So much has changed.  You used to be able to tell the legends by an average rating between 8.6 and 8.8.  Now girls barely break 8.1.  I like tall, skinny, good ass, good gfe.  Like Rebecca, etc.  any thoughts or suggestions welcome

It does appear, to me anyway, that there are some unrighteous 7s being handed out to certain ladies that I consider to be far more than just "attractive." It's all subjective, I suppose, but I do sometimes wonder if there is an organized effort to lower the scores of certain popular k-girls. Especially when 7s, or lower, start appearing after a consistent series of 8s and 9s. This is pure speculation, of course, but it's an odd pattern to say the least.

we all have a certain "type" of look we like.  For me, it's tall and slender, so I will admit that I have given chubby girls a one-point lower score for looks on occasion.  

More like LA mongers are gradually stopping to prop every single girl like they used to do..  

Hard to say what "most" LA mongers do. I can only speak for myself. I don't review ladies unless they "wow" me. So my scores aren't inflated or an attempt to hype some girl who doesn't deserve it. They are, however, skewed by the fact that bad or mediocre experiences are not represented. It's pure guesswork on my part, but I think a lot of dudes take a similar approach. That may appear like some reviewers are trying to prop up every single girl, but it's definitely not the same thing. The worst you could call it is bias by omission.

Ive noticed many of a girls first couple reviews are 8 and 9.... I go see these girls and they are more like 7 and 8 and their D cup is almost always a small C.... We are surrounded by a lot of clueless graders. Maybe Ive been in the game way too long and im jaded. I will say that I dont mind the majority of guys seeking HYA'S when I love milfs like Yoco

going to say they do not get value for their money because they see so few providers that their expectations exceed reality, so maybe if seeing Kgirls creates a financial hardship, a cheaper hobby is in order until you make more money.  

This post had nothing to do with my post. Absolutely nothing.

So you don't review anyone who doesn't "wow" you ( and seem proud of it), and claim you only speak for yourself....  

Sure, I will be happy to help you make sense of it. Do you see these words in my first post? ... "This is pure speculation." ... And then do you see these words in my second post? ... "It's pure guesswork on my part."

would say if I brought up the other website, but at least you admitted you were banned nine times, but found a way to weasel you way back on, so good for you.  You may have been allowed back on, but the posts that got you banned are still gone, right?

when you have newbies that have only seen a few Kgirls creating profiles for new girls.  This is why when I review, I always correct any profile information that is wrong from the first reviewer within my own review.  We may not be able to change some things on the profile that is already there, but we can comment on what is right an what is wrong in our own reviews.  The items most often wrong are age range and, as you mentioned, cup size.  

Once again, it has nothing to do with my post and you just attempted to switch subject.

No, it's still unclear to me.

Well, you're right about one thing. I do care about providers' feelings, and that is indeed why I don't write negative reviews. If a session doesn't go well, or the girl isn't hot, I just don't return for another visit.

6 and below = waste of money
7 = More or less average. not repeatable
8 = ~Top 20%, attractive, repeatable
9 = ~Top 5%, ATF considerations
10 = ~Top 1% ATF

Sounds reasonable to me. Who is a "10" in your book? ... In recent times, I mean. Not 10 or 15 years ago

-- Modified on 1/5/2024 3:36:37 PM

in 2009. He has never given one for service, but that may be a function of the TER reviewing requirements where certain services (anal, double, or gang-bang) had to be provided in order to qualify for a 10.  

in 2009. He has never given one for service, but that may be a function of the TER reviewing requirements where certain services (anal, double, or gang-bang) had to be provided in order to qualify for a 10.  Out of my own 400 reviews, I have given a ten 20 times for looks and 11 times for service.  I think you will find most veteran Kgirl reviewers to be somewhat conservative when it comes to giving 10's.  

I gave two 10s for "looks" in TER.  One in '09 and another one in '13.   "10" supposed to represent "once in a life time".   So I bent the scoring criteria a bit for my two 10s.   As far as service is concerned I have yet to find that top 1% overwhelming experience therefore none got a "10" in that department.    I am more of a looks than service guy anyhow.

Yeah, "once in a lifetime" is an interesting concept. I can't think of an example today. But if I had to choose, looking back at k-girl history, I'd give it to Kami. Unfortunately no longer in the game, as far as I know. She was a 10 in my book in lots of different categories. Not necessarily TER categories, but my own, such as: Looks, Performance, Personality, Sense of Humor, Openness, Willingness to Experiment, and a very important category -- BBBJ Speed to Climax.

My four grading categories for service are Attitude, Enthusiasm, Skills and Menu.  Looks is a separate grade, but I consider face, body and boobs to come up with my final score.  A DDG girl will not get a 10 from me unless she has a body to match and great tits that look the correct size on her frame.  A petite girl with clown-tits will never get a 10 from me for looks.  Lol

Petite k-girl with clown tits sounds great to me! Who do you recommend? LOL!

If every teacher or professor cared about a students feeling after getting a bad grade, no failing or even C-/C grade would ever be given. So what the fuck is the point of grading things then?  

I answered you twice. You're just not paying attention.

No, I'm paying a lot of attention.

Dude, you're on a fuck board talking about the "integrity" of reviews. You don't see the absurdity in that?

No, I do not see any absurdity, at all.  

I just find it hilarious that you seem to think I have an obligation to write negative reviews. How about: You review your way, and I'll review my way? And if you don't like it, you can go jump in a lake of pussy juice. How 'bout that? LOL!

I never said you're obligated to do anything. You're somehow back to square one with this circular argument.  

about "integrity" after admitting you have been stealing access to TER reviews.  

OK, my man, I can see that I am stuck in the Team Quirky vortex here, where up is down and down is up. So I'm going to respond to one last point and then move on. You say I can't criticize the low scores assigned by other mongers if I don't give low scores myself? Well, I also don't play quarterback for the Rams, but I can (and do) criticize Stafford when he has a bad game. There's even a term for it: "Monday morning quarterback." In fact, I've never played QB at any level, and yet I can still criticize OBs all day long. I've also never written a movie, or a movie review, but I can criticize both of those, too. Welcome to America, brutha. We value free speech here. (Most of us, anyway.)

After this post I think it's safe to say you will never qualify to be one of Rocket's minions.  Lol

Rocket has minions? Frankly, I thought no one here liked, trusted o respected him. And IMO it’s a very well deserved status.

-- Modified on 1/22/2024 8:43:56 AM

aware of, but there are guys on the other site he posts on that are dumb as a rock.  I think there may be two "followers" currently, but I could be wrong.  They might just be messing with him.  It's a start, but we all know that sooner or later they will figure out he's leading them over a cliff with the org-bashing.  Lol

-- Modified on 1/22/2024 1:08:13 PM