Hi--
I have managed to garner some references from non-K-girl independents & was wondering if the bookers find these acceptable, or if they're only looking for refs from within their own circles here in LA.

If you're looking at my reviews, yes, I have seen plenty of K-girls in the past, but they are all either moved or retired, so they are no longer valid options.

Thanks

My intro to the K-girl scene was the references from 2 C-girls and a T-girl. Not certain which 2 got me in the door. The two C-girls were independents.

the standard modus operandi is two current K-dolls from the popular sites like LAKStyleblog.com, however, depending on the girls & the relationships bookers they may have alternative method of screening that. Include references from reputable independents & other Asians. It is when K-bookers go outside the standard system that problems especially with predatory clients begin,

 It's  worth noting that some K-bookers do not cooperate with one another and won't accept each other's references.  

 

...has a recent review.  Also, phone no. 2 for Nicole (old) is still active;  Davi was reviewed a few days ago and that number is in her profile.  Her booker may be able to help you.

Thank you--good advice!

END OF MESSAGE

I wish it was good advise but the source is a delinquent impostor  who the least knowledgable on the LA K-doll scene most unqualified to discuss or give advice about it.The links unmask him & show his true identity.  

Your initial assertion that your references are outdated is most likely correct but the  references your accumulated from independents can be handy . Bookers use client's phone number to identify & determine of they are safe.  

Youn saw Love Km in 2009 the  year she stopped work & did not return until December 2012 at which time she worked with a new now retired booker. He current booker has been booking for only 2 years.  

Yes you saw "Old" Nicole but she too is long gone & while agencies maintain  
tel # bookers change . Davi is working in Seattle & not LA.  

My initial advice stands . Good luck.

 

So is this really why you have been a pissy little bitch for all these years?
Posted 1/10/2014 at 3:25:25 PM
GaGambler
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion_boards/viewmsg.asp?MessageID=221832&boardID=39&page=1#221832

 
"It's against TER discussion board guidelines to make posts which are rude, name-calling or slanderous. .........bullies thought it would be a good idea to start calling all providers "hookers" because they wanted to "keep it real."  Yet they still called guys "hobbyists" until I called them out."  
BigPapasan Posted 9/19/2013 at 1:54:26 PM  
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion_boards/viewmsg.asp?MessageID=298665&boardID=1&page=1#298665  
 
 But facts can be a bitch when they come home to stew you.  
 
1. 'Or they could object to hookers who fuck up to 11 guys a day......being called "dolls" and "divas." '  
BigPapasan Posted 8/25/2013 at 5:32:21 PM  
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion_boards/viewmsg.asp?MessageID=1407&boardID=113&page=#1407  
 
 
2. " I'll stop saying K-ho when I no longer see Johns saying K-doll."  
 
BigPapasan, Posted 7/13/2012 at 8:00:18 PM  
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion_boards/viewmsg.asp?MessageID=282310&boardID=1&page=#282310  
 
3. The K-bookers and K-hoes are laughing their asses off at you two. "  
 
 BigPapasan Posted 7/8/2012 at 1:39:38 PM  
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion_boards/viewmsg.asp?MessageID=282121&boardID=1&page=#282121  
 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------  
4 ."K-booker" - a euphemism for panderer, procurer or pimp..."  
 
BigPapasan Posted 7/13/2012 at 1:58:13 PM  
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion_boards/viewmsg.asp?MessageID=282297&boardID=1&page=#282297