K-girls

How many new faces (and bodies) are people seeing.
36363jensen 4 Reviews 1908 reads
posted
1 / 21

From what I seen in the DMV it looks like all the K-Girls are known repeats rather than what we saw pre-COVID and (perhaps a bit pre-FOSTA).

 
I get the impression that this is perhaps true everywhere. Is that a correct impression?

Floorhump422 25 Reviews 84 reads
posted
2 / 21

My impression has been that variety in the DMV was greater throughout 2020-late 2021 than it's been since late 2021. Wonder why, since covid restrictions have eased. The weather is likely a factor. I think most people are in agreement that the covid environment doesn't compare to that pre-covid, but the situation within covid hasn't really been discussed (2020-2022).

badger48 125 Reviews 91 reads
posted
3 / 21

There's a lot of chatter about repeats/rebrands and I've run into a couple of them.

 
The girls are also using multiple bookers and using different names with each org.

 
You need a score card!

useyrhead 4 Reviews 283 reads
posted
4 / 21

From what I’ve heard, most Koreans are not traveling. I haven’t looked at the actual restrictions. But everyone I know living in Korea or who has family and friends there is looking forward to when it is possible to travel.

 
I’d say we’re going to see mostly repeats until the travel restrictions and people’s fears about it ease up considerably.

RegencyHobbyist 109 Reviews 81 reads
posted
5 / 21

Since the onset of COVID all we’ve seen in Vegas is second and third tier LA and west coast KGirls and some new FOB girls. Not the best quality service in my opinion.

36363jensen 4 Reviews 85 reads
posted
6 / 21

Are these Korean or Japanese?

 
From what I've seen it seem that the K-Girls are all those living in the USA, and they have been for a significant time. I have seen some short-term Japanese, who have been younger, showing up at one Agency here (Chinese). If you are seeing fresh, hopefully younger, K-Girls showing up perhaps that is a sign more are starting to travel.

 
As you note, they are via LA/other west coast points so surprised the LA, particularly, guys have not been saying much about new faces (regardless of quality).

coeur-de-lion 400 Reviews 93 reads
posted
7 / 21

Girls from SoCal and NorCal used to find Vegas attractive when the rates in NorCal were $220 and SoCal was $250-260.  Vegas was $300, but the Vegas org cut was still only $100, like in SoCal (NorCal was $70), so going to Vegas was worth an extra $40-50 PER HOUR.  Now that the rates in SoCal have caught up to $300 (with a few top girls at $320-350), there is no advantage to the top tier girls going to Vegas for three weeks at a time to work.  They can do just as well in SoCal.  If the Vegas orgs raised their rates to $350, and the girl netted $250, you would again get some great talent touring there from California. It depends on whether the customer base there is willing to pay more for better talent.  It's not personal, it's just business.  At least that's what the ladies are saying.

team_rocket_qwerty 35 Reviews 87 reads
posted
8 / 21

I don't envy you LA folks. It seems like it's a zoo in terms of rebrands and multiple bookers for the same girls. Not to mention higher rates...

team_rocket_qwerty 35 Reviews 72 reads
posted
9 / 21

There have been a lot more new faces lately here,especially over last let's say three months.

 
With that said, the quality is down imo compared to precovid. There are barely any new service girls in the mold who I really like. Most of existing ones are vets with like 2-3 years experience at minimum.

 
Even the eye candy girls who are touted as or supposed to be young and/or good looking... I'm not too impressed by. But again, whole I dont have high expectations or need for looks, I'm nonetheless pretty picky face-wise as to what a beautiful face looks like.

RegencyHobbyist 109 Reviews 99 reads
posted
10 / 21

Rates in Vegas also seem to be on the rise. In 2021 many if not most of the KGirls added a $40 upcharge for msog, and one smaller Agency raised its rate to $320. Wouldn't be surprised to see VAC and LTLV raise their basic rates in the near future.

coeur-de-lion 400 Reviews 83 reads
posted
11 / 21

as far as attracting top girls, it will depend on whether the increase all goes to the girls, and even if it did, rates would still need to move up a little more to get them to come (so you can cum - lol).  They lose a whole day of income ($1000-1600, plus tips), traveling in EACH direction from anywhere in California, so at $20/hr more, it's still little more than a push, moneywise, for a 3-week stint.   Whereas, a girl working in LA can finish at 7:00 pm, and be in OC by 10:00p to start the next morning at 10:00a.  There's virtually no lost time changing locations between LA, OC, and SD.  It's pure economics for these girls.  

 
It might work better for the orgs if they could price the girls individually rather than the same rate for everyone on their website.  Some agencies have done this in the past with reasonable (but not total) success with the right girls.  The orgs would have to be willing to let the girls use their existing names so they can trade off of their history and reputation, which many in the past have not wanted to do.  I understand this thinking with second tier girls, but it's a little different with the top girls.  Not all basketball players on a roster get the same pay, so there no reason all Kgirls on a roster need to get the same pay.  Doing this would also encourage the girls to up their game if they want to get some of the action at the higher rates.  There may be potential legends among second tier girls that currently have no incentive to give 100%, but with a chance to charge more for better service, they would be properly incentivized.  

team_rocket_qwerty 35 Reviews 71 reads
posted
12 / 21

There is no real good reason why a superstar who works super hard should be getting same pay as a rookie who is half assing it.  

 
What I'm afraid of though, is that instead of differentiation of pricing, the price floor will rise instead.

badger48 125 Reviews 88 reads
posted
13 / 21

There have been some new faces, just not a lot!

 

With some of them, after they are seen, the Monger reports, "hey she turned out to be so & so!

 
It's not easy with the unreliable pics!

RegencyHobbyist 109 Reviews 86 reads
posted
14 / 21

Historically VAC has let the top tier touring girls keep their names (Gloria, Amanda, Megan, Angela, Quinn, Stella) so that’s not an issue.  As to individual pricing I’m good with that. Since COVID Vegas KGirls have been a crapshoot. I’d love to have some guaranteed great dates to look forward to.

Ericabc 16 Reviews 81 reads
posted
15 / 21

To each their own.  I am all about looks, since I can’t get hard or cum from service oriented girls I seem so far.  I get to make my own service with eye candies.

coeur-de-lion 400 Reviews 75 reads
posted
16 / 21

in SoCal, where their websites have individual price points set by the girls based on how busy they are.  Obviously, the Kgirls want to charge as much as their own customers are willing to pay.  I don't think it will be long before this becomes the norm and you will see it spread throughout the country.   There are customers for Cadillacs and customers for Chevy's, so I don't see anything wrong with individual pricing.   Many of the smarter girls are realizing that when they have a good brand with a good reputation, they can exploit it.  Some years back, the bookers insisted on the girls switching names when they toured, and that now seems to be an unpopular practice with the top girls.  Multiple names often get consolidated into one profile on TER, anyway, when sharp-eyed reviewers spot girls they know using different names.  

 
You mentioned Quinn.  When she contracted to go to Vegas under this same name, the booker was able to fully book her for the first four days based strictly on her SoCal reviews.  Several locals became regulars while she was there.

useyrhead 4 Reviews 76 reads
posted
17 / 21

This used to be the territory of the girls who had gone independent or the occasional senior girl in a house. At least in my experience.  

 
That said, it’s my preference to avoid doing market research for the orgs here in a monger forum. So I’ll leave it to the girls and the orgs to figure out.

Rickjames_ 45 Reviews 126 reads
posted
18 / 21

I don’t get it when popular RAs change names when in a different city. A popular provider has built a brand. One that horny mongers in a different city may be eying in hops to bang when she tours. Gia of GFEI used to be Ara in SoCal and Gina with CarasAngels before going south. She had provided legendary cock satiating performance from the get go so the name change didn’t benefit her at all. Unless there was a “Gina” already present when she went to SoCal I see no reason for the name change. Others loke Cherry DD, Tits on a stick Nicole (who has been Nicole since 2013 in Honolulu, and latina thick Jaime know their service reputation is attached to their names and have retained that name whereever they go. Guess when the pussy in high demand u set your own rules. Jamie set her price and rules at GFEI when she visited.  Cherry DD does BB on the west coast but not NYC (strange).  If an RA provides crappy servic then yes, I understand the change of identity. I don’t mind at all that a K-Girl sets her own price cause it probably means she’s damned good.

Posted By: coeur-de-lion
Re: A few agencies have started that . . . .
in SoCal, where their websites have individual price points set by the girls based on how busy they are.  Obviously, the Kgirls want to charge as much as their own customers are willing to pay.  I don't think it will be long before this becomes the norm and you will see it spread throughout the country.   There are customers for Cadillacs and customers for Chevy's, so I don't see anything wrong with individual pricing.   Many of the smarter girls are realizing that when they have a good brand with a good reputation, they can exploit it.  Some years back, the bookers insisted on the girls switching names when they toured, and that now seems to be an unpopular practice with the top girls.  Multiple names often get consolidated into one profile on TER, anyway, when sharp-eyed reviewers spot girls they know using different names.  
   
   
 You mentioned Quinn.  When she contracted to go to Vegas under this same name, the booker was able to fully book her for the first four days based strictly on her SoCal reviews.  Several locals became regulars while she was there.

coeur-de-lion 400 Reviews 72 reads
posted
19 / 21

in the spring of 2018, bookers pretty much insisted on a name change so they could tell their local customers they have a "new" girl.  During the US blackout of TER and the permanent closure of CV, the top girls started realizing that they had to take part in their own marketing, and that's why you often see ads for Kgirls on other ad platforms like foxylists,.  Most of them figured out for themselves that their name is their brand and many started refusing to tour unless they could take their name with them.  Second and Third tier girls just want a place to work, so they are not fussy about what name they have to use in order to get a spot at an agency that has an opening.   If they are touring under their original name, they are most likely "that damned good" to borrow your phrase.  If they are willing to accept a name change, maybe they should be priced accordingly.  Of course, there will be exceptions, like the newer girls with salon experience who have not yet realized how good they are, the kind we all look for when we TOFTT with a FOTB Kgirl.  

team_rocket_qwerty 35 Reviews 78 reads
posted
20 / 21

Preference is preference, but my point was that even for the supposed "eye candy" girls we have now they simply aren't all that looks-wise in my experience.

 
For example, Ella. I know it's all subjective, but to me the gap between her and service queens (who aren't lookers) looks-wise is far smaller than between her and someone who'd I consider 9 in looks.

Billy D 65 Reviews 168 reads
posted
21 / 21
Register Now!