I review most Kgirls who I find hot and engaging. I as a rule do not bash non-hot Kgirls who are ok, sweet, and honest.  

To date, 75% of Kgirls fall into my hot category and they get a review. The other 25% remain, well, anonymous.  “If you can’t say anything nice, then don’t say anything at all”.  

So, I don’t post 1, 2, 3, 4 , 5 and 6’s.  

Am I doing a disservice to my ilk?   Should I bash those nice Kgirls who aren’t hot and meeting my level of dick hardness?  

I say no.  If I review a Kgirl she will be at my level of hotness.  

CDL, what do you think?  

Outside a rip off, if the Kgirl is working and honest, if she delivers but isn’t my definition of “hot”, I’m not going to bash them.  

Sorry.  I’m sure Rocket is going to go crazy on me. Bring it on.

an honest review, no need to bash anyone.
Unless they need bashing!
But all reviews are needed to let the Mongers glean whatever information they can to evaluate the Kgirl for a TDL spot or a DNS tag.

I don't really care how someone decides what they will or will not review -- as long as they are trying to be honest in their assessment and are consistent in their application of their standards.  

 
I really don't rely on reviews any longer myself. I certainly don't think anyone owes it to me to write a review, so naturally don't see that some obligation exists for anyone to write a reviews of any type.  

 
When I was using reviews my goal was always to find someone I wanted to see, not merely find someone I might not want to see. So, sure, bad reviews might make me quickly pass over the profile that was never what I was looking for in reviews.

First and foremost, whether you decide to write reviews and what kind of reviews they end up being is up to you.  Ignore/block anyone else that says otherwise.  It could be all about the good ones, or only about the bad ones, or a mix of both.  However, I'm not sure why you would automatically attribute reviews that don't meet your criteria of "hot and engaging" as bashing.  It isn't and shouldn't be.  From my point of view, a less than flattering review is as informative as one that highly praises a girl as long as it's clearly not a shill.  What you found lacking or excessive may satisfy another monger's preference.  

It boils down to what you want to accomplish by posting a review: Is it to bring exposure on a girl you like, thereby keeping her here longer with consistent and continued patronage?  Is it to warn others about disingenuous pictures or other aspect of her physical appearance?  Or to dissuade others from seeing her due to subpar performance/service?  A review can accomplish all this and more.  It's a tool; one in which you decide the effect it will have.  But, I think it helps us all here when reviews are honest, genuine, and sincere.  I consider these types of reviews to be fundamental pieces of a puzzle.  When enough pieces are gathered (this threshold is dependent on the quality/quantity of the reviews and your own self-imposed point at which you are sufficiently convinced to go see her), you can construct and form expectations that, as much as possible, closely match reality given the available reviews.   When reviews contradict, and they will, I use it weed out shills, unreliable reviewers, and reviewers that closely match my own preference.

In the end, as long as it's your honest take on the session, post whatever review you want IMHO.

I won’t put a negative review up if she just seems off but if they aren’t anything like their pictures or description and the  if services stink ,I feel it’s for us  to review. Nothing is worse than seeing a girl with 3 good to great reviews and find she’s a fake. That’s my hard earned $$ going down the drain. What’s the point of coming on this site if you’re not gonna warn someone that there’s a fraud out there.

I don't review girls who fall below 8 in looks or 6 in service. Why? Because many years ago I gave a mildly negative review to an independent lady, and she seemed genuinely hurt by it. She emailed me afterward saying it made her cry. Ever since then, I have only reviewed providers that I enjoyed spending time with. This hobby is supposed to be fun. And that wasn't fun.

I look at reviews and authors of the reviews as a collective piece of information.  I have seen really bad reviews from reviewers with no history of seeing the same Kgirls I have seen.  Most informative is when a reviewer has seen the same Kgirls I have seen over the years.  Their reviews are more legitimate.  

I have seen Kgirls reviewed by legit reviewers and the Kgirl just doesn’t measure up.  I recently saw a Kgirl with 7-8’s but I found her meh.  Why?   Well, she reminded me looks wise of someone I didn’t particularly like IRL.  It’s not the Kgirl’s fault she had an appearance of someone I knew IRL, because perhaps if I didn’t have that experience IRL I would have been more attracted to her.  

Service wise, I tend to rate Kgirls who are enthusiastic and engaged.  I love mutual interaction.  If the  kgirl with good reviews looks hot but isn’t engaging, then I move on.  No review.  I figure our chemistry wasn’t right, etc etc.  I mean I am not 40 year old hard body so if the Kgirl isn’t up to acting the part, I can understand her feelings.  

To date, I review Kgirls I like to at least a 7 level.  Below7?  Naw.   Live learn and move ahead to fuck another day.  

I use the TER to match reviewers to my preference of Kgirl.  It has worked out fairly well.  

I appreciate the comments.