are going to become a Kgirl monger, even though you refer to them as cum-dumps and low-end sluts? (I can provide the links if you forgot you said this shit.) What happened? Did they run you off of the other boards so you brought your troll ass over here to try to pretend you are relevant somewhere?
Good luck trying to break into the Kgirl scene. You have less chance than a Newbie on his first day.
For many years, the first reviewers of K-girls would create profiles that would blindly follow the ads of the K-girls. It seemed like 95% of K-girls were 21-25 y.o, 5'3' -5'5" and had enhanced C cups. I thought Harry Mudd was churning them out like he did with his androids.
K-girl reviewers did not rely on their own observations because they were deathly afraid of being blacklisted by the bookers and the K-orgs. They were afraid that if they put what they thought the real age was when they created the profile, then the bookers would BL them. This is similar to what qwerty has been posting about - informing hobbyists by giving them accurate reviews. Hobbyists showing up expecting to see Alice 1-500 (see photo below) would instead find Harry Mudd's shrew of a wife Stella. Yikes!
But things have been getting better lately. There are more 26-30 y.o. and even some 31-35s. Yesterday I saw a new profile where the ad said she was 23 but the reviewer who created the profile listed her age as 36-40. Good for him and good for his K-bros who read the profile. They won't be unpleasantly surprised when the door opens.
are going to become a Kgirl monger, even though you refer to them as cum-dumps and low-end sluts? (I can provide the links if you forgot you said this shit.) What happened? Did they run you off of the other boards so you brought your troll ass over here to try to pretend you are relevant somewhere?
Good luck trying to break into the Kgirl scene. You have less chance than a Newbie on his first day.
CDL, Are you going crazy on Papasan because of his unfavorable comments about you in an earlier post. Or is there a history here. I am trying to figure out if you are indeed a "pouting little girl" as papasan suggests who strikes back at anyone who critiques you or threatens your perch. Nonetheless, your input as far as the main purpose of TER goes is appreciated
Guess twoon said it....my bad
basher going back seven or eight years, even before I started posting here. He denigrates all of us who see Kgirls. He calls the girls low-end sluts and cum-dumps because he can't get in to see them. So before you blame me for this, go back to 2016 and see how he has been the resident troll here, bashing the monger who post here and the girls we see. He usually comes here whenever someone has run him off one of the other boards. We got a break while TER was dark because he was too stupid to figure out how to use VPN for access. We did not miss him during those 20 months.
Got it. As Twoon was saying, we dealt with a new one or different aliases every second week, and at times they created 3/4 of the boards posts. They did become hard to ignore and their bait was tempting, but if one resisted the itch to type out a response and just ignored them they would stew and burn themselves and go away.
A troll is a hideous creature that lives under a bridge in Wonderland. Theirs is a sad life indeed.
There are those mongers who feel these kgirls' sole purpose in life is to be cum slut, cum dumpster recepticles. They'd espouse that we mongers have no game, are fat and old and ugly and thus have to pay for pussy. Basically, we are hideous, pariah mongers who could only fuck and suck transactionally.
There was a troll back at Neurotic Donkey named 'Yeezus Babo'. He'd go on and on about BS and follow the more affluent, high volume TOFTT mongers on the San Ho and Penn boards calling them org shills.
Speaking as a "fat and old and ugly" monger, I'd just like to point out that we do not "have to pay for pussy". On the contrary, we GET to pay for pussy. And I'm talking about top-shelf, quality pussy. not the $40 street ho's.
.
Big difference. Just saying...
.
Life is good.
.
The Cat
But he at least put the off switch in place -- just keep Kirk and team way!
But yes, too often the ad was all that was used for the profile. However, for the age I think a lot of people in the USA will have some challenges in accurately assessing the age but....
What was the old rule -- 21 - 25 means 30s and 26 - 30 means late 30s to mid 40s?
age adjustment because you have actually seen Kgirls. All he has done is look at profiles on TER. He has NO PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE that younger girls are coming, only that profiles are showing younger ages. Most white guys can't tell Kgirl ages correctly. They are often off by ten years, sometimes more. The first reviewer who is setting up the profile mostly get it wrong. If you have read my reviews, you know that is a pet peeve of mine and I will always put an age correction in my review. Many Kgirls offer to show me their ID, so I know I'm right when I post an age correction in a review.
I joked with a booker once that he was lucky to be able to ONLY hire Kgirls that were 26 years old. EVERY girl that came through his place during a 3-year period was 26 in the ad. After that, he started putting different ages, but not necessarily the correct ages. Lol
Being an Asian half breed does help of course, but even I am fooled.
Years ago I was dating an Asian Agency girl and she had LOTs of friends, she did all their horoscopes which of course required their REAL birthdates, one day I looked at the list she had compiled and out of about two dozen girls who advertised as being between about 22-28, only ONE was even in her twenties at all, most of them were at least mid thirties and more than a few were over forty. Even I had no idea just how big the discrepancy between advertised age and real age actually was. I knew all of the girls and had fucked well over half of them and even I was surprised
Should I get on Rocket's bandwagon with my car analogy and start calling for vagina odometers?
So, does this mean advertising a 40+ year old as a 20 year old is outside of the unacceptable range ?
But according to the other thread, advertising a 60 year old as a 30 year old seemed like inside the unacceptable range.
20ish year difference is ok. 30 year old not ok. This range sounds like something you'd have in mind ? As usual, just trying to see a rigid line you're willing to draw.
If you made any attempt to understand what I've been saying I would be nice but you are a fucking idiot who seem to have a one trick pony. Scream and yell about something that has already passed (fake review, fake picture or whatever) and then wait for the next time. No effort to learn and take any proactive efforts to deal with the imperfections of the world.
That doesn't help the newbies at all. Is your goal to get them to sign up for some rocket special report on bad agencies so they know what happened yesterday or last week? Certainly your sage advice was well subscribed for your two post to the newbie board.
All I asked for is a range for what is considered unacceptable marketing to you. I want to hear YOUR opinion on what's unacceptable. Where do YOU draw the line ? I've yet to hear a coherent answer. I'm in tech, everything can be quantified.
Throw some ad hominems at me, sure. That will surely help your argument.
I put up work on multiple boards and venues. The fact that you say I have no effort to take proactive effort, is insulting to me. Just the other day multiple people on another popular kgirl board for LA thanked me for preventing a trip to see a certain rebrand girl, who they would've otherwise seen. But I posted a big PSA saying 'AVOID'. And the guy who felt like he had to see her because he was scared that the booker would BL him if he canceled his prebook, said that he should've listened to me.
You'll have to excuse me, but I value those thankful mongers more than I value your opinion. It is what it is.
I tried posting a similar PSA here on the forum as well, but it was deemed to have 'VIP information' by TER.
-- Modified on 6/8/2020 8:07:58 PM
vagina mileage do not always line up. VJ mileage is more a function of how long they have been a working girl, not how old they are. The average Kgirl sees anywhere from 1500 to 2000 dicks a year. Granted, some she will learn to recognize because many guys repeat. That means in 5-7 years, she will have been fucked over 10,000 times. That will put serious wear and tear on even a 28 year old pussy. I've seen so many worn out pussies on young women that SHOULD still be beautiful, based on their age, that I can't even look at a pastrami sandwich anymore.
speaking of assessing the age of Korean women, apparently YouTube is challenged.
You need to hit Toronto. ALL the girls at the agency I use there are 19 
but I have been there a few times and I LOVE the Asian pussy they have up there. The restaurants are pretty good too. Hey you can't live by pussy alone. There's just not enough calories in pussy juice to keep your strength up with out adding some actual nourishment every once in while, and I am getting too old to get all my calories from tequila. lol
I realize you’re making a joke.
But I have to admit that the occasions I mongered in Toronto I had a pretty great time with younger and less inhibited providers than I was readily finding in the Bay Area at the time. But that was about 10 years ago.
and yes, I thoroughly enjoyed the female company I found in Toronto, between that and the GREAT Chinese food up there it "almost" made up for the super crappy weather.
Having both the university and Toronto just having a good Asian community in general helps on the age count.
But I agree the average there is better than it is here where I am - at least now, 3 or so years back was a different story.
That instead of addressing the topic, cdl went straight to bashing the topic starter with some ad hominems and old grudges. Lol.
Forget age difference, how about 'pics accurate' part? There are multiple girls who look nothing like their pics, at all. Jenna in San Mateo/SJ, for example. Even if you're exceptionally inebriated, you won't confuse the girl in front of you with the pics.
...The subject line of my post was POSITIVE: "K-girl profiles have been changing for the better recently..."
The body of the post discussed how it was to all mongers' benefit to get the age right when creating the profile. Yet all CDL did was attack me. Not one single word about the subject matter of the post. Do you know why? Because he can't refute one single word of my post. He knows it's 100% true.
Obviously, CDL doesn't give a shit if the profiles are accurate. He doesn't give a shit if his fellow mongers show up and find the K-girl is really a K-woman or a K-old hag.
CDL seems like a reasonable guy and I guess I can understand you wanting to talk to him.
But is it OK if we go back to talking about how to have fun with hot kgirls?
-- Modified on 6/8/2020 7:57:08 PM
my body type. Since I'm a SoCal guy, I also like the girls that tan, but that's most often available with the mature girls 35+ years old. This girl looks 31-35, so she would be doable for me.
She is exactly my favorite body type too. Well, if those were natural boobs it would be exact. But they don’t really look natural. Still close enough for me.
Now, if I could find a kgirl in the Bay Area that looked like her and loved sex, I’d be booking her as quickly as I could find a spot in her schedule.
-- Modified on 6/8/2020 9:56:15 PM
criticize me for being dismissive of the troll and then the next thing you say is "forget age difference", which was the topic he started. Don't you find that rather duplicitous?
The point is that the troll has never seen a Kgirl in his life. He can't get approved. Yet without any personal knowledge or experience, he feels qualified to interpret Kgirl profiles and reviews for guys that DO see Kgirls. Knowing he has never seen a Kgirl, would you trust his judgment or advice on ANYTHING Kgirl related? I think I can safely say that I don't know of a single veteran that has been here 5+ years who would think he has any cred AT ALL when it comes to Kgirls.
He's sucking up to you because he desperately wants a monger friend. He doesn't have any, even after being here for 15 years. I have a feeling you two might be perfect for each other. However, one day you will wake up with a sharp pain between your shoulder blades and find its the knife he stuck in your back. There are many anecdotes on the GD board about what a sleaze he is. But hey, when you lay down with dogs, you wake up with fleas. It is what it is.
I just don't get why you had to use ad hominems and not address the topic on hand. Feel free to pm me this 'trolls' history, you know I'm a newbie on TER.
Sorry if I criticized you, it's just I don't like the whole 'you lack cred' statements, and this is what you presented to me too at first, remember ? 'once you see hundreds of kgirls and bookers you will learn blah blah'. Maybe you also think I haven't seen any kgirls and just go off existing reviews. Who knows.
for researching old posts on this, or any other, board.
...and YOU still have NOT provided links to where I said K-girls were "cum-dumps and low-end sluts?" Why not? Were you bullshitting as you always do?
Still waiting for the links.
This one is actually a twofer. Its the post you put up where you tried to sell your scam whitelisting, and at the same time, you were bashing kgirls. I invite the others here to read my post immediately following, where I completely exposed your scam. Carla is a PM friend of mine, and had not seen you since your original review of her several years earlier. Nice try to game the system with a false whitelist. I can't believe you challenged me to post this. You are an embarrassment to trolls everywhere.
-- Modified on 6/8/2020 3:29:45 PM
While I can see that high-volume kgirls who do bbfs might not be to ones liking, I think this is good enough proof, CDL.
Im an objective guy, and BigPapa, he does have you there. I don't know how TER whitelist works so I'm not qualified to speak there, but I will say that I don't fight unconditionally against korgs, just their misrepresentations in ads and feedback. Otherwise, I wouldn't see them, lol.
And specifically, I consider kgirls to be absolute troopers. I don't know how they see 10-12 guys a day and still have the energy to do so. It's hard ass work.
on down the thread, with the troll ultimately getting his ass handed to him when he bragged about his knowledge of an infamous Kgirl exploiter. Turns out someone else knew a little more than he did. LOL
Scroll down to where you find the link above highlighted in pink, and read on from there.
-- Modified on 6/8/2020 3:48:48 PM
...haven't posted the links where I said K-girls were "cum-dumps and low-end sluts" as you said you would in this post:
"...you refer to them as cum-dumps and low-end sluts? (I can provide the links if you forgot you said this shit.)"
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/k-girl-113/does-that-mean-you-----18159?page=1
Well, I'm waiting.
This one's a twofer also. Here is where you called Kgirls "cum dumpsters" and you also called them "disease-carrying." That's a pretty bold claim from a guy who has never seen one, and smacks of racial prejudice against Kgirls. Before I put up the last one you say I don't have, how about YOU showing any evidence that Kgirls are "disease-carrying" like you claim. Put up or shut up. There's no way to salvage this. Now the BA guys that have recently joined see from your own words why you are BigPOS.
You also said Kgirls were "disgusting." That raises the question . . . . If this is what you think of Kgirls, why are you here trying to befriend Kgirl mongers who obviously don't know about your history of denigrating Kgirls? Even though we don't all have the same opinion of the orgs that these girls work for, I think I can safely say that we all appreciate and enjoy our time spent with Kgirls. The only thing that is disgusting is that you keep coming here given your true feelings about Kgirls.
...O All-Knowing One, what do you call K-girls who do BBFS with their customers but only take a ten minute break between johns? I would call them CUM DUMPSTERS, not "cump dumps" as you lied that I said.
How the hell would I know that K-girls fuck tricks BBFS with only a ten minute break if I've never seen a K-girl? I just read the post of the K-girl board's resident genius...YOU! Your words:
"The standard break between customers now is most often 10 minutes. Show me a Kgirl that says she can do a complete cleaning after CIP, change the linen and clean up from the last customer while preparing for the next one within ten minutes, and I'll show you a liar."
Even YOU don't want to see cum dumpster K-girls who do BBFS with ten minute breaks between mongers:
"This is why the key for me giving up UTR BBFS girls a few years ago was the shortening of the break time between customers more than any other factor."
Thanks for playing!
There is no way to sugar-coat your contempt for Kgirls. The fact that I don't see BBFS girls (in fact, I did see one in Vegas recently and reviewed her, but I was the first appointment of the day.) does not mean that I find Kgirls disgusting, low-rent, almost trafficked, disease-carrying, or any of the other contemptuous remarks you have made about Kgirls. I've been the real life boyfriend to eleven Kgirls, counting my current one. If I had any of the feelings you have about them, I would not be seeing them on the outside.
You come here looking for new friends, pretending to the new guys that you have nothing against Kgirls. But your prior posts like the ones I have shared here cannot disguise the contempt you also have for those of us who patronize Kgirls. So how about you crawl back into your rathole and GFY?
-- Modified on 6/9/2020 2:14:53 AM