I’ve run across a few reviews where guys will defer BBFS because a high volume girl takes many loads internally, but in the previous sentence or the next one describes DATY in the same session. We know some of these chicks barely make time to clean between customers and sometimes not at all (in one Honolulu establishment some chicks would be literally dripping jizz from the last rando as they walked into the room). Some of  those fellows may read this and I ask; why not just go all in (so to speak). I would reason dipping your dick in cum filled or cum residue lined pussy is slightly less undesirable (unless its your thing)  than twirling your tongue inside said used puss. You run the same risk of catching the same diseases of you went balls deep. This is no rant against the bareback brigade at all, Ive been down that ecstasy filled yet risk fraught road myself. However I fond it amusing when mongers will forego an activity with a high volume PSE girl and immediately engage in another that carries equal risk. No judgment. Just curious as to the rationale employed for session.

I've said the same thing on other Threads and mentioned the P2P slide! The slide is contact with the providers juices that for some reason is not thought of as any risk! And, then they get covered for safety against STD's! The "they" group I am talking about is all the anti BBFS/Kgirl people that get pretty worked up in their posts. I say let the providers run their business the way they want and go to someone you are comfortable with! Pretty simple, "live and let live"!

but....

 
You've heard the terms "hooker math" here before I suppose. I think what you're getting at is probably best described as "monger logic".  I'm sure they have their rationale for their choices (or just never thought it thought) but I'm not sure I would agree with it being logically consistent.

Agreed. I’ve been weak enough to succumb to the charms of a smokin hot K-girl, DFK, DATY and plunge in raw but when doing so I knew the risk I ran. On the other hand I didnt think “no bareback or DFK with this one cause she takes too many loads” and then go dine at the Y. I read a couple reports like that a couple days ago and I couldn’t help but shaking my head in amusement. To each his own.

The anti-bb crusaders are amusing as well. These same mofos will dive face first into the same pussy they strap up for to avoid STI’s. GFE/PSE service would be nigh impossible without at least DFK, DATY, BBBJ but some fellas reasoning for doing this but not that is laughable at best. Guess that humorous aspec is half of why I read the reviews.

"Anti-bb crusader", but I have been consistently critical of the douches who "out" YMMV girls that are offering BBFS discretely on a case by case basis.  I also know the risks, so I don't knowingly see girls who openly advertise BBFS or have a consistent history of indiscriminate BBFS in their reviews.  There have always been YMMV BBFS girls in the Kgirl scene, so this is not going to stop me from seeing the girls that are UTR and enjoying a GFE menu unless I personally experience a hygiene issue with her.  

The UTR girls are gems. As you said there will always be top draw kgirls who give up the best to their favorites. Unfortunately some of those favorite customers fuck it up and have to brag to the community that they banged (insert ultra hot gfe provider name here) bareback. Saw this shit in Hawaii and Texas too. Then the white knights and anti-bb lynch mob come out of the woodwork. I have nothing against the the BBFS hounds except when they push a provider to go BB or try to get it by nefarious means. CDL, you are certainly Anti BB (have no issues with that) but not one of the pitchfork and torch wielding zealots which makes a reader more open to the point you seek to convey. At any rate Im glad to be in another Kgirl monger community with all the usual  quirks and fun.

I do go covered and I love the Kgirl scene! One thing I've asked about the anti group is what's the anger and hatred about! People give their comments and opinions,  which is what the board is about. I just wonder why the hatred is so blatant in their posts.  The derogatory names and comments about prices, which I know are reasonable for the service IMO, and any opportunity to put them down! Like I said I've asked with a thread, had one response, maybe you guys can give me a reason they attack the Kgirls like they do. Thanks up front!

I think Taylor Swift has a song with the answer for you.

Do you find that your K-Girl girlfriends that you see off the clock have good hygiene?  You know the one's who consider your relationship monogamous since you pay other providers for sex while they are working?  And do you enjoy giving them a creampie under the circumstance that you posted about in the spring?  Should I believe a mutual friend of ours PM that you find it extra "sexy" when you penetrate (sans cover) under recently "well used" circumstances?

I can't wait for your reply!

Like the wind blows in different directions so does his postings.  In the winter and spring he was singing a different tune.  Dig deeper and you will find the truth

Listening to the big head and avoiding the little head's impulse is so important these days!  Smart post.

Thanks. If I were truly smart I wouldn’t be engaging in this semi-perilous yet ecstasy filled hobby. Sometimes there is a reasoning (at least in our own minds if not in general) that determines our actions. The fact that many of these lovely K-birds will let almost any rando with a wad of cash (sans STI test results) slide his bare cock inside her and pump away to completion is all together shocking, exilerating, and erotic. I think that is a draw for some if not most of us that these wanton p4p vixens are so willing if not agreeable to slutty acts. We’re all willing to ignore fact that the “mostly” GFE girl we’re playing tonsil hockey with just had some other guy unloading his balls in her throat less than 15 minutes ago (hope that blue toast was thorough) It’s part of the game. For those of us who can manage more CPU processing power (hats off to you) with the upper head, we select girls we deem to have least amount of risks we are willing to accept. The rest of us succumb to the instincts programmed into us since before we walked upright. No shame on either group in my eyes except where undue judgement or malicious acts threaten the hobby or those associated with it.

Badger I agree. I despise two-faced fuckers who go on hateful rants regarding that side od the community. Some focus specifically on the Kgirl/asian MP side. The desire to go bare is as natural as it gets. We understand that but most of us weigh the possible negative outcome and play it as safe as we deem necessary without compromising the desired outcome (bustin a nut). The vitriol spewed by the more exreme crusaders is a curious thing to me. If you don’t like the fact that random guys are dumping loads in your prospective lay, then put her on your “no fuck” list and move on. Theres far too many reasonably safe providers out there to get wrapped around the axle about BB. My inital post centered on curious practices of psedo-safety guys but I had no delusions it would invove this subject. Thanks for the input.

So it is open to critique.  

 
But-I believe many mongers don't fear anything but a House In Viriginia, given that anything besides herpes is treatable with a zpack.

While transmission of the virus via heterosexual vaginal penetration is low, transmission via daty is almost unheard of.

Each of us has our own level of risk tolerance, and although you think I'm "anti-bb", I'm not really, and over the years have enjoyed BBFS with UTR girls as much as anybody over the years.  I do limit myself to girls that are very discreet about it.  
My only "anti" stance is against the guys who "out" YMMV girls who are just trying to prudently manage their BBFS activities and limit the access to guys they know, without being hassled by every guy who walks through the door.  These are two separate issues, IMO.  Going bare is a natural urge.  Outing girls who are going bare is a dick move.    

 
My own risk tolerance is obviously lower than others here.  I have my own standards for who, and under what circumstances, I will accept an OFFER of BBFS (I never ask for it) from a certain I know pretty well, but I certainly don't condemn anyone with a higher risk tolerance than I have.  We must each choose for ourselves, because we only have to live with the risks and potential consequences that each of us take on our own.  There have been many stories over the years on these boards from guys who went bare in the heat of the moment, and then agonized over the next week waiting for symptoms to show up.  The key is to set you risk tolerance parameters and then have the restraint to stick to them.  

 
For me, the worst part about an STD is having to bench myself for two weeks while the meds run their course.  When you are used to seeing three girls a week, two weeks can seem like an eternity.  

I stay away from BBFS in the mongering world as much as possible. Like many others, I have succumbed to temptation on occasion and been on pins and needles for the next week. I will see providers who do bbfs, but I only do daty if I have the first appt. of the day! At least then there is some chance I am starting with a clean slate!

Heh, House In Virgina. Took my dumb ass a couple reads to sort that out. If I had no SO  I’d be PREPing and rawdogging till my dick down to a nub. But alas obligations and fear of STIs keep me in line (usually). At any rate my aim is to lessen my own risk by avoiding all out BBFS woth the neighborhood BB bycicles.  What is a zpack by the way?

Zpack is a sort of genericide (ie xerox, kleenex, band-aid etc) and usually refers to some antibiotic that will treat most of stds. Derived originally from Zithromax.

Google will probably do a better job than me in describing it