I just clicked on the first class girls link you provided and it went to the page offering the site for sale.
Saw this on another site and it seems that I'm not the only one who saw an interesting similarity between the new web site TheFirstClassGirls.com and BunnyGirlsClub.com. Allegedly First Class Girls is a newly formed wholly owned subsidiary of the Bunny Girls Club fluffle.
thefirstclassgirls.com .... sorry folks
-- Modified on 11/14/2020 6:41:06 PM
-- Modified on 11/14/2020 6:42:17 PM
I just clicked on the first class girls link you provided and it went to the page offering the site for sale.
Mauibro I'm intrigued...
Firstclassgirls.com and firstclasskgirls.com no worky.
Link please?
Bunnygirlsclub.com working. Liking Louisa's glams...
Liked Somavox's review. TER ID # 347452
👍
-- Modified on 11/14/2020 7:02:41 PM
thefirstclassgirls.com/
Way to look out Robbie!
Dior # 354043 and Taylor look familiar. Meh...
I'll stick with Jesi and Bora as my alts to vampire kgirl.
-- Modified on 11/14/2020 7:40:05 PM
Dior is a bit chubby but still cute, young, willing.
Taylor may never arrive (sad sigh)
That's funny, Mr advertiser, that you do say here that Dior is "a bit chubby", yet in your review - which was the first one for her, BTW - you very conveniently neglected to mention ANYTHING about that.
Wouldn't that information be extremely valuable to anyone who reads the reviews? Probably exactly why you neglected to mention it.
I knew this would bring you out of the sewer to post more of your pointless thoughts that few on earth give a shit about, except to take a dump on you of course.
Pointless? No, this is a site about reviews, and I'm asking you a very valid question.
Once again, you mentioned nothing about Dior being "chubby" (and "a bit" seems like an understatement according to other info I have) in your review. Why is that? Sounds like you didn't want anyone else to not seer her if they were to read that. Am I wrong?
You were the very first reviewer and you put "pics accurate".
http://thefirstclassgirls.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/dior_watermark_05.jpg
This badly PSd pic shows a very thin body. How are the pics accurate if she is chubby? Chubby is one of the things that make mongers not see the girl.
I am anxiously awaiting your review if Dior, or any other girl for that matter. Your forum post to review ratio is abut 200:1 now I think.
Dior? Why would I see her?
As far as reviews go, you can read my reviews of "any other girl" here:
http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/searchbyreviewerResults.asp?MemberName=team_rocket_qwerty
You're welcome.
Now, may you answer my question as to why you neglected the obviously very important part of Dior being chubby out of your generic review?
-- Modified on 11/16/2020 11:20:35 AM
Warning: Long post ahead.
Against my better judgement, I’m going to go ahead and respond to one of your pointless posts, Rocket.
You call Maui an “advertiser” just because he compiles all the info from ads and web sites (which he’s been doing for years ever since he got tired of all the manual searching) and sometimes lets us know what he finds if he thinks it’s interesting? Anybody else would call that a service. At the same time you give twoon a complete pass on his good natured shilling (it’s just too good hearted for anybody but you to get annoyed by it) just because he’s nice to you. If anybody else does it, though, you’re all over them. Yeah, you aren’t biased at all.
I notice you still haven’t had the guts to stop using an alias. Are you still too afraid that many will block you and not read these ridiculous posts of yours? Please spare us all the “but i post the link to my reviews all the time” excuse. That’s only half the point and not the important part. Every time someone brings this up you only focus on the fact that you post that link to your little list of reviews. And, for a guy who is all about reviews, you have extraordinarily few of them.
And don’t even attempt to distract by pointing out that I don’t have many reviews. I’m not the one who uses most of his posts to criticize the reviews of others.
You want to post on here like you think you are the Overlord of All Fuckboards. But you don’t have the guts to do it in a way that allows others to completely ignore you.
I’m getting really tired of your nonsense. And I’m sure I’m not the only one. So grow a pair of balls and stop posting with an alias so we can all block you if we want. You are far too proud of your technical skills to sell your excuse of “I didn’t know that using an alias would prevent people from blocking me”.
Even PapSmear has more guts than you do. He lets people block him. So, show us all. Do you have the guts to stop hiding behind an alias?
Yeah, yeah. I know this post is a waste of time. You’re going to pretend to misread it and then misquote me and continue to put on airs as the one and only Advocate of All Mongers when all you really are is an Analyst of Statistics and Shit (and really just a wannabe analyst at that) as evidenced by your myopic focus on review data. Yet not a single bit of effort from you to actually improve the systems. It’s obvious that you just want attention.
-- Modified on 11/16/2020 12:00:25 PM
-- Modified on 11/16/2020 12:15:17 PM
Yawn. I started posting on this forum in April or May or something like that. At the time I had no idea how the alias system works. I had no idea you can't block someone if they're an alias. There are multiple people posting all over the forums with an alias and no one has issue with it. Only you are trying to push me into posting with my "real handle". No, sorry, I will post with my rocket name. I tried looking into signatures and signatures don't work on this forum. I'm not going to lose my existing reviews or my name. Sorry. You're delusional if you think I'm doing it only so you cant ignore me. I don't care who ignores me.
Now I'm going to answer your question about Maui, and I'm not going to pull back punches here. I call him Mr advertiser, because he's proven time and time again, that he's more concerned with orgs and girls getting advertisements and money than about correct info provided to mongers. I've experienced it directly and indirectly. He back stabbed me over some bgc advertisement I refused to be posted on non-ad forums on donkey. Maui had constantly boosted all orgs on switter, at some point he was doing it every day. What kind of regular monger does that? Do cdl Jensen or gag do that? Maui also attempted to review the same provider from two different accounts here on TER.
I guess I can call him an insider too, according to your own terminology. It's simple, really. We were on good terms once. I shouldve listened to some people telling me who he was, but I've ignored it against my better judgment. I truly thought he was a good guy. I was wrong.
Nowhere do I behave Iike some overlord of
Fuckboards (why plural btw? I thought you're only on TER). I post info I have anywhere I can to help as many as I can.
I don't approve of twoons light shilling, and we've had our run-ins on donkey. And I've called him out on it, many times. I don't see him constantly advertising on switter or other platforms. If you want to talk about double standards though, you should look no further than your definition of "negative reviews" and mauis review from way back when I asked you if that's a such example. Oh the hoops you jumped through to not answer that question.
Attention? I don't want attention. I want attention on Dior, so it's well known that shes much chubbier than her pics, deemed as 'pics accurate' on TER review. And I'd like people who post first reviews of girls to mention that in the reviews.
And not a single bit of effort? Me addressing the initial reviewer of Dior is exactly this effort. I'm asking if he says she's chubby on the forum, why no mention of it in the review and why 'pics accurate'?
Many mongers make their decisions via the first review.
I try to help any mongers as long as I have info to help them. I don't brag about it, I just do it. On many boards. Mongers often need help in deciphering bs from reality, identifying rebrands, shills and so on. I'm glad to help anyone, even people I have had run-in with, such as twoon, you, brecho, muffdiver and so on. Hell, when it concerns org and girl safety, I'm willing to help them as well. But enough about that. You trying to paint me as some egoistic clown. All I want is honesty and truth.
What you call advertising, pretty much everyone else calls sharing valuable information. Many of us asked him to do that, because we knew he was collecting it for himself.
Maybe you’re just jealous because he was helping far more people in more tangible ways than you ever have. That seems like the most plausible explanation.
So, still afraid to get rid of your little shield to protect you from being ignored? Even if you didn’t know at the time, which seems highly likely, you know now. And you have very little work to do to switch over your username. Sure, if you had a couple of dozen reviews it might seem like a lot of work. But you don’t.
It’s looking more and more like you are simply posturing to get attention.
-- Modified on 11/16/2020 8:16:20 PM
Boosting girl ads on switter constantly is collecting information?
Lmao. I've seen your profile on there, I didn't see you boosting all orgs daily. I've watched people's patterns on switter for a while.
Answer me, how is spamming all orgs ads daily NOT advertising? I'm probably not going to get answer to that either.
I already told you I'm not switching to another profile on your whim. My name is my name, and I have currently 8 reviews, and there will be more.
Here's a free advice : you can just ignore my posts and not read them nor reply to them.
Is it too hard of a concept to grasp for someone who thinks that negative reviews for kgirls are useless on a review site? Maybe, I wouldn't know.
-- Modified on 11/17/2020 11:36:12 AM
Boosting toots on Switter is not Collecting information, no. Boosting toots on Switter is Spreading or Sharing information.
SMH
Sorry, used the wrong word, should be "spreading", not collecting.
Boosting toots daily for all orgs is spreading information?
Lol. It's advertising at its finest. 90% of the time the lineups don't change. What are you spreading? It's like that dude who posts lineups daily over at Jackson forum.
Again, you should really embrace what you are,mr advertiser. You chose girls over mongers on every step of the way, you want people to believe you are "sharing" information. You went back on your own word to me over a shitty advertisement you tried to sneak in using an alias. Why would you need a new account to share information? Where they do that at?
Again this isn't about you, but you and your buddy keep asking what makes you an advertiser. So I'm simply replying.
My goal is simply to make it known which people have invested interest or can't bring themselves to say something negative about the product, to other mongers, so they aren't disappointed. You just happen to be one of those people. Too bad. I don't like liars, backstabbers and people who choose girls and orgs over fellow mongers.
Finally, a breakthrough. Please post the rules that we all must follow when submitting reviews or posting to the forums. I'm sure that once we all know your rules for this site (and others?) then we'll comply.
You are welcome to post whatever you like on forum or reviews,as long as it's not an explicit advertisement - I believe there are specific forums for that called ad forums. I may not like you, but I will defend your right to post whatever you want as long as it's not egregious advertising (ie, posting of lineup and a link, new girl! And a link and so on). The only exception is a shill thread like twoon has going on.
Now, If I think someone is shilling or trying to make a girl look better than she is, Ill let it be known. It's really simple. I advocate honesty and truth about orgs and girls.
I don't make any rules btw. Ter has rules in place about advertising. So did the donkey. There were specific forums used for advertising that are still utilized by the orgs, including this new one, btw.
Cheers
I have not interest in and didn't ask to see your reviews, just making a comment about your frequency of spouting off here in the forums while not sharing any significant information via reviews.
How would you know it's obvious or important if you haven't seen Dior for yourself?
If you don't like my review(s) then ignore them like I ignore yours.
You literally said you anxiously await my review of Dior or any girl. Was that another lie?
Lol at not sharing any significant information.
Most mongers want to hear whether or not the pics are correct (including face and body type) and service. I make sure to include this in all of my reviews.
So again, if Dior is much chunkier than what is shown on the pics (and on the pics she is shown as very slim), I'm interested to know why you didn't mention that in your review or put 'pics accurate' when it isn't true.
All I can reply with is to acknowledge that your skewing, abuse and butchering of the English language is truly impressive. I'm sure your mama is proud.
Oh wow, you're now involving my relatives in this. I must have struck a nerve.
Funny how it went from discussing Dior and her being chubby and your review - all extremely on-topic things - to my mama.
That's fine though, Ill let that be on your conscience.
Read the opening post, this thread is not about Dior, or any other girl. SMH
You were discussing Dior with twoon.
If you weren't, I wouldve never replied to your post. As much as an advertiser I think you are, you ARE providing some information here, even if it's a thinly veiled ad. Same as in the other forum.
Now, the fact that you mentioned her being chubby and don't mention it in your review, triggered my response. Sorry, I have zero tolerance for bullshit. And the funniest thing, simply answering it with something like "I forgot" probably would've been enough. Instead you started calling me names and talking about my mama. Sad.
If you grew a pair of balls and made it so the people who are annoyed by you can ignore you.
You bring this all on yourself. Either man up and fix it or quit whining.
Discussing? No. You're again twisting words to fit your inconvenient narrative.
Just one more thought on this. In no reality that I'm aware of do I owe you anything. I don't owe you reply to your questions, I don't owe you respect, I don't owe you a wet wipe to clean your ass.
I think you've been referred to somewhere here as the self-proclaimed overlord of this site (not an exact quote but close enough). I guess I missed the announcement from TER that you're the man in charge here and that we must all bend to your will.
You're almost as obsessed with Dior as you seem to be with me. I suggest you go see her and get Dior out of your system. I saw her, I liked her, she's nice and I probably won't be repeating with her.
I've never said you owe me anything. I certainly don't expect anything from you after not keeping your word you yourself gave.
I've never proclaimed to be an overlord of any site, that's a product of your buddy's vivid imagination.
I'm not obsessed with Dior at all. She's just another fish in the pond.
I'm obsessed with people trying to make girls seem better than they are,in reviews or forums. I'm obsessed with exposing every single review made by someone with a vested interest or advertising purpose. Get org people and advertisers off reviews and stop lying.
And I'm trying to right that.
It's very simple.
You just happen to be on the path of bullshit.
Every time I step in you I am reminded that bullshit is in my path, yes.
You have no concept that other people have different opinions than you do. I've seen girls who I did not like that others praised. I've seen girls who I really liked that others thought were meh. Everybody has his own perspective, preferences and opinions. Dior is young, cute and sweet. If you want to know more then please go see her for yourself and don't forget to take your measuring tape, calipers and scale.
I write reviews when I want to and not after every session. If you don't like my reviews then please (please, please, please) ignore them and find somebody who shares your preferences and who you can gain useful information from. I don't write my reviews for you, which I know must be a big surprise to you.
I've boosted toots and written reviews for girls from perhaps every K-org in the Bay Area. My favorite org is whichever org is hosting my CF at that moment. All orgs are ok in my book as they provide the girls I want to see.
I've provided resources to guys in this hobby, in the Bay Area, for a long time. I've had the time, interest, and willingness to share information freely to all. The hobby has changed so I don't do that nearly as much as I used to but I do enjoy the group active on Switter.
You behave as if everybody who disagrees with your manifesto is wrong. You should start your own web site and create the dystopia which you are trying to force on the rest of us. Let your loyal followers go with you and the rest of us will hold a drink in the air and say good bye.
I only wish I, as the originator of the thread, had moderator ability to remove off-topic comments, including my own.
I think my posts:reviews ratio is inching up but I'm still below 1:1. That's a goal that we would all like you to strive for, limit your posts here to the number of reviews you've submitted.
Let's both leave this thread alone, it's gotten far off the intended purpose and I am complicit in allowing you to drag it off course. Go post on the thread I've set aside for you and let's watch all your fans and followers join in over there.
If I'm smart this will be my last post to this thread but, alas, sometimes a weak moment gets me so we'll see how that goes.
If I learned anything from interacting with you is that your ego is almost as big as mine. How do you think I figure out your aliases? You go long enough on a back and forth with me, you expose patterns. You love your last word.
Again, it's quite simple. I don't want my own site or forum. I will be wherever advertisers and shills are, and I will correct them and point out their lies. The goal of shills and misleading org practices is to get more money for orgs and girls and in many cases, conceal idebtities so people cant look up old reviews.
And my goal is to get as truthful information about the product as possible,so customers can make informed decisions. I don't push anyone to follow what I say. They can make decisions for themselves.
Call it quality control. I will comment on suspicious, egregiously shill or generic reviews or conflict of interest reviews. Such as indoorsports review of Tiana and her org.
You can't and won't ever stop this. I'll do it on every forum I have access to. On other hand, if anyone wants to question validity and veracity of my reviews, I'm always happy to discuss them.
I'm also always happy to discuss girls themselves and their qualities, something you have no interest in doing, btw. You seemingly just want to advertise them.
I never said anyone has to agree on anything. I care about truthfulness and honesty in reviews. I know we don't have the same preferences. It has nothing to do with anything. Seanfinn and I have very different things we look for, girl-wise. But he appreciates the truth, and so do I. Funny how that works.
The funniest thing is I spent hours of my time deleting posts that were going at you that called you a shill. And now I get called names by you. Probably should've known better.
“You can’t and won’t ever stop this.”
That was amazing. Nobody tried to stop you. Many of us have suggested you stop yourself. But you immediately turn it around and paint yourself as the downtrodden hero.
Your post above should be set aside as an example to all of just how inflated an ego can get on a fuckboard.
I don’t know about anybody else. But, as far as I’ve seen, the one thing you have exceeded every other monger in is ego. A dubious honor, i know. But it’s likely the only one you’ll ever get.
I don't paint myself as a hero. I am committed to doing certain things, and it's up to others to decide whether it's good or bad.
I won't ever put money or pussy before fellow mongers though. I'll tell you that much.
Dude, you sound exactly like an alcoholic saying “i don’t have a drinking problem.”
I don't deny I have a big ego. In fact, I pretty much admitted it in my last post addressed to Mr advertiser.
So what exactly do I deny? I don't paint myself as a hero. Id like to believe I'm doing the right thing,but that's about it. I fight for what I think is right.
That's all. You can and do disagree with me, that's fine. I'm not going to change your opinion nor am I trying to.
Good day to you.
You’re only part way there. Admitting you have an ego is just a start. Lots of people have big egos. You go well beyond that.
That ego of yours is tied up inseparably with the idea that you are the one hero for all mongers. The only one who consistently takes the monger’s viewpoint.
This is the big reason you can’t let go of your protective little alias. Without it, you wouldn’t be able to wield your righteous sword against all of those evil orgs and your whole VIP monger conspiracy theory. Some people would actually be able to ignore your one voice of truth that cries out in the wilderness defending your idea of the monger’s best interest.
Like so many pathologies, the one who has it is the only one who can’t see it. Your hero complex is pretty clear to everyone else. Even people who know you from elsewhere have sent me friendly little messages to let me know that you mean well and that you feel like you’re the only one who stands up for the mongers.
-- Modified on 11/17/2020 6:43:59 PM
I never claimed I am the only one who stands up for mongers.
I've seen many mongers who wanted the truth and weren't scared shitless to call out shills fake reviews and poor advertising placements.
It really doesn't matter how many there are though. I'd want it to be many, but it doesn't affect my mission whatsoever. I will do my thing regardless. The more fake fables and advertising plots I am able to expose, the better.
The roaches who think they can fool mongers and abuse review systems and separate the said mongers from the money, should be punished.or at least shown their place and lane.
And if even one monger is helped, I consider it worthwhile.
I've already explained why I'm going to keep using this alias. I use rocket name on many forums groups and boards. I don't feel like repeating myself. You are welcome to think whatever you like if it helps you to sleep at night.
Again,I don't expect someone who says nonsense like "negative reviews of kgirls are useless" and someone who constantly chooses girls over monger bros, to ever understand.
I don't know why I'm even talking to you tbh, your constant inability to answer my questions and uncanny tendency to dodge any non-softballs are remarkable.
I don't know who sent you messages, and there aren't that many people who know me elsewhere aside from the donkey. But hey, I'm glad they think I mean well. However, if you haven't noticed, I generally don't really give a shit what people think of me.
There are a few people that I feel guilty about - those who got me into some private groups not knowing I will be embarking on such mission. To those people, if you're reading this, I apologize and I'm sorry. I'd hate for them to be held responsible for what I do.
Now, this is probably my final post to you in this topic. You guys talk to much about me, let's move on and talk about actual girl qualities, ie stuff that Maui doesn't like to talk about. Hehe.
It’s OK. Nobody expects you to admit it.
All of your protests above have been refuted before. No need to revisit.
Thanks for proving my point.
-- Modified on 11/18/2020 7:27:52 AM
I am anxiously awaiting your review if Dior, or any other girl for that matter. Your forum post to review ratio is abut 200:1 now I think.
First day reviews?
Ive tried toftts before and did first day mini reviews.
They didn't go well for most part,including some of the worst sessions I've ever had. Why do it again?
So, how chunky is Dior? Are we talking Maru big? Jiwoo/Harmony big boned? Cosmopolitan (Alpacas) size? Yuffie size? KGA Claire size?
The first several reviews, you mean up to the mediocre/bad reviews?
A lesson you've failed to learn is that, when you're already in a hole, to stop digging. You keep digging your hole deeper with every word you post. You'll be smart to just stop and move on.
I'm done, you should follow my lead.
Sorry bud, I am not in any hole. Don't transpose your situation onto mine,thank you very much.
This topic was about Dior, and why was the fact that she is a bit chubby neglected from your review. As well as why was the "pics accurate" box checked,
when she is far from chubby in her pics.
Ive failed to get an answer from you, so now I want to see an approximation of how chubby she is from another monger.
-- Modified on 11/16/2020 5:56:41 PM
The topic of this thread is FCG = BG, read the opening post. This thread is not about any girl. If you want to talk about Dior then, by all means, start a thread on her.
The hole I've been in this afternoon is one I needed to pull myself out of, not dig myself out of LOL
I thought this is a thread about fcg, who currently only has one girl, so I thought we are welcome to discuss her and her reviews here.
Twoon started discussing her and you carried on. And then I answered your own post.
But,sure - I agree that the thread itself wad not about Dior, it was about her org
Who currently has only one girl who is named Dior.
Mauibro,
Not to put words in Rocketbro's mouth but it's disingenuous of you not to share in your thread that you sessioned with Dior when she was a bunny 🐰 kgirl. You gave her a nice review. 😉. You're my monger bro and have cred with me. Just sayin'
What's the story on Taylor? There's a Taylor in Vegas but the glams don't match up.
-- Modified on 11/14/2020 8:23:40 PM
Ok, fine, but that's not the point of the thread I started and I'm not here recommending Dior either.
Dior wasn't with BG. I saw Dior at FCG.
Dior is FOB I believe and Taylor will be too, if she ever arrives.
My mistake. My apologies Mauibro; just trying to look out. I should pay better attention. D'oh
Taylor is working in the OC area. Told me she here till Xmas.
No the Taylor currently working in OC is a different girl.
Taylor currently in OC is not the same girl as the Taylor in the FirstClassKgirls pictures. Since you seem to know the OC Taylor, I assume you have not checked out the FirstClass pics because none of the pics are the same as used by OC Taylor, nor do they look they look like her.
Wonder how they come up with names for Kgirls. Can't think of any celebrity with the same name. The OC Taylor has worked in LA-MW for several years.
Sorry to jack this joke I've heard twice in two different channels.
But jeez, Kate is 6.4/6.2 looks/performance
http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/kate-6692403562-354759
And Dior is averaging 6.2/5.9 looks/performance
http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/dior-6692403562-354043
Sounds like there's been a bait and switch! And who but uncle rocket will say I told you so?