Babies being an overused and relatively recent marketing ploy, IMO!

 
I've been having different and interesting type of fun with true Babies [27 'n' down*] submissive and bring your own service K&J girls. No real routine and NOT service queens, so to me, they are like civie hook ups [just have to pay to get in the door, as opposed to just paying over and over with non working girls^^]. 

 
So, bring your own/you run the show sessions which were real nice. The sex, chemistry and comfort level, for both parties, have made for some of the best sessions and pretty memorable too!

 
Anyone else having good sessions with these HYA, as they are called by the HYA hunters.
The hunters are looks over service guys, but I've found for me, a good level of service.

 
*This is the consensus with guys in the know that post it on a couple of forums, to me they look late 27 to 31,
bottom line they are young.

When it first started in LA it was applied accordingly more or less and you could see which one of the girls who were all somehow listed in early 20s was actually on the younger side.

 
Obviously it didn't last long. Now everyone and their momma is a "baby". Like you said it's a stupid marketing ploy. I've seen it applied liberally. We had one girl from here go to LA and rebrand as Baby Pinky. I was like I like her she is fun, several good sessions...but people will be severely disappointed if they expect a "baby". Thankfully either po or she herself read the feedback and the baby moniker was removed for her.  

 

 
As far as actual HYAs... I am often curious and so I do try if they're not difficult to book (in today's climate they certainly are and I mostly don't bother).

I think there is a common misconception out there that service lovers such as myself get disappointed by hyas, but in fact that's not the case. I generally expect rudimentary service and mediocre skills from lookers and hyas. That doesnt mean I wont give them a grade they deserve in those categories (obviously a service queen is going to have much harder grade than bring your own service girls) but generally my expectations are pretty low there and there is no expectation mismatch.

 
Whereas, if I go to a supposed service milf who isn't a lookerand I'm expecting service, but she is just a milf without looks or service... Now that is disappointing because now there's nothing that interests me.

and I don't think the term HYA was in much use at the time but yes, I'm in agreement with you. Zuzu, Annabelle and Biju are three from the past that stand out, still, in my mind. All young, none over 25 and two closer to 21 than 25. Great sessions, fun interactions, fresh and innocent feel to everything, even when it was hot and steamy.

 
But that was then, 10+ years back, and while those were the standouts for me a much larger percentage of the girls coming though fit the HYA description so "hunting" was hardly much effort.

I’ve always enjoyed sessions with young and relatively inexperienced kgirls; some were assigned baby names and some not! I still love that unspoiled almost girlfriend experience with a true “new girl”. I remember visiting a new girl who was a friend of one of my regulars who came over to try the lifestyle! I booked her first session! We hit it off, and I ate her like no tomorrow! I had her worshipping me by the end of the session! Unfortunately I think her other experiences were not as good, and she lasted a week. That was regrettable!

Although the name is overused, I love finding the true “babies” in the group! I’m seeing one tomorrow morning, although I don’t know how much of a baby she is since she worked under a different name in OC before this stop in LA! I think this baby may be young, but she could still have 4-5 years under her belt! Is she really a “baby”? I’ll report back tomorrow!