Thanks for the response. I'd prefer if you replied back through the pm, but here is fine as well.
1. Imo performance scores can be improved, but look scores can't.
2. That's fine, but this kinda answers why negative feedback is more needed imo, because it's actively suppressed not only by orgs/girls but um, Klients, as well
3. Eh, Jensen said he doesnt put enough stock into reviews. He went so far as to say there shouldn't be reviews with ratings but rather vouches. So Id venture to say he put stock maybe into the private/backchannel group,but not the public reviews. I'm trying to figure out if the aversion to rating a girl publicly, especially lower than a certain threshold, is commonplace in private groups. And I wonder if you actually rate them in private groups.
4. So in order to attract more kgirls, does this mean create an atmosphere where publicly there is less information about negatives and hence easier to attract clientele as a result? Isn't this exactly what I'm saying talking about when I say sweeping things under the rug? If the girls would all be amazing, you wouldn't have to withhold negative reviews, right?
So clearly withholding negative reviews did something that attracted girls. And I'm ready to bet it wasn't just the girls feelings. Girls indirectly got more money with you not publishing those reviews, am I right to make such conclusion.?
I do appreciate the dialogue. Thanks for the responses.