overreaction there,cdl.
Twoons reaction was completely benign, especially considered reaction on some other boards and groups.
While your analogy is not wrong, I think it misses the point of the concern mongers are experiencing over rising prices without the rising quality of providers, especially if they're used to mongering in the pre-pandemic environment. I'm of the opinion that K-milfs are still worth $3.2, but I understand where others are coming from.
The quality of the steak doesn't go up either, only the price. Are you a vegetarian yet? Lol