As long it's fully honest and consistent with your experience, you should write it as is. Don't be intimidated by scare tactics from orgs. They employ it to protect their money when the product isn't up to par.
First, as long as the organization/agency/booker/whatever you want to call the entities, cannot connect your username on here to your monger persona, you should be very safe. Don't post the review on the same day and you should be in a good shape. Second, the scare tactics are largely bluffs imo - one of the most respected reviewers I've seen on another board was a brutally hard grader. He said things how they were without any sugarcoating (I'm talking 1,2 star ratings), and he was a regular at all the orgs. Bay area fellow mongers, you might've heard of captsketchi. Third, such tactics are STRICTLY PROHIBITED by TER in the review guidelines and are grounds for being banned. And - most importantly, you'll be helping out your fellow mongers, who will be very thankful for the info and you'll save them money. Newbie mongers get most of their info from reviews, before they make any connections. A negative review really helps out to not see the girl they would otherwise would've bitten on. CheersThe titling of your thread supposes that a monger has a sub par session. How often do you have sub par sessions? It's no bueno to walk into a session with the preconceived mindset that the session is going to be sub par. I walk into the session thinking I'd like to cum two times in the next hour. And if that is achieved, fucking awesome. What's sub par about that?!
-- Modified on 5/24/2020 3:23:39 AM
"...a monger has a sub par session." He said nothing about walking into a session "with the preconceived mindset that the session is going to be sub par."
He's talking about reviewing the provider AFTER the session. RE-view - look back at the session. RE-evaluate, RE-assess, RE-examine, all with the benefit of HINDSIGHT. He said nothing about what his mindset is going in. Your post "supposes'' that. Maybe with the benefit of hindsight, you'll re-view your post and see that you are wrong.
All I see is a wish sandwich --) you got pieces of bread and you wish you had some meat!
...1956!!!! In the song "Rubber Biscuit by The Chips. The Blues Brothers covered it in 1978. Get some new material.
board troll. He has never seen a Kgirl in his life, but somehow believes he has something of value to add on this board. You decide how much cred you want to give him. He comes around once or twice a month. On the other boards, they don't call him Big Papasan, its Big-Piece-of-Shit (BigPOS), just to give you a little perspective.
...coeur-de-lion. They call him Cur or Cur-de-Liar or Cock-Devouring-Liar. He's the biggest liar and bullshitter in the history of TER. He tells the stupidest jokes which no one gets and he has to come back and explain he was "only joking."
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/politics-and-religion-39/someone-needs-to-do-a-search-to-see-how-many-times-hes-said-he-was-only-joking--356070?page=
BTW, Cur-de-Liar, what does your post have to do with this thread? My posts were proper responses on topic. What does your post have to do with the price of tea in China? Or considering this is the K-girl board, what does your post have to do with the price of Budae Jjigae at Chinju Han-il Kwan?
aren't you. Only YOU and your ballwashers on the P & R board call me that because when I post there, I make you all look stupid. Funny how easy it is to bait you into a meltdown. That's why you are so wound up right now. I guess I haven't lost my touch. Bwahahahaha
Tell the board about your Kgirl experience. This IS the Kgirl board. What can you contribute. You are here to troll, pure and simple, because you can't pass screening to see Kgirls. All the veterans here know it.
Remember the time you said you knew more about Harpman than anyone else? You got your ass handed to you that day. By me. You didn't come back on that board for nearly a week. Shall we put the links here so everyone can see what a fool you made of yourself?
I think you're giving too much credit there.
What is being said is that reviews should be written without concern for any retaliation by the agency if they don't like the scores or recap. I will also say I he also wants the review to be honest assessments of the experience.
That is certainly something we should expect from the reviews. That is also something we know is not 100%.
However, what it really lacking here is that we don't really know with a high degree of certainty if any given review (for all but the completely incompetently written reviews) if par review should have been a subpar review or if that par review was the persons honest assessment which just happened to differ from others.
Also we don't really know to what extent just not writing that subpar review cause other mongers any problem with finding a good session or avoiding a bad one. Rocket Keyboard seem to think it does but I'm not sure he has any good basis for that view.
Mr Twoon, given that we've talked on another forum for over a year, and you know damn well what I preach, I find it very hard to believe you misinterpreted my post accidentally. However, if this was really the case, BigPapasan's response pretty much covers it. Also, glad to see you're finally giving less-than-perfect reviews on here.
Cheers
Rocketbro, you failed to mention that you're an annonymous monger with the orgs and kgirls. Your rationale is that you have alot to lose if word got out that you're a pariah monger (I am too) and if they don't disclose their true identity, then why the fuck should you?!?!
Unlike you, I'm a full disclosure monger with the orgs and kgirls for 30 + years. Just my style and haven't been burned. I count myself lucky.
The orgs and kgirls know me. They read my reviews.
What's my point? I guess I take a different approach to the game than you do. I'm not out to get over on anyone and I've been lucky to hit it outta the park on most of my sessions. I'm a good looking, seasoned and respectful monger who looks to have a mutually beneficial hour of pleasure with a beautiful and sexy provider.
Plus I have magic tricks up my sleeve and what girl isn't up for a little distraction?!
My approach pays dividends in the form of perks such as pre-books at my preferred times, special requests and the girls give me their digits to keep in touch.
Membership has its privileges.
experience and longevity plays a huge part is minimizing bad experiences, and doing your homework is a huge part of keeping the duds off your TDL. Guys getting burned have always been the ones that don't do enough research before pulling the trigger on seeing a particular girl.
When I started 12 years ago (kudos to you for 30+ years), after I saw my first hundred Kgirls, which took about 15 months because I like to repeat with the good ones. I read hundreds, maybe over a thousand, reviews from guys in SoCal who saw the same girls I did. I flagged the ones that seemed to have the same tastes as me in Kgirls as far as looks and service, and who had a similar experience to mine. Since then, I have used this list to give more weight to their reviews of girls I have not seen yet, so all reviews are not equal for me. It was time-consuming in the beginning to compile the list, but it has served me well since then. Another valuable resource is Private Messaging here on TER. I have found most reviewers, at least in my area, to be more than willing to answer additional questions about a girl they reviewed. Of course, it its a fake review, you get crickets. Lol
Huh ? Where did I fail to mention that I don't give PII info to orgs ? Said it in another thread.
And in this very thread,
"as long as the organization/agency/booker/whatever you want to call the entities, cannot connect your username on here to your monger persona, you should be very safe"
What does "cannot connect your username on here to your monger persona" mean to you ?
No org or booker ever has asked me to provide any online handles as part of verification. Therefore, you can write whatever the fuck you want behind an alias that isn't connected. Hell, TER provides one free alias too, so even if you provide a TER handle, you can write FROM YOUR ALIAS without fear of repercussions from the orgs.
To hijack your thread Rocketman!!!
I get your position of not being beholden to the orgs and kgirls. So, just wanted to share my view of the scene. No offense meant. My apologies Sir!!!
This board used to be part of the L.A. Discussion board. But there were so many posts about K-girls that TER started this K-girl board.
For years, I was the only one who was saying that reviewers of K-girls would never give K-girls bad reviews because they were deathly afraid of the bookers. They didn't want to get on the bad side of the bookers for fear of getting blacklisted. So they'd leave a good review instead of an honest bad review which didn't help their fellow mongers at all as you said. That goes against the very reason TER was created - to disseminate info about providers to fellow mongers to help them make an informed decision about which provider to see.
Don't know about LA but a quick look with DC as the center for the search gets a lot of reviews that are agency, Asian with the max on looks and performance set to 7. I only found on for a K-Agency I know and one for C-Agency in the area but all the reviews were with a file for agency so no independents. Lots of 5 and 6 and even one 4/2 that I saw.
Perhaps one might want to claim, that just proves the point. See how none of the K-Agencies are fairly review and all the clients beaten into submission from fear of blacklisting. I would suggest that is a rather problematic effort at interpreting the empirical data. The view that the K-Agencies consistently deliver above average quality is just as consistent with the data.
My personal experience, which is anecdotal, does lean strongly towards the latter view than the former. Perhaps LA and the Bay area are different. I'll let the west coast guys argue that.
I'll admit, the situation on TER is certainly a lot better than the place I've came from. I've seen some pretty fairly reviewed girls here, at least in my area, that are consistent with my evaluation, at least relative to each other. However, the orgs were advised by their pr guys to be more careful and ease off the spam, at least the ones who came from the bay, after the EM fiasco. I want to see what happens after social distancing ceases and they get more comfortable on here. I'm here simply to raise awareness and help newbies. Plus, once a cheater, always a cheater...if that makes them money, they will try to do it again en masse. That's my reasoning.
With that said, it certainly contrasts with CDLs stories about bookers BLing anyone who as much dares to give a girl below a 7. Maybe it's a LA thing. Because the reviews of bay area girls, at least, correspond more or less with the reality and there are a lot of 6s and whatnot. The LA girls I know are less accurately reviewed, but at least theyre in ballpark.
Another thing is I'll admit is that the kgirl quality overall is generally higher than of other offerings. Which is perfect for me because I love asian girls and I love service. My reviews are always relative to other kgirls, not all escorts. The average kgirl experience is better than average escort experience.
I'm not a guy who is always anti-org, Im only anti-org when they engage in bullshit tactics. If they dont interfere with customer feedback and dont do bait-and-switch and have respect their clients, I have nothing against them and give them respect back. And when there's a thing like a robbery or some other shit, I'm with them and will offer my help if needed. I don't tolerate bullshit from mongers' end, either. I remember some monger complained that the girl wasnt happy she asked him to cum outside and he CIPd instead. He shouldve been BLd for that imo and it's not even arguable, unless it got lost in translation (even then, too bad). Doing something against a girl's will is a no-no.
At the end of the day though, I give more praise to the girls, because theyre the ones doing the fucking. Orgs just provide scheduling housing and transportation to the girls. KGirls are the ones who troop through 10-12 clients on a busy day without sometimes as much as breaking a sweat.
I think I went slightly off topic here. Happy memorial day !
Man, it's the little things that show what some mongers on here REALLY think of newbie mongers vs orgs.
Just from another thread,
1. Newbie mongers were called idiots for looking only at review scores. The source of this statement was never cited, and when I asked for the source, I didn't receive it.
2. Mongers were blamed for giving lower grades for CFS girls because they didn't provide BBFS. The source of this info was also not cited.
3. When it was mentioned that orgs were doing fake reviews on another site, many automated, the immediate defense of orgs came in, even without knowing much about it.
4. Even bait-and-switch tactics were said to be ok and asked to be kept out of reviews, because, I quote, avoiding having ACCUSATORY TONE with the booker. Can you actually believe this shit ? (digression: I remember I shat on one PO via text, because she fucked up my scheduling during a binge that included like 4 girls in the row, and she actually gave me a partial refund. The girl I saw instead of the girl I was supposed to, wasn't too good, so I then gave a mediocre review. Everything was fair. Nothing fucking happened. The world didn't fall apart)
Notice the pattern here ? It's pretty noticeable. The (newbie) mongers are always in the bad here. The orgs can do no wrong. Even if there was a bait-and-switch, you apparently shouldn't post it in the review, because it would be 'accusatory' fucking tone ! LMAO. Damn right it's accusatory if I get another girl from the one which I requested !
This attitude of "shut the fuck up and eat what you're given, or else" is hilarious, and the people saying this have the nerve to call themselves 'pro monger'.
Hell, there is one org in the bay that advertises the same girl as TWO DIFFERENT GIRLS. At the same time, on the same page, with different pictures and different names. It's literally solely designed to trap newbies. Because everyone who's "in the loop" knows about this bullshit. I'm sure the org-defending entities on here will find some reasoning to somehow defend and spin this.
Thanks for the kind words, man. I appreciate anyone who isn't cowering in fear of orgs or affiliates and can see who I ride for here.
A lot of spurious claims and not even one link to an example of anything you're talking about.
Still waiting for you to point out a SINGLE incidence of an org writing a fake review on TER to shill one of their girls. Its time to put up or STFU, my friend.