All good Rocketbro! Your input and perspective are appreciated. I value your input. I consider myself a guest on TER and appreciate the warm welcome. Just my style...
Who the fuck knows.
What I think I can say is that:
1) The board is at least breathing and most of the discussion is K-Girl and K-world related and
2) We're not talking ONLY about how miserable things are due to the virus.
So, Yea being all argumentative with each other! It's an improvement 
I'm willing to curb my review "crusade" until I do full analysis of ter reviews, or find new influx of fake reviews. If I'm getting such a big pushback and my 'challengers' are switching goalposts all the time, from "there are no org reviews on TER" to "there are no major org reviews in so cal", and people think it's ok,then I see no point in parroting it. I'll issue one PSA and be done with it. Fuck it. I'll be watching the bay orgs and shitty socal orgs very closely tho, as I vowed to. I know what they do on other sites so I'll always keep an eye open.
I'll make my own thread where I will dump reviews I find fake and let others decide for themselves.
I already issued a psa about not being scared to make lower grade reviews. I'll just bump it from time to time. May any org/booker that threatens to bl a monger for an honest and truthful feedback, lose 10x the money.
I apologize to my bay brothers twoon and useyrhead for messing up their threads.
And if anyone has an idea what is the best way to get to ter about my own review and change a grade from 9 to 10, I will be thankful for such a suggestion. Maybe it was my own mistake, but if ter changes grade of your own review down, this is a factor I haven't even considered. Claire deserves a 10 ,goddamit.
NeuroticMonkey in SoCal has so many fake reviews that it was useless to me. There were many reviews I thought were written by someone affiliated with an org or who got some special benefits. Those orgs were not as well-known as orgs that TER reviewers like to visit. It's harder for an org to write fake reviews on TER. Currently there may be some questionable reviews for Kgirls on TER from a couple orgs such as one of the org you pointed out but it will never get as bad as the other site. There will still be the usual shill reviews and fake reviews for free VIPs.
.
When you have convincing evidence of a fake review, click on the Report A Problem button and describe your reason. TER will remove it if they believe you. You will also get free VIP days too.
.
Same thing with rebranding Kgirls, just click on the Report A Problem and provide the other profile for her with the reason why you think they are the same provider. TER will link those different profiles and reviews together.
.
You cannot change the performance score of a Kgirl to a 10 because: "An escort provider is only eligible to earn up to a 7, unless she performs one or some of the following during a session: Kisses With Tongue, Bare-Back Blow Job, Really Bi, Anal Sex, or More than One Guy."
.
A Kgirl can have a max of 9 from DFK and BBBJ alone. She gets a 10 if she does Anal, or Really Bi, or More than One Guy.
NeuroticMonkey in SoCal has so many fake reviews that it was useless to me. Guy.
Most fake reviews on donkey were done by orgs. There were some who did fake reviews to get VIP.
But orgs were the ones who did it shamelessly, especially for new girls. First reviews are important. I'd advise each and every monger to write a toftt review for each toftt they do and doubly so if it's a bad experience. It helps out other people immensely. When I'm interested in a girl and I read she is playing with her phone during the session, it's a hard nope for me,for example. Well detailed reviews are great for mongers, and bad for orgs if the reviews are less than stellar. So clearly there's always a conflict of interest between the reviews org want and what the monger should write, in case of an average session
Just admit that you are new to TER before claiming to have all the answers PLEASE.
Here is the answer to your question.
Providers are eligible for a MAXIMUM of a performance score of seven unless they offer either BBBJ, DFK, Anal, really bi, or more than one guy.
IOW DFK? Yes. You can give your girl an eight. BBBJ? Yes, now you can give her a nine, Anal? (not just allowed, but actually provided) no. Really bi? (has to be an actual threesome) No, More than one guy? (has to be an actual gang bang) No.
According to TER rules your lady is allowed a score NO HIGHER than a nine.
Yes, many/most of us hate this rule, but it is the rule here, and almost everyone on this board who has been here any length of time knows this, and that is why is irritates me so when newbies (YES you are a TER newbie, no matter how many years you've been on other boards) take it upon themselves to lecture to those of us who have been here for years before they (YOU) even know the rules of the road on this site. PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE try getting the lay of the land here for a few weeks before lecturing to us again PRETTY PLEASE.
I never claimed to not be new to TER...thanks for the breakdown of the rules. I appreciate it. Each site has its own rules and this board is really strange to navigate and asp.net is bleh as a server engine imo. I do respect rules of TER. My atf does bi (or at least she did threesomes before), will it qualify her for a 10 next time?
I don't think laughing at newbies is something TER related, so I think I have the right to an opinion there, with all due respect. Just like you have the right to ridicule it.
Fake reviews do exist everywhere too. The extent of the problem is different everywhere too. It seems to be very little of it here.
I can agree orgs blacklisting mongers because of TER reviews is TER related.
Again, I'm only on TER because that's where bay orgs started to advertise their kgirls at. I'm watching them here, on switter and on other sites. And elsewhere.
Thanks again for the help. It is much appreciated.
It is very difficult for me, but I will try to use your suggestions.
Is to not only "offer" the service, but to actually engage in it during the session being reviewed
That means to be eligible for a 10, if the session is one on one with no other person in the bed they actually have to ENGAGE in anal sex or a 9 is the highest score allowed. Similarly, actually being bi, or offering gang bangs does not qualify a provider for that last point, there actually has to be a third person in the bed to qualify for a 10 if there is no ass fucking going on.
Those are the rules and yes THEY SUCK!!! I can't think of anyone who agrees with them. Maybe we can start a new campaign on the S&P board? I started one a few years ago and even though a shattered the record with over 100 LIKES, obviously it fell on deaf ears because NOTHING was done by admin regarding the scoring system.
I dunno. I looked at the 'ms Spring 2020' winner and I see no evidence to back her being so highly touted. But I'm never going that route any way, so whatever.
Seems like if a k-girl has a ten it's gotta be bullshit.
Fight me.
sag
and the rules were different back then.
Obviously there are no rules where it comes to appearance, I have seen a lot of TER tens that would barely make a six on the GaGa scale.
That's fine, man, I get how it works now. Thanks. I will have to adjust my grading scale accordingly knowing it's the case, which is no biggie.
Plus, I always leave fbsa in the body of review anyway, so if anyone reads up to that point, they know what to expect. Cheers.
Just curious about..
I’m pretty sure I read in at least one of Claire’s reviews that she’s one of the rare kgirls that allows FIA. Does that count as enough anal to give her 10?
No, but that's OK. Even if kgirl allows anal, it's not something I'd want to put in a review because it's always ymmv. If I see her 20 times, I might get it but others won't.
But once mongers see the review, they'd now demand it. Which is unfair. Maybe once kgirl baseline services include anal. Or for provides such as jasmine/silk or Pepsi who allow anal openly.
If its not advertised, but you got it, you still don' put it in a review. Unless its advertised, its NOT on the menu for everyone.
I tried that in a review a few YEARS ago and my review got lowered to a nine. I argued with the mods to no avail that she was petite and could not possibly have taken my dick In her ass, but she was open to FIA. It was on her menu on a YMMV basis, but TER's position is that it has to be a service that actually happened, not merely listed in her profile menu. FIA will not get her to a 10.
Thanks for letting me know. I was just curious.
On the petite girl and anal point, I would have thought tiny little Leah couldn’t either. But I guess you just never know until the girls gives it a go.
Note that I ever mentioned this about Leah until quite recently. Since I’m sure she’s gone, I figure it can’t be a problem for her now.
-- Modified on 6/3/2020 10:17:40 PM
All good Rocketbro! Your input and perspective are appreciated. I value your input. I consider myself a guest on TER and appreciate the warm welcome. Just my style...
reasonable guy from your first few posts, and your explanation of how you got your TER username. Glad to have you posting here rather than on the other site that had so many problems.
Twoon is the most nonconfrontational dude you'll ever meet. Someday when I can divulge my identity I'll try to follow through and buy him a few rounds of beers while puffin on some Cali grown.
when you're posting here? Just curious. It would explain a lot. Lol
Usually, no. Twoon is a grower, hence the reference...
With that said, like Dave Chapelle would say, "weed is a background substance. You ain't crisp, but you function"
...but he keeps it entertaining and non-offensive. Just do not rely on his reviews or cut his ratings by 2/3rds 
. He will give high ratings to a centipede.
Hey, be nice! Maybe he's a closet hand-job freak...or foot fetishist...or just likes getting bugged...IDK.
As you were.
sag
While the text of his reviews does sometimes read like a lovesick teenager, his scores don't seem to be out of line with the other reviewers of the same women. It's not like he gives EVERY OTHFB he sees an automatic 10-10 review like other suckup reviewers have done here over the years, actually he doesn't have a single 10-10 review, and only ONE 10 rating at all.
I suppose you are talking about his reviews on other boards, but I'll judge him for what he does here. For the record, I pay little attention to overly effusive reviews from ANYONE, they usually say more about the reviewer than the reviewee, and numerical scores don't really mean a lot to me either.
Back to centipedes, I bet you they get their high scores because when they spread their legs, it's a hundred of them. lol
different numerical scoring system, Twoon's scores are in line with my own. I haven't seen any of the girls he has reviewed, so I can't say how I would score them, but I think his scores are probably accurate, and other than having a soft spot for Zina (two reviews in consecutive months), I believe his reviews accurately reflect the experiences HE had with these girls.
We all know each other from the other board, we are refugees. And Seanfinn and twoon are twice refugees. We've seen each others reviews, lol
With that said, I'm proud of twoon penning a non perfect, 7/7 review for the first time in like, what, 50 reviews? Maybe this site is a much needed fresh start
set the standard for "non-perfect" at 7-7. Anything below a 10-9 or a 9-10 is not perfect. Only 10-10 is perfection on all counts.
CDL --) it's Zuri at Viola's. Although one of my monger friends loves Zina @ LSC. Or is she at Cara's?
And thank you for your gracious welcome!!!
Rocketbro --) beers and 420 anytime! Maybe we can do a tag team after?!?!
Sean --) Sean was our no nonsense pragmatist at Neurotic Donkey. He's ok with me. I tend to get stoned after 9 pm so Sean asks that I do my posts prior.
My brothers from another mother --) I've been mongering since I was 16 and I'm 54. I was a lurker on RB. Loved reading Jamster posts and reviews. Is he a TER member?
I was active at NotAMPmaps. Que sera, sera.
I joined George's Neurotic Donkey and had a nice run until the second kgirl review PURGE. I questioned the veracity of my beloved kgirls providing their photo in an email to get 'verified'. I called BS that he was either working with LE or some such shenanigans. And found myself banned. I don't want to be in a club where I'm not welcome. So good riddance to bad rubbish. Or as I like to say FUCK THAT MOTHER FUCKER and his BS website!!!!
I find myself a guest at TER and promise to be on my best behavior.
Respectfully submitted
What was than line out of Ice Age about respect?
the name wrong. I should have looked again before I posted. I was going to start over on the response, but I was already on a roll with my thoughts, so I guessed as close as I could. No disrespect meant to Zuri if she's BETTER than Zina. Lol
I salute you!!!
"So, Yea being all argumentative with each other! It's an improvement "
So Jensen, do you still think this? Seeing your post in your newest topic,doesnt appear so.
I was saying that at least we're arguing about K-Girls and this activity and not wailing and moaning about the Virus and all the crap around that that existed 4 months ago. So in other words we've moved from stupid, pointless arguments that are completely off topic to stupid, pointless arguments that are at least vaguely on topic for the forum. It was a move in the right directions but hardly a place we want to actually be.
I don't get you at all rocket. What the fuck is the point of dragging up a post from 4 months about and then quoting a single statement without ANY context and ask if I still agree with my statement.
Fair enough. I was just curious if you were of the same opinion now as before. Sorry for asking.