I can’t find any reviews for this org. But I am new to using the TER search engine. Am I missing some TER search engine trick? Or do these girls just not have reviews yet?
If the latter, that seems odd to me. What am I missing?

Go to search.  Input San Mateo --) Jean comes up with a recent review.

Some tips for the TER search engine:

I haven't sessioned at Bunnygirls.  I was going to but then I met Nora at Baykisses.

Thanks so much for the info.

I am of the opinion that Senor Spoon, international man of mystery and magic, may be the TER  Bunnygirls resident expert.  It would be wonderful if he can give us his quality content.

I was confused last night when I mentioned Vixen at Bunnygirls.  Vixen is at SweetAngels.  Tiana gets the nod at SweetAngels.  Tiana may just be the sexiest kgirl in Nor Cal Wonderland.

about 2015 under another name.   After a good run of about 4 or 5 months, she tried LA for a few months, and then onto the BA where she seem to get a lot more regulars.  She came back here for another go in  OC briefly in 2017 and during the summer of 2018, but just couldn't get the traction she had with the local guys before.  I saw her a couple times while she was here, and I thought she was better than when she started, but at the time she was here, there were a lot of other first-tier girls at the same agency, so it was not the big win she was hoping for.  I think she can compete more favorably with the top girls in the BA than she can here.  

The 'rumored' waterworks girl out of BGC is Elin.

indoorsport's review is AT LEAST a conflict of interest review.

Elin hunh?!  

Since you have concluded you are now our resident review cop perhaps you can give us your sage advice on this review.

Admits a girl was his friend and he was "helping her" with his review, why you give any weight whatsoever to the review, or even care what he wrote.  I have to admire his integrity for being forthright about his motive.  As such, I don't consider this a shill when there is full disclosure.   This guy is just like Mufftime, but with transparency.  Any monger who  gets taken in more than once, its because he's stupid, not because of what Mufftime does.   Same with this guy you're talking about.  If he TELLS you he's hustling you, then you fall for it anyway, who's fault is that?

He didn't admit it in the review, and he didn't disclose it in the review. Wtf are you talking about? He admitted it on another message board,on neurotic donkey, when confronted about him shilling for sweet angels. Maybe you should actually read the review first before writing?  

The review you linked isn't very helpful, you are correct. I can't say whether or not it's honest, as I need to take a look at his other reviews. In general, it's a generic review that doesn't explain why the lower grade. It's pretty much useless. If you think I will condone low grade unhelpful reviews because they give a girl a low grade, you're gravely mistaken. You act like I just want people to give girls low grades. That's not what I want,at all.  

I would tell you to give Yuffie another try, but of course, up to you my dude. Coincidentally, my top 3 girls in the bay are all eager swallowers. What can I say, I like em nasty.

Odd that you mentioned that about lobbying for lowering the ratings. I was beginning to wonder if that was actually your agenda.

I thought I was replying to cdl. Guess I need a reading comprehension refresher myself

The famous Mint left the Bay Area around 2016, I think. I heard she was touring on the east coast. Did you ever meet her?

I definitely saw a girl named Mint but too far back to remember much. I doesn't seem I wrote a review so perhaps not the same girl. Back then, typically if I had a good session I was happy to share the news but not always -- writing reviews are a PITA most of the time IMO.

Being a newbie on this board, is that THERE ARE NO PRIVATE CONVERSATIONS.  Anyone can respond to anything someone else posts, not just the person YOU responded to.  All thoughts are welcome.  That's why I prefer posting on TER over other sites where Admin there is notorious for censoring free speech, and then they brag about it by leaving their own post that says it was removed because it was argumentative.  It should be called the Kumbayah board.  

???
I wasn't censoring anyone out, I literally thought I was replying to you while I was replying to him. Why would I ever censor a monger who isn't breaking board rules?  

He clearly "misplaced" his post, something people who have been here for years do all the time and I doubt anyone but you thinks he was trying to have a "private" conversation with anyone, he's new to TER not new to fuck boards.

I have to admit I agree with you about reviews.  

was SO much better than the 'modernized one' even many years after the modernization took place.  Under the original user interface it was Always very clear who was replying to what, but not so much anymore.  I've been on the site since before 2005 and am often shocked where in a thread my post shows up.  And God help anybody who uses the "flat" view interface ...

were jumping on Jensen for replying to your post to me.  If that's not the case, I stand corrected.  My apologies.

I do think he was responding to the thread but thinking it was you, not me that he was responding to. That makes sense as you do have a review for Tiana.  

Saluations ! Rocketqwerty and Twoon !!
Cordelion and Jensen ....Rocketqwerty knows what he is talking about in terms of spotting fake reviews and his opinions on provider friendly hobbyists.  We are refugees from another shitshow but far from newbies.

No worries. Water under the bridge.

Mint came back as Hyuna and was her perhaps 9 months ago

Crap. I wish I’d known that.  

I've wondered at times if a 3 level rating - good, neutral/not important to me, bad along with a collection of both service activities and looks related attributes without any of the free text would not be better.

Of course on TER it's really more of a 7-10 scoring system with anything below a 7 being just plain Bad/Ugly.

Add CIM to the activities that could move service from a 9 (which presumes DFK and BBBJ) to a 10.  Some of the best overall sessions I've had were with girls who were oral queens, but under the current scoring system, no way to give them a 10.  It also punishes petite girls that simply can't handle anal even if they wanted to.  I stopped doing doubles a couple of years ago after a couple of bad ones, so even though I COULD give them a 10, they didn't earn a 10, which is often the case in doubles, IMO.  

I love doubles. But they require a certain level of inhibition in my opinion. Genuine lesbian activity is nice. But it isn’t really required (again, in my opinion).  
What is required is the ability of the girls to genuinely work and play together. The second that one of them has to wipe you down after you’ve been touched by the other girl or, heaven forbid, actually swaps condoms it starts looking like the girls are only there for the doubles premium (the extra price per hour). And that just isn’t fun.  
So, a rating system that gives credit for just doubles, when double scoop can be less fun than a single scoop if it’s not done well, just doesn’t make sense to me.
Sure, they could attempt to come up with some metric that would improve our ability to report “low inhibition” or “teamwork” or something. But I think that’s just slapping a band-aid on the problem.
The current rating system works too hard to report measurable performance as if it was a management by objective employment review.  
There needs to be more allowance somehow for what frequently gets called “soft skills” in those same employment reviews.
Soft skills are considered to be things like etiquette, communication and listening. And I will add “responsiveness”.  Applying those concepts to a session, whether it is a single or a double scoop, is absolutely key to the success and therefore the rating of the experience.  
Yet, for some reason, soft skills aren’t actually covered in the TER rating system. The one thing that sets apart a pro from a noob isn’t included in the review system. At least as I understand it. I’m happy to be educated, though.
This is all just my opinion. Any and all are free to disagree with no judgement from me.

Yeah 1 - 10, 1- 5, 3 level .... they can all work and I agree the biggest problem is about that 7+ range and using the 8 - 10.

and for all practical purposes sometimes it seems like a 9.9-10 scoring system. lol

You no doubt meant gymnastics and DIVING, because their scoring incorporates a Degree of Difficulty .... which, as you imply, I have mentioned previously:  
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/suggestion-and-policy-4/x-out-of-y-scoring--16428?frmSearch=1#16428
.
Most of us want to know about the fundamentals (figure 8s in ice skating) and how well she PERFORMS on the basics. Because we will be performing together, very few of us are interested in trying a quadruple axel or, if you are into bestiality, camel spins.  
.
Top score on a level 7 "degree of difficulty" is a 7-out-of-7 (or a 10-out-of-7; detail to be debated later). A bleh score on a level 10 "D of D" is a 7-out-of-10. I have had many fantastic 7-out-of-7s. A 7-out-of-10 could be disappointing.  
.
The current single-number scoring system pressures Providers into trying things that they don't want to do or aren't good at. X-out-of-Y does not.

And I'm pretty sure people do a lot of complaining about the .x part, even if not always obvious to the audience. LOL

and yes, you have not only "mentioned" it you mention it, along with your skin tone chart, at EVERY opportunity, and next to no one supports either idea.

Thanks for the vouch, bro! Game recognize game. You always had my back at the old place. I truly appreciate it.

I get you guys came from another site that seems like a toilet from what I hear. You have my sympathy. I also get you probably had a certain status there and want to establish that here.  

Twoon, are you sure about lsc Nicole = Nova? Nova's pics don't look like real life Nicole and they don't look like the pics Nicole used when she was at gsc or lovelyangels. Novas pics do look familiar tho, but I can't quite put my finger on it...

I could be wrong Rocketbro...but she looks super duper familiar.

Walking the walk, for me in particular, is getting up on the soapbox. You can ask seanfinn too. I did the same thing more or less when I started actively posting at the old place.  

Not looking for any soapbox nor role nor status.   Really don't care.  Never did.  
Did I try to tell you who you are?  No.
Looking for some honest banter, that is it.  
Do wonder though when Alpaca's bots and shills and similar will figure this one out.  I think it is a matter of when,  not if.

Useyrhead, did you do doubbles with Kendall and Dora?

Sadly, I missed them.

Rocket, I do appreciate where you are coming from, BUT  teaching us yokels what we are doing wrong is your intended mission here, I fear you are going to be VERY disappointed.  People who come onto TER to tell us how we need to change to suit them don't fare very well here. I've been here about 16 years and I have seen literally thousands of posters come and go.  

Jensen.  You left me nothing to talk to him about.   Thanks for saving me 20 minutes.  Lol

Gambler, I never said my mission is to teach people what they're doing wrong. I never intend to bully any monger, in fact just the opposite. Anyone on the board is welcome to do whatever they want. I'd even venture to say that most mongers just want to get some kgirl pussy and not engage in drama. That's fine. My purpose is to help mongers, and that includes providing my thoughts on dealing with orgs. Whether or not you agree with these thoughts is up to you. Some might not be aware that via their actions some newbie mongers are being fucked over. Raising awareness there is important imo.  

Invoice is in the mail. Will be looking for 50% of the total revenue from all your businesses for the 20 minutes.  Something of a preemptive consulting service fee. Granted not much consulting was done but that how good I am so the 50% is well spend lol

I never said you're lucky to have me here. Probably the opposite, actually. Depends on what your viewpoint is.

"The question that got everyone hot and bothered was "is it acceptable for orgs to silence mongers' feedback via threatening to BL anyone who gives subpar review grade?". It's quite an elegant probe question that can show a lot depending the response, or even lack of response. Because once you start answering it, you realize that either you're admitting publicly that you're OK with breaking TER policies, or admitting publicly you're not OK with org policies."

I wasn't given answers on the forum. You refused to answer my question, citing me moving goalposts and changing your words. Cdl answered in private.  

ONE booker, not many.  The rest are much more subtle.  

OK, it was one booker, and the rest are subtle, sure. But the point is that you said it yourself. How is it not related to TER? Do you want to answer that?  

cordelion, jenson and gambler  :   TER has historically not known to be the fulcrum for Bay area K.  As it develops into that, the fake reviews will follow. Already a a few reviewer names on TER  for Bay area reviews have made me scratch my head.  
 
Instead of this detailed back and forth between you and rocketqwerty lets just wait and see how it plays out.

about org shill reviews on TER, but you have yet to point out a single one.  That's the reason you're becoming chicken little. Jensen warned you about how you lose cred here by bringing your baggage over from a second-rate site.  Its like  you've been driving a Hyundai that you hate and you're trying to tell us a Mercedes is just as bad.  That pig won't fly here.  You're just making yourself look BSC.  

I GAVE an example in this VERY thread- indoorsport's review of Tiana and explained how it's a shill review.

As the OP I have to say - no personal offense intended, I’m sure you’re a good guy with only good intentions - it really seems like you’re hijacking this thread in a pretty big way. What does this have to do with the original topic?

listen, Im sorry about it. I already offered CDL to take it to another thread.
I was replying to Gambler and CDL posts in the last few posts.

I get it.  
Defending your honor is more important to you than being considerate of others.
I’ve been in your shoes. I know how hard it can be to do the right thing when you feel like others are wrong and you are right.
I can tell you this. I’m sure I’m not the only one who was cutting you slack because you were new. And I’m also sure I’m not the only one that is thinking you’ve begun to establish a strong pattern of behavior that goes beyond what can be simply excused as new guy syndrome.
It’s really not hard, though. You simply post something like “We’re starting to hijack somebody else’s thread. I’ve created a thread on our topic at [location here]. I will post my response to you there.” Some guys will try to take advantage of your lack of response in the hijacked thread. You just reply with “My reply to this is covered at [location here]”.
You’re an adult. I’m sure you can figure this out.

hey man, I did exactly what you said, even before you mentioned it

So I think maybe we should ask. Did you get your answer about site reviews or what you wanted to know about the agency?

I got suggestions and workarounds.  

you will not stop responding when you are called out.  It has nothing to do with whether you're right or wrong.  Guys like you never own anything.  Congrats for having such a flawless life.