This PSA is necessary since there are so many vocal people here who like to fuck without a cover and have been pushing the market in that direction.

If you're any of the below, let your booker/PO/girl know that you will prefer to see only see non-BBFS girls.
- You don't like playing in multiple previous guys cum cocktail
- You don't like the increased risk that comes from playing with girls who are continuously letting guys BBFS and CIP
- You don't like the increased risk from playing with girls who are now attracting the riskiest mongers who like BBFS and CIP.  Think about which mongers aren't scared of STDs and why.
- You take common sense precautions while playing this game
- You don't like the trend where kgirls are being pressured into going BBFS because they are told that if they don't, they will lose customers.
- You believe the medical community's consensus on what precautions to take
- You have equal or more common sense than even uneducated mongers and providers in 3rd world countries

I am going to ignore the responses that are going to show up attacking this PSA.  Has been discussed endlessly before and no point rehashing everything.  Anybody with common sense will see that there is nothing wrong in this PSA.  Let your booker/PO/girl know.

If it's been discussed endlessly before, why the need to discuss it again? Like you, I try to avoid openly bbfs ladies. That's our choice. Let the others make theirs and let the chips fall where they will. I just hate when threads become endless regurgitations of topics that have already been beaten by both sides ad infintum.

rehashing everything, why are you rehashing everything?  Kudos on the smooth transition from PSA to Beating a Dead Horse.   Lol

 
I get the feeling that even ONE person here who likes to fuck without a cover is too much for you.  Am I right?

Hmm. Tone? Judgementalism? Assumption? Defiling a corpse (see above)? And finally, egomaniacal self-centeredness?

There's one good point in here that is not often highlighted in the regurgitable matter:  

Let Your Booker/PO Know.  

Directly by words, or indirectly by turning down offered BBFS providers, whatever.  

They are who needs this message.

Here's a link to him "highlighting" exactly the same point on another thread just four days before starting this repetitive thread.  It's near the bottom of his post where he says "tell the booker . . . . . etc."  I believe there are a few other examples in the last couple of weeks, but I'm too lazy to look them up.  This one makes my point.  

for the answer of what the Booker said to him!

I don't mind the PSA. I really don't. Many people here don't like bbfs or have openly rallied against it before, me included.

 
But isn't it super obvious? The thing is and why I stopped the fight (aside from my little head also getting suckered in so I would be a hypocrite) is that guys see both cfs and bbfs girls. Bbfs guys won't magically stop. It is what it is. What is the booker gonna do? Tell girls to stop competing? Stop doing bbfs? Well shit still will get around if it's going around, because other people see both girls who fuck bare and covered.

I still want to know what the Booker or Bookers have said after getting the "stop the BBFS".
So, now I'm being repetitive.
Other people do it, so why can't I?

As I understand it the booker gets a higher fee for a bbfs booking so why would he/she care if a few outliers object? If the ladies are willing to do it, and the guys are willing/anxious to pay for it, it’s here to stay.

Exactly, there is high demand for BBFS and those kgirls who aren't open to BBFS, will only hinder the amount they can make. Many of the korgs in LA are charging extra for it. The girls and the PO make more, so why would they take it out?

No question bbfs is in big demand. Earlier this year I was seeing a gfe/non-bbfs provider at one of the Vegas KAgencies. She'd been around the west coast for a few years, and her best friend (a now retired KGirl) was one of my atfs who I'd seen many times. We hit it off and talked for an hour after my first visit was complete. She complained over and over that the bbfs ladies were always booked constantly, and she was lucky to get 2 or 3 dates a day while the bbfs ladies were getting 6 or more. She couldn't understand why the bbfs ladies would take the bbfs risk for an extra 80 after the house's cut. To me that indicated that the Vegas and west coast markets were predominantly bbfs and I'd either have to live with it or have very few choices among the KGirls.

Exactly, RH.

 
Not to mention there are a lot of kgirls who used to do bbfs and then switch to cfs. And vice versa. Then they go to trips to east coast and only do cfs. Then come back here and go back to BB.

 
There's a great chance even if you only do cfs and take great precautions, you still may catch something.  

 
There really isn't a blanket statement or action that can magically remove this risk.

 
Luke I've said, back when bbfs was a secret menu item, these PSAs would be helpful. I remember coming back from a long hiatus to the mongering scene and not understanding the "new PSE" moniker. I was like why are girls dead fish when they advertise pse but they wanna fuck bare.  

Now at a point where girls upcharge or openly include it, the mongers have a full picture of safety. Up to them to make a decision.

All these responses, which I appreciate, are off the mark, IMO!
This was an oft repeated question to the OP and kind of a dig at him!
Also, because he never answered the question from the first time it was asked, and it was in a few threads and quite a few posts!

 
Rocket, my post was in response to you saying, "what is the Booker gonna do" and it just hit me to ask one more time!
I did a post just up above when CDL's 'News flash' post pointed out that the OP keeps saying "tell the Booker".

 

BTW, I agree with all you've said.

I doubt that the booker responded to him. He was probably too busy booking bbfs KGirls to have time to respond to the complaints of one outlier who might book a session a month.

there is no such things as no bbfs. Just cause you get a booker to promise they don't offer it, you think their girls didn't offer it at the last city they were at?  You think a booker is turning away a star earner because she gave bbfs in vegas and some guy in va don't like it?

just assume every pro offered bbfs at her last tour stop, cause you have no way to have trustworthy proof that they didn't.

This is so funny to me. Like what are you going to do about it, leave a bunch of bad yelp reviews?

Unless you are 1 of the parties, what 2 consenting adults do with their bodies is none of your business. Don't like it? Too bad. Stay home and jack off. Any of course of action is just hater shit.