Free BB vs. Paid BB: A Dilemma of Preference and Risk?
It recently came to light that one of the most popular girls in the current lineup has been offering free BB services, in addition to her exceptional attitude and performance, which have helped her secure a top spot. Typically, many K-girls or J-girls provide BB as a premium option for an additional fee. This raises an interesting question: when other factors like service quality are comparable, how would one decide between a complimentary BB experience and a paid upgrade? Moreover, does the fact that some girls offer free BB raise concerns about potential health risks, such as a higher likelihood of STDs? Or is it something that doesn't weigh heavily in the decision-making process?In bay area bb has been an all-inclusive option for a while now.
So it's not really as clear cut as you make it out to be.
Then the same girls would travel and do upcharges elsewhere.
It is only relatively recently that is bay bros started to have kgirls upcharge for bb. And there are many prolific mongers who flat out ideologically refuse to do the bb upcharge.
I think that there’s a minimal difference in risk between free and paid BBFS.
As far as preference goes, Rocket already noted that mongers prefer BBFS with no extra charge.
While I'm in solidarity with mongers who don't like upcharges especially after it's been all inclusive for ages..unlike my bros I don't think upcharge for bb (msog is very different) is inherently bad.
Given a choice between overall price going up or only bb upcharge going up I'd choose the latter. All inclusive bb can also be hard to pass up for someone because it feels you paid for it already even if you don't want bb. Whereas with upcharge you can forego it without feeling priced in.
Of course the reality is its not like 280 with no bb vs 350 with bb. It's 300 with bb inclusive for some orgs and it's 300 for cfs and +100 bb upcharge for upcharge girls here... so it's still not a real choice. What I mean is if I want to see a bb girl but only do cfs with all inclusive it will cost the same as with no condom.
As far as risk goes...its all the same I agree. You probably have a greater risk with girls who do greek bb. But otherwise free or paid doesn't matter much imo.
The ones that charge a premium? I don't go bare so I honestly don't know.
Couple of my long time regulars do provide me with free bb. I do not ask for it and I don't get it at every visit. I get it because I am a reliable and gentle customer.
"Free BB"
What a ludicrous misnomer. "Inclusive" is accurate.
It's all "Paid BB".
Use a cover.
Good for you. Good for the girl. Good for everybody else.
the question of bareback may seem counterintuitive at times. Theoretically, if a girl is not charging extra, she is free to INVITE only those she feels safe with to partake. However, if a girl is advertising BBFS, she has a harder time saying "no" to a guy who booked her expecting BBFS regardless of the fact that he may have a wart on his dick or is hung like a stallion. For the girls that don't charge extra, the model really doesn't work to their advantage unless they can stay UTR like they did 8-10 years ago. Bareback was never mentioned in reviews nor discussed on the boards, and the system worked well for everyone.
Many of the girls who are NOW GFE only used to offer BBFS UTR to a limited number of their regulars, usually guys coming two or more hours a week, either in one session or two. Once someone outs her, then EVERYONE is pressuring her to give it up and her work is no fun anymore. Some of the top-tier girls who left LA got tired of having every swinging dick who walked through the door asking for bareback. This is a good example of killing the goose that lays the golden eggs. Not everyone gets a golden egg, but without the goose, NOBODY gets one. A few guys who can't keep their mouths shut and betray a girl who has trusted them to keep their mutual BBFS activities a secret end up ruining the deal for everyone, including themselves. Usually, it's the younger, insecure guys who want to brag that they are getting BBFS from an UTR girl. Kgirls who advertise GFE only absolutely HATE guys asking for bareback. However, if you keep your mouth shut and become a regular, she still might offer it at some point.
To answer your question, generally speaking, BBFS girls who advertise are rarely ever comparable to the top-tier girls that are GFE only. The girls that are not as pretty or skilled who advertise bareback KNOW that you are seeing them because you can fuck them bare, not because they are such great providers, so they have no incentive to give you a 100% effort. If yon read a few hundred reviews of BBFS Kgirls, you will notice that the reviews often show average or below-average service, save for the fact that they did not have to wear a cover. Yet, younger guys continue to flock to them JUST because they can get BBFS. Always remember that allowing BBFS requires no special skills in the way of BBBJ or any other activities. You are paying strictly for the right to remove the cover. Unfortunately, that is how the sellers of BBFS view the Buyers. That's why so many mongers whine about the service in their reviews. There are always outliers that do their best no matter what, but these are mostly those who also have issues in the Looks category. They do what they have to in order to compete with the top girls.
I agree with you that BBFS is overrated, IMO, from kgirls who advertise.
Unfortunately it looks like your attempt to purchase VIP membership has failed due to your card being declined. Good news is that we have several other payment options that you could try.
We thank you for your purchase!
Membership should be activated shortly. You'll receive notification!
