Write Review
2,075,543 Total Reviews 3,786 New Reviews
13,670 Users Online

K-girls

Multiple reviews on one girl not allowed?
sunnyday1 171 Reviews 717 reads
posted

OK, my second review of Blue was unapproved because I had reviewed her before.

But it was no problem when I reviewed Siena THREE TIMES.

WTF?

And no, I am not doing this for VIP time, I already have about a year of VIP days at this point and I expect that number to grow with my frequency of visits. Not doing this for VIP time, doing this for my fellow kgirl lovers.

What gives?

coeur-de-lion75 reads

the mods for an explanation.  Click the "Help" tab, then the "Contact US" Tab, then "Review Questions" and fill our the form.  Ask what is different about your second review of Blue compared to the three reviews of Siena, because on the surface, its seems like an inconsistency.  

 
My own guess is that  you had two or more months in between your prior reviews of Siena, and it looks like about 30 days between your first and second reviews of Blue. Usually, they require a little more time to allow for changes in her looks or service.  The narrative should show a little different content on subsequent reviews of the same girl.  If she has changed or expanded her menu, or the service was a lot better or worse than last time, these are the types of things that properly update a prior review.  If she just did everything the same, there is no point in reviewing her again, but if there have been significant changes, whether for better or worse, those warrant a followup review, and it should be allowed.  That's why I think you need to ask.  

ReplyQuoteReport
team_rocket_qwerty86 reads

In ways ter approves/rejects same girl reviews. I've seen multiple views of same girl by same monger like a month apart. This whole you cannot have multiple reviews thing is enforced very arbitrarily, it appears. And from what I understand, it's mostly to curb vip extenders/shills...but such reviews still go through. Go figure.

ReplyQuoteReport
36363jensen79 reads

Of Siena were all at least 3 months apart while the first review of Blue was in November. FYI, of course you are not doing this for VIP as additional reviews for the same girl are not VIP eligible.

 
I'm pretty sure that if you check the policies on additional reviews you'll see they are supposed to be at least 3 months separation and something new added to the event that was not reported in the prior review(s).

 
I suspect that is the source of the non-approval.

[Edit -- just looked at the review guidelines and they don't mention anything about a 3 month period between initial review and update review. Thought I had seen that but perhaps just confused it with the 3 month period for submitting a review of a session.]

-- Modified on 12/21/2020 12:52:11 PM

ReplyQuoteReport
coeur-de-lion94 reads

If looks or service have changed, then I thing a followup review is warranted.  If she is exactly the same as the last review, then its not justified.  If I review any  girl a second time, its because something was a little different.  For looks it could be a new tits, or some other cosmetic procedure, more attractive hairstyle, lost a few pounds, etc. For service, if her menu has changed to add or take things off that I experienced before, of if the passage of time has made her a better provide from all the additional experience she has, then I can justify a second review for those reasons as well.  

 
I just wish reviewers would stop inflating scores for BBFS.  It does nothing for either the monger community or the girl.  She will continue to be lazy if she is getting good scores merely for going bare, and her looks do not jump from an 8 to a 10 just because she is going bare, yet this is what we have to contend with from reviewers that only judge a Kgirl on whether or not she goes bare.  Removing a condom is not a skill that deserves a score of any kind.

ReplyQuoteReport
useyrhead99 reads

It’s been a while since I’ve seen it. But it is a rather common experience that a girl who offers anal doesn’t just get a better service score. She tends to get better scores across the board.  

 
I’ve forgotten the name of one of these girls (cause I suck at remembering names), but I think it was Cemi or something like that.  I walked in and walked right out. Totally didn’t deserve the appearance ratings she got.  

 
So, yeah. I wish reviewers didn’t get all misty eyed over certain services. But I suspect that subjectivity is something we are all guilty of at some point or another.  

 
I remember one girl that I just loved. When I first met her she was so slim and had such a perfectly flat tummy that my dick made a bump in her tummy when I thrusted. I was one of the few that graded her face as an 8. I guess it was just too hard (pardon the pun) to be completely objective about her overall looks after having such a great time with her.  

 
Even though I think it is worth offering friendly support to others to help reach that goal, I really don’t think we’ll ever be able to have anything close to a significant percentage of truly accurate and objective reviews. Of course, the R-boy virus will consider those fighting words.  

 
Of course, that’s just my opinion. Any and all are free to disagree. And we know one guy who will actually take offense, I suppose. Oh well.

ReplyQuoteReport
36363jensen89 reads

Trying to have a good baseline on just how good she might be and what the experience should be rated is one reason why I tend to think a review after just one session is not a great plan.

 
However, many do like the idea of one and done so they really have no choice.

 
I just find it easier these days to just not bother reviewing.

ReplyQuoteReport
Twoontuesday112 reads

Hey Sunnybro,

 

My take is that TER doesn't want you to do multiple Reviews of the same RA.

 
I was able to do multiples on Zuri and Jesi but my Bora repeats have been disallowed.

 
It's a TER thing.  Kinda like the definition of shilling.

 

Just my opinion.

ReplyQuoteReport
36363jensen85 reads

TER supports additional reviews. They need to be an update on the prior session though. Something of merit should have changed and reviews are not the mechanism for (TER) shilling -- Friday posts are ;-)

 
Either the admin didn't see much added in the update for Blue or some other thing. Perhaps multiple admins not having a common understanding of the rules or standard of application. I don't think the guideline rules have been updated by the new management but suspect new staff is in place so....

ReplyQuoteReport
Twoontuesday93 reads

Thank you brother for the clarification.

ReplyQuoteReport
Floorhump42296 reads

I agree that the inconsistency in approval is due to the staff. I know of at least one repeat review where it's literally just a copy of the first one. The admins clearly didn't bother to read the first review before approving the second.

ReplyQuoteReport
Post Reply Back To Forum
Register Now!