Please excuse an ignorant, but I have never heard K-Girl...
Tried to figure it from some of the contributers, but did not really
make me wiser.
The "urban dictionary" interpretation is something like an outstanding good looking girl.
But from that does not match well with those contributions I did read..
Angelo

The term is used (at least in Los Angeles) to describe a young Asian provider.  Here in LA, most to the young Asian providers are Korean, hence the the term, "K-girl".

The definition seems to differ from region to region.  Our brothers in Seattle attach  nationality/culture  to the definition but in LA, where the term originated,  the majority view emerging out of a recent discussion consider  a K-girl to be  a provider who offers GFE in classy residential unit, using a booker to schedule appointments .Her  menu content  , attitude , style and substance mirrors the service and high standards  provided by Los Angeles' Korean providers.  

This quote is representative of the sentiment expressed : "I would agree with the most of you saying I feel it is more about the service than it is about ethnicity. Sure majority of these girls are ethnically Korean, but there are a few exceptions to this like Yoco, Emily, & Etc. I would put those girls in the K-girl category. In the end these girls offer the same type of service that makes them "K-girls."

Whoever  that "Choco is a K-girl in L.A.  In D.C., Sira is a Korean provider but she is not a K-girl." Is an ignorant dumb mule
Starving for attention.

K-Dolls ( no not a Barbie/figure doll stupid but an affectionate term used among friends & lovers)  & Divas , were intended acknowledge the excellence of LA's K-girls are  becoming increasingly &  widely used by hobbyists , providers & hobby sites alike to distinguish LA K-girls from the rest.  

Just as a  Francophile or an  Anglophiles are neither French nor English not all K -girls are Korean they simply emulate or recreate the service , atmosphere and excellence  that LA's girls offer.  

Check this blog if  you are really interested to learn more. Most the featured girls . Most of the currently reviewed K-girls on TER are profiled there.
 
http://lakstyleblog.com

 

But then thirty percent of the K-girl board topics of discussion would disappear leaving only Harpman’s effusive info-mercials and other random shills and/or touring updates by their fans.

END OF MESSAGE

...than the competition.  They do this because many are here on a 90 day visa so they have to see as many guys as they can and they charge less to attract customers.

Take Rozel, for example.  She started out as a K-girl but quickly achieved K-doll status.  Some even say she achieved the rarefied K-diva status.  She offered great service to as many as 10 guys a day.  That's what Harpman60 said and when challenged by another poster that she couldn't possibly see that many, he defended the number and his math.

http://theeroticreview.com/discussion_boards/viewmsg.asp?MessageID=263759&boardID=1&page=144

However, high volume takes a toll on the K-girls.  Here is a link to Rozels' very last review, clearly showing she was burned out...

http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/showReview.asp?Review=1413850

Some may say that review was sour grapes by a new reviewer with very few reviews and not familiar with K-girls.  Au contraire mon frere, the reviewer has 206 reviews during his 12 years on TER and most of his reviews are of Asians.  

In short, don't believe the hype.  Take the time to see that there are two sides to every story.  And if you choose to see a K-girl, do what the K-boys themselves admit to doing - get an appointment in the morning.

in hobby context it means a prostitute who is korean.

for whatever reason other people seem to be adding things to this word thats way beyond its simple definition

Agree.  If she's not Korean, she's not a K-girl.  Yoco - Japanese, not a K-girl.  Hosi? 50/50 K/J -  that's enough blood. A gone for now but hopefully not forever K-girl.

Sorry, but I feel that this is a bad post. Bob is a good guy and doesn't deserve to be demeaned in any way shape or form, directly or indirectly.

...Bob IS a good guy.  I did not demean him in any way, shape or form.  My post was a comment on Harpman's habit of bestowing titles, i.e., doll, diva, duke.

It seems Harpman has elevated Bob above the rest of the K-hoi polloi.  If I were CENZO1, I'd be a little miffed at Harpman.  You have 94 reviews - at the very least you should be an earl or marquis, if not a duke like Bob.