One of the reasons I created this thread was to get some feedback from others to see just how important to them it was to see some girl on girl activity in a threesome.
Judging by the feedback, it’s at least somewhat more important to everyone else than it is to me.
For me, I’m good if they do a playful snuggle or two and maybe a kiss. If I’m flagging between rounds a little affectionate four handed massage for five minutes or so will do the trick for me.
Though, I will admit that one girl eating out another girl while wiggling her butt in the air to get my attention is also a pretty significant turn on.
But my primary criteria is for it to be a fun, lustful environment focused primarily on me. If the girls aren’t genuinely having fun (or extremely good actors), it becomes less fun for me, too.
I know not everybody cares for it. But I love a great, enthusiastic threesome.
If there’s a great blowjob sandwich and girls who at least act completely uninhibited like they can’t wait to get whatever part of you they can, in whatever way they can while you try to please them both at the same time, then that’s when I start having fun. The kind where they have to wipe you off carefully as each girl takes turns may be nice for some. But it’s not my cup of tea.
I used to save my threesome time for when I traveled to Brazil or Thailand. But traveling is just too difficult these days. So, I’m looking for a great local threesome.
So, who’s the current best in your opinion? Bunny Girls? Kgirl Academy? Yuna and Kat sound like they might be the best. What do you think?
While we’re at it, I think it would be great to hear about the legendary threesomes of the past as well. For me there was this little part Korean girl and partner working together in Rio. They just didn’t care about the clock. If they could get an erection out of you (and they were so hot this was easy) then it was theirs to play with as long as you could keep it up.
There kinda has been a lack of doubles altogether, so it's not like there's a lot to choose. We have one set of doubles at BG, KGA, and...is that it ?
I'm not a big fan of Kat, so I probably wouldn't enjoy Yuna/Kat. Yuna always tells me doubles in general are a waste of time and money when I ask her about them, I'm not sure why exactly she tells me that, never had a doubles girl tell me that before. If she's just being honest, that's highly commendable.
I'm not usually a doubles person, but I wish I tried Claire/Yuna when they were still offering. I also heard some legendary threesomes were Amy/Angela and Min/Hannah
I dated a girl who had GREAT doubles reviews, but she HATED doing them. That of course didn't stop clueless guys from writing reviews claiming "how into each other" the girls were.
Yuna might be one of those girls who offers threesomes but doesn't like doing them because most guys like to see the girls interact and if a girl has ZERO bi tendencies I can understand how uncomfortable she might be doing doubles. Can you imagine as a straight guy not only having to do MMF sessions but having to interact with the other guy as well?
Well, the thing is context-wise, Yuna is the most experienced girl there, and she is the one teaching most girls in the org and she is the one who runs the double sessions. And when she retires, she will run some org, if shes not half-running this one now already.
And especially since this org charges 600 for 1hr of doubles, which is more than 2.5x the single girl rate (220)
What I'm trying to say is, you'd think $-wise, she'd be willing to advertise it more and make it seem attractive. Instead she just tells me to see her more often lol.
A lot of providers, actually a lot of people in general would rather do something they like for less money than something they hate to do for more. It sounds like she doesn't like doing doubles, but it does sound like she enjoys fucking you. lol
It also means it's very unlikely that she is actually bisexual, and I can COMPLETELY understand her POV. I "might" be able to fuck an old fat woman if my financial circumstances were bad enough, but I can't imagine being desperate enough to suck a dick, or even to pretend to do so. lol
Those two were truly lesbian in their pursuit of orgasm in the threeway.
Haven't tried any Bunnygirl doubles, but am curious if Kira would do it. She's a super slut, and if she digs the slit it would get me there for multiple repeats!
Oh yeah, I forgot this one, heard many a good thing about them (even though they're not here anymore). The #1 thing for doubles you'd need to have is chemistry..............
I tried to schedule them. But, unfortunately, it was the day after their last day.
I’m hoping that we can avoid turning this thread into another soapbox thread on reviews and get back to talking about actually getting laid. Especially in a hot threesome!
So, other than the KGA threesome we’ve already talked about, has anyone heard of other Kgirl threesomes that might be available?
Or are there two girls in the same org that anyone thinks might make a great duo?
At the time I posted this, there were at least 4 duos available.
But right now, I can only find the one from KGA. As mentioned above, this always (and rightfully) stars Yuna.
But we also know that Yuna doesn’t really like doing doubles.
My big problem is this: I think the emphasis on girl on girl action spoils a good doubles session for me. And I believe it also makes it harder to talk girls into offering it.
When I wasn’t mongering, I still received offers (which I may or may not have accepted) for threesomes. Except in one case, none of these were from girls who were actually lesbian or bi. They were just girls who liked me a lot and liked each other as friends, too. But they really just wanted to blow my mind. Of course I still did my best to make sure they had a good time, too. But the most girl on girl action I got in those threesomes was a blowjob sandwich, some girl on girl snuggling and a show-off kiss or two. The rest was purely heterosexual sex with me in the middle.
As long as the girls aren’t obsessed with wiping me off whenever I move from one to the other, I’m good. Those wipe downs and condom swaps are a turn-off though. They are what spoils a potentially great doubles session for me.
And I really wouldn’t have it any other way. I always prefer threesomes that are honest about being for the man’s entertainment. Does this make me a narcissist? Maybe. But everybody is at least a little bit narcissistic. I think an FFM threesome is at its best when everybody’s open about the goal. That goal is almost always focused on blowing the guy’s mind. Pure, unadulterated narcissistic heterosexual sex put on by two hot women for one guy they like. Though, at the end of the day, the one on one session is still my favorite. But sometimes a super hot threesome is just what the doctor ordered.
In that way, it’s a lot like when a girl offers you anal sex. Most women aren’t super big on anal sex. But they know some of us like it. So, when they’re in the mood, they offer it to us. And in the best cases, they get into it, too. Not because its their favorite thing. But because it does feel good (If we do it right) and it’s also pretty damn hot to them to see how much we enjoy it.
It seems a lot of guys want the “porn experience” threesome. The one with all the hot lesbian visuals. I just don’t really get off on that. I’ve been in a lesbian FFM threesome. When they’re genuinely lesbian, you are there as a side piece and are a bit of a distraction from what the girls like most. Which isn’t your dick.
I’d like to suggest that we could probably get access to more willing women if we are willing to be open about what we really want in that FFM session. And, if what we really want is for two hot, skilled women to put all of their energy for an hour or two into blowing our minds and fucking and sucking us silly.
I’ve done this multiple times before. And I’ve done it with girls who don’t actually offer doubles sessions. Back when I was seeing more girls than I do now, I would frequently meet providers who were friends with each other. At some point, if I was so moved, I’d suggest to each of them separately how much I’d love to have a doubles session with them.
But I’d always explain that I didn’t want them to be lesbians. Just to be their usual super hot selves for me at the same time. I’d even talk about the kind of activities I’d like to do (if they showed any interest). If they started smiling when we talked about it, I knew there was at least a shot. And sometimes I’d actually get the shot. Oh yeah.
-- Modified on 8/22/2020 9:03:18 AM
"At the time I posted this, there were at least 4 duos available."
I actually checked right before I replied to your post, with every org advertisement. The only duos were available at BG and KGA. Two @KGA and two @BGC, not sure you counted those. So I stand by my statement. I usually do my research by stating what I say.
Cool.
I texted two others to check availability. But I don’t really care if you believe me. The exact number of available duos was not the primary point. But you are entitled to believe whatever you wish.
Sorry, this wasn't meant as a shot. It sounded like you said what I mentioned was wrong at the time, but at least for someone whos looking strictly at website advertising (no texting or calling orgs), this was true.
I know the exact number of available duos was not primary point.
I merely responded to what I felt like responding to. As for the rest of your post - I agree with you more than not. I want both of the girls focus on me, but also some interaction and chemistry while doing so. I don't want them to eat out each other all the time, but also don't want them just taking turns with you. IE, some interaction is necessary imo.
"Those wipe downs and condom swaps are a turn-off though. They are what spoils a potentially great doubles session for me." - 100% agree. If we have to condom swap, Id rather not have a session at all. Sex is spontaneous, and nothing better to make me lose a boner faster than having to swap condom each time I want to dip into the other girl.
Yes. Good luck getting them to wear it tho. But yes. That's one good thing about FC2
But of course if BLPOS had ever actually been with any K-Girls he'd know that.
Actually I am sure he knows that just from making a nuisance out of himself on this board for all these years, he was just trying to make himself relevant (for a change) with his comment about FC2's
I'd rather do bare than switch condoms, and I don't do bare that often.
Switching condoms is deflation central for me. I actually hear girls are kinda warming up to FC2, but doubles already got so much shit you got to worry about, trying to convince two kgirls on the spot to wear FC2 you bought yourself and trying to explain to them in broken English that it will be just as good as a rubber on you....sounds like an absolute nightmare.
Kgirls to use FC2's, and only had one double that would even try it, and because of their unfamiliarity with how to use them, it was awkward as hell, but one of the girls went on to offer it as an option individually for awhile, but stopped after awhile because the "house" would not cover the cost, so it became an additional overhead expense for her personally. However, once the double figured out how to seat them properly, it was one of the best doubles I ever had.
I just like the subject of your post. “I have tried to get many..”
Even though I prefer most of my sessions to be one on one, I’m always on the lookout for a good FFM session. I have tried to get many. I’ve had more than a few. But I’d love to have many more.
Good one, but with P4P, we don't have to TRY very hard. If you've got the money, you get the girl(s). Lol
Unfortunately, truly bisexual Asian girls are somewhat rare. The best doubles I have had were with American providers. Some of them like eating pussy as much as I do. Seeing some girl-girl action is what gives me wood so fast for round two.
One of the reasons I created this thread was to get some feedback from others to see just how important to them it was to see some girl on girl activity in a threesome.
Judging by the feedback, it’s at least somewhat more important to everyone else than it is to me.
For me, I’m good if they do a playful snuggle or two and maybe a kiss. If I’m flagging between rounds a little affectionate four handed massage for five minutes or so will do the trick for me.
Though, I will admit that one girl eating out another girl while wiggling her butt in the air to get my attention is also a pretty significant turn on.
But my primary criteria is for it to be a fun, lustful environment focused primarily on me. If the girls aren’t genuinely having fun (or extremely good actors), it becomes less fun for me, too.
Girl on girl explicit action is not that important to me either, but if they actively are avoiding each other, it's a turn off. This would happen in an storefront before with 4-hand 'massage'.
Few of my favorite positions to do in doubles are
1. One girl bbbj + the other rimming. This of course is a bummer if you have girls who dont rim (ie, Yuna)
2. Stackers. A lot more agility is required than most guys think, lol. Dipping in and out is extremely lustful and sexy.
3. Mouth to vagina action. Porn style. Bonus points if the girl is massaging the clit of the girl you're fucking with lips or finger.
The problem with doubles, at least for me, that the reality is a little bit more awkward and not as fun as imagining it. And for example, I avoided a Yuna/Claire doubles (and now Im regretting it) because they were two of my atfs, and I wasn't sure how they would feel after such a session. I know, sounds stupid, but I kinda didn't want to ruin good things going with each of them.
The actual logistics in making it as hot as what you anticipated sometimes put a damper on the festivities. I know the limitations on my own flexibility, but sometimes I'm not prepared for young Asian women who are a little over half my age to have similar physical limitations.
The best way to have a good doubles-session is to have one of your regulars pick another girl who she has had doubles with before and is totally comfortable with. Of course, this is seldom possible with the Kgirl business model, but works perfectly with American indies, which could also be two Asian girls if you are partial to Asian girls like most of us are. For Kgirls, it must be two girls who are sharing an incall apartment, which is often governed by scheduling rotations and the two girls may not want to do it because of who the other girl is (they don't always get along).
The exception that comes to mind is Las Vegas, where Kgirls do outcall to your hotel for an upcharge. Then its theoretically possible to pick any two girls on the roster, and you only have to get past the issue of whether they are cool doing the double with each other.
As I said earlier, it's not at all important to me. I am a selfish pig, it's all about "ME" lol
Like you, I want the girls to be having fun, but not necessarily with each other. Actually some of the worst threesomes are when the girls are so into each other that you feel like a third wheel and more like a spectator than a participant.
While I certainly don't care that others might find it stimulating I just don't get it myself -- but then I'm not really big on voyeurism.
I find that there are multiple ways to get girls to agree to a threesome. But once you get them there, how do you get things kicked off with the level of fun and enthusiasm that makes for a great threesome?
One of the ways I have done this is to treat it a bit like a strip show. You have to tell the girls how hot they are and encourage them when they are doing something you like.
But what if that’s not enough? I bring 20s to every threesome. If things slow down I say “$20 to the first girl who..” or “$20 for each of you if..”. I find that I only have to do this two or three times. Once they start competing with each other for more money it’s all a win. When they accept the first or second challenge the ice is generally fully broken and the game is on.
There is more nuance to doing it well than I have covered here. But I think you guys can figure the rest out for yourselves. Use this trick or not. It’s totally up to you.
Note: I’ve only used this approach a couple of times here in the U.S.. I used it a lot in Thailand and Brazil. But it always works for me.
Serious Q. If two girls know each other, get regular testing, and trust each other, why not accept one standard condom going back and forth?
.
If they kiss each other, double BBBJ with each other, fondle and FIV each other, eat each other ... why not accept one standard condom going back and forth?
.
The major issue I can think of is "depth". Fingers penetrate a few inches. A rigid condom wrapped penis penetrates 2x or 3x more (you may speak for yourself). Is there something lurking much deeper in the hole that is riskier than the first few inches? More yeast? More bacteria? More whatever?
.
I could go completely XXX porn here and ask about a single standard condom that goes from pussy A to mouth (A and/or B) for a sloppy, slurpy rinse and then into pussy B. Would the girls be comfortable with that?
.
Some people do things that are ineffective but make them feel more comfortable, e.g., wear a tin foil hat. Is condom switching a tin foil hat? Are there any studies that compare "one standard condom going back and forth" to "constant switching to a new condom with every change of partner" to "FCs"?
.
If there isn't enough real data, I would like to volunteer to participate in that study. To be fair, each male participant should be enrolled in EVERY arm of the study (single condom; switching condoms; FCs; etc.) in order to have consistent performance and a stable baseline. WHERE CAN I SIGN UP?
.
Your thoughts if any? (borrowed from escalade1964)
Kgirls to use FC2's, and only had one double that would even try it, and because of their unfamiliarity with how to use them, it was awkward as hell, but one of the girls went on to offer it as an option individually for awhile, but stopped after awhile because the "house" would not cover the cost, so it became an additional overhead expense for her personally. However, once the double figured out how to seat them properly, it was one of the best doubles I ever had.