I swear most of the K-Girl pictures on City Vibe are of the same girl. Does anyone agree with me that the pictures of Miko, Darby, and Tina are the same girl? Yet when I read the reviews they say the pictures are accurate. I am a confused. I saw Darby and believe the pictures are her, even though they may be a little old. Am I hallucinating or what? I mainly rely on the reviews more than the pictures.
doing the photoshopping definitely is in a rut. Have seen Tina and Miko and they are definitely different girls. Tina seems to be the most popular of the three right now.
Coeur-de-lion: I notice how prolific you are. What do you think of the Thai girls in O.C.?
You're right about the way the reviews are posted. Why is the description of the first review shown above the narration of all the following reviews. Why not show the entire review for each submission? This can be misleading. As far as the pics: I swear it is the same round-faced petite girl in probably about four or five different girls. I'm not rich or prolific enough to visit them all to see who is who. That's why I depend on the reviews.
Thai was an acquired taste. Didn't even try any until I was three years into the hobby. I think it is hit or miss in that there is less consistency than with Kgirls or Viet girls. The rate is lower, so when you occasionally get a dud, it doesn't hurt the wallet as much. My favorite Thai girl is Micha, who divides her time between OC and Pasadena. A petite, tight spinner with a great personality and superlative skills.
-- Modified on 2/24/2016 9:27:39 PM
I'm into Thai and Viet and Japanese... any J-Girl recommends?
Funny, you bring this up because I have a hard time with K-girls. I don't like them as much as J-Girls. And yes, I feel like the ad's on CV don't give me a good sense. Instead, I'm always running to the reviews to get more insight.
I will try to get my review up in the next few days.
did you mean to say the reviews say the pics are "inaccurate"? Problem is that the accurate pics part of the TER profile is dependent on the first person to create a review (I think). Wish the providers would all just use video clips and candid photos. Way better than photoshop in my opinion
It's funny too how TER has body types "Skinny" "Thin" and "Athletic" and "Average" -- they feel similar to me. I do multiple searches.
But it would be a case where I would rather check boxes on a search to cover multiple types. Same thing with some services.
It really depends a lot on the booker. Some like to blur faces, think WLA and SM. Some are unblurred and accurate, Cola comes to mind. MW girls are a mixed bag where they photoshop the same face onto the body of the actual girl. You can pick these out pretty easily. Probably would be better just to blur out the face, but ehh who cares? I think you get a good sense >90% of the time.
Another regional thing, I guess. In NYC, many AMP incalls use real pics but with photoshopping. Tattoos are mostly removed but the thing that bothers me the most is when they carve out a skinny hourglass figure on someone who turns out to be very pretty, with a great physique, but hardly an hourglass (or wasp waist). That kind of disappointment is very annoying to me
Many times I see ads where the pics don't match the written vital statistic. This is most obvious to me with bra sizes. The pictures portray hooters that border on huge but the ad copy says B-cups. There is an obvious disconnect.
I also see a lot of pics where the size of the caboose is ridiculously large for the lady's frame. And while there are exceptions like Rozel for instance, where the lady does indeed sport a copious booty they are few and very far between. I am an ass-man so I generally avoid those ladies whose pics to my eye are promising more than will be delivered.
I think you are right about the face. I swear the face of Rita, Callie, Miko, Tina, and the new Winnie are the same round face of the same girl. (They are mainly in Orange County but rotate to L.A.) Reviews are still mostly positive of all the girls despite the ambiguous photos. K-Girls is my mainstay agency to go to.
almost all the girls has a photoshoot when they land. Rarely will an owner use pics of a samegirl.
The main reason they look the same is combination of the nonkoreans who cant recognize like they cant guess the girls age and the plastic surgery. Theres a term in korea called a "gangnam face" its where due to plastiv surgery all the girls look hot but look like twins. You can search the web about it. Type "gangnam" face. Its a derogatory term cause the girls who get these surgeries are usually room salon prostitutes.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2015/05/16/stunning-photos-show-why-south-korea-is-the-plastic-surgery-capital-of-the-world/
Washington Post, May 2015, "Stunning photos show why S. Korea is the plastic surgery capital of the world."
http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2015/03/23/about-face
New Yorker, March 2015, "About Face: Why is South Korea the world’s plastic-surgery capital?"
http://www.businessinsider.com/eyelid-surgery-in-south-korea-2015-11
Business Insider, November 2015, "Why Korean parents are having their kids get plastic surgery before college"
And many other similar stories.
Thanks for the links.
There have been several news stories about the cosmetic surgery in SK and Seoul has even setup a Medical Tourist website, supporting several languages, to help foreigners navigate and get fair prices. Apparently one of the issues was that intermediaries were "helping" the foreign customer and basically charging two or three times the actual cost of the procedure to get a hefty commission.
More recently it seems that (not surprising given the reference to the look) most procedures are performed in Gangnam and there is so much competitions now it's seen as something of a race to the bottom type of market.
Forgetting the name but it's on Amazon Prime, there is is a good, though sad (it's a tragedy), Korean movie that addresses this cultural fad(?) and some of the consequences.
Perhaps it's just me but when I look at the side-by-side image it's not the eye that I see as making any difference but the makeup -- and I think the girl on the left (same girl I assume in a before and after) with the makeup on the right would be more beautiful.
Or maybe they are both photoshopped