On the way home from a 3rd session with a Kgirl I recently added on my rotation list, I got to thinking how I could have reviewed her better if I waited until after 2 or 3 sessions.  
I've done that on some of my reviews, but most are after first impressions.
Some are pretty right on after the first meeting, but the reviews after a few sessions are, IMO, not bad and really descriptive, both looks & service.

 

And this would be in the Mongers hands, if the new (to you) girl is a one 'n' done then do a review.
If she will be a repeat and, in your rotation, it might be better to see her a few times and then do the review.

 
So, what do you Mongers think about when you meet a Kgirl that will be going on your rotation, and you determined this in the middle of the session, about putting in a few sessions before you review her?

Years ago I had issues with other mongers who tried to dox me and/or set me up to have encounters with LE or others that would result in unpleasant outcomes. It turns out that if you make life unpleasant online for trolls in a monger forum there can be very unpleasant outcomes in the real world. Before I knew that I was being set up I had a couple of close calls. Fortunately for me, they thought another monger was me and they doxed him. Yeah, not a great result for the other guy, I know.

Because of that I now always very carefully protect my anonymity.  

If I meet a girl I’m considering repeating with, I generally do not write a review. Back when I was repeating with one particular girl I went ahead and reviewed her. Because her front door and all access was so exposed I was convinced there could not be an issue. All I had to do was wear a mask and hat to keep people from getting usable pictures.

Net is that I mostly don’t write reviews anymore. It’s just too hard for me to get back to being as trusting and naive as I used to be. Though I am delighted for those who have not had any issues. And I do believe in the value of reviews.  

Part of my problem has been that I have gotten very lucky and quite a few girls have volunteered extra services and then sternly told me “no reviews”. So, mix that in with the fact that over the years I ended up meeting a number of girls who subsequently went UTR only (so no reviews ever), and my paranoia from a number of incidents in the past and you have an almost complete absence of reviews from me over the past several years.

I do agree that if you're seeing someone regularly the sessions seem to be a bit different than both the first time and generally from sessions of the "novelty of a new girl" type so the review after a few sessions will offer insights that were not obvious in the first session.

 
I also think a lot depends on what you're trying to do with the review. I think the general presumption here is that the review really should be about getting information out in a timely manner so others can take action based on that information. That does argue for first session reviews, particularly in the case of a new provider that doesn't have many/any reviews. But for local providers that will be around for a while I think a delay is not really causing much issue as the rust to get that information and see the lady is largely gone. Seeing her this week or next week, or even next month, is not really a bit deal.

 
A last thought, since TER allows follow up reviews, you could also write up the review for the first session, and then do a follow up after a few more sessions.

 
I can say I have done as you say, where I specifically didn't write a review for the first session. Obviously I was planning on seeing the lady again but felt I could not give an accurate assessment of the person and the sessions one should expect. Generally there was some type of ill defined awkwardness that didn't seem really due to the provider. Clearly I enjoyed the session enough to want to repeat. In every case I did find the second and later sessions were very good and the type of experience I was expecting when I initially booked.

but I state in the review that the review is a composite experience from two different sessions.  I my experience, the second session is often the best you will get from some providers, so reviewing ONLY the second session can potentially mislead some guys who are seeing her for the first time. About a third of the Kgirls I see are a little shy on the first session but I can't remember ever having a Kgirl be shy on the second session.  Admitting that it's a composite review provides full disclosure and won't inadvertently mislead guys into thinking that will get what you got on the second session on their first session.  Just something to think about.

Most mongers don't repeat past the first session if they deemed the session to be even average, much less if it was weak.

 
So a review after the first session would capture the initial assessment, which is something helpful to others who also will see a girl for the first time. Most people read reviews of girls who they've yet to see.

 
I also do find that in more cases than not, further sessions improve experience. However, something to understand is again, a monger who didn't have a great session is unlikely to repeat again. There were a few girls I liked who required some time to gel or a specific approach. The only reason I've stuck with them is because they offered good service regardless. Most mongers aren't as patient. So when I review a girl I've seen a few times and who requires several sessions to warm up, I always warn others. And out of those people, maybe 5% actually went on to see the girl. Many people want instant gratification in this biz, not play games they can play at a bar.  

 
Most people don't want to spend a G on mediocre sessions in order to potentially improve them by thee fifth session. They'd just rather spend that $ on three good sessions. And I can't blame them.

 
So overall - I'd say even if you seen a girl a ton, I'd cater and tailor my review as per first session. I'd obviously would say that I've had many sessions, and clarify what things might open up, but I'd keep the review as what you'd expect on a first session. As to not set expectations that are unreachable on the first date.

that the session would get better because our comfort level would improve.
Or, like the only thing that drew me in was age and looks.
As an example, what I'm talking about is more of a better description of a skill set, BBBJ, because for whatever reason I just missed something or forgot it.
Sometimes the session goes really fast.

 
I always try to put the info in a review that it's a composite review.

I just feel if you're doing a review of a girl after a few sessions, you take the composite of all those sessions and it may not align with a true first time experience. Some girls are shy or apprehensive or careful the first time before they get to know you, etc.

 
I think most people read reviews of only girls theyre going to see for the first time. So I feel like owing them a  
 review of how it's gonna be the first time, not how it could be.

As far as skillset, I guess it doesn't happen much to me because skillset is one of the most important things to me. I may forget boob size or whether they were natty or not especially if they were well made.  But I'll neve forget a good throat doctor. Lol.

If I say it's a composite or I've seen this Kgirl a few times, you'd think the person reading could figure out that some things in the review might not happen either to them or easily for them.
Just that it's possible.
And just because my first session goes a certain way doesn't guarantee that they will get the same session.
I just put my experience and observations in the review.
It's there for the info, it's not a guide or a how-to instruction book.
Although, if the person is good at picking up on things, reading between the lines or understanding how the encounter went, they could get a good and helpful picture of what to do when they're up at bat!

writing a composite review as long as the reviewer discloses it.  I agree that a review should give an accurate account of a "first experience" with a new girl. I have done this a FEW times, usually because a girl was very shy and took half the session to get comfortable with me. I will wait and write the review after seeing her again within a week, because I also think it's important to do this quickly after the first review before she starts to make any changes in her session style.  I often come off inadvertently as intimidating to FOTB girls, so I do the second session to give them a chance to show their stuff before writing the review, but I will always say it's a composite of two visits a few days or a week apart.  

 
If I review a girl a second time well past the first review, it will be because something has changed, for better or worse, in her menu, appearance, performance or attitude.  I think there are no more than 15 girls I have reviewed more than once out of 400 reviews.  

Pretty much agree with all of that.

 
For me the only real value for a first session review, written without any undue delay, is either when the review is for a touring girl that will be gone soon and the reviewer thinks she was exceptional and that others will agree and be sad to have missed their opportunity or if there is something bad that others really need to know about.

 
Otherwise, I really don't see much way of telling if the after the first session review or the composite review of two or several session would be most valuable for me. I think your point about your experience not being some guarantee of a similar session it spot on.

Years ago I was driving back home from a session and there was a van in front of me with vanity plate "4KGirIs". I posted on the board that I might have just seen a taxi service for Korean escorts. This was so long ago, it might have been on the LA board with no Kgirl board at the time. Somebody didn't see the humor and chided me for a potentially dangerous post.

This. Getting into the YMMV area with stuff you couldn't get on the first visit has to be clearly stated as something that a repeat got you. I always emphasize service that is the result of repeat-visit goodwill.  
 
But mostly: I try to get to my review of somebody who hasn't been reviewed, or not lately, as soon as possible because she needs the list bump! Don't wait, submit another review if things get seriously better.

Very cool to run into that!
Did you check out the person driving?
I probably would do it on the sly.

 
I guess some people can't pick up on anything funny, no sense of humor!

I didn't see the driver and misremembered the plate (it was girlz not girls)

 
https://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/los-angeles-1/4kgirlz----did-i-come-across-their-shuttle-bus-263536?frmSearch=1#263536

I dont really see why reviews written for other mongers (I hope we agree that reviews written for girls adveerisemt or biz are against TER ToS)

need to have any amount of "between the lines" reading. I view the necessity of putting anything that has to be read between the lines in the same bucket as euphemisms. It doesn't help mongers.

 
So again, personally I think I owe a review of how a first session might go. If you are getting ymmv stuff after five sessions I think it's useful to make it as clear as possible. You may argue that it goes without saying someone seeing a girl for 30 hours will know his way around her far more than a guy who was with her for one hour. For most though, they wanna know what cna be achieved from a new customer perspective in an hour.  

 
One example is dfk. For a lot of people, lack of dfk is a big deal. And some girls won't dfk until you're a repeat customer. We aren't talking about extreme ymmv here such as Greek or some kinky sm stuff.